The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Low input remediation techniques for contaminated site management

Low input remediation techniques for contaminated site management
Low input remediation techniques for contaminated site management
Risk-based land management emphasises remediation to manage risks from land contamination, aiming to reduce human and environmental risks while enabling site reuse and redevelopment. Since the mid-2000s, sustainable remediation has gained prominence, driven by global sustainability agendas such as the United Nations 2030 Agenda and the European Green Deal. These frameworks encourage integrated approaches that maximise remediation benefits and minimise negative impacts. Low-input remediation techniques (LIRT) represent a family of approaches characterised by lower energy and resource demands, often leveraging natural processes, renewable resources, or energy sources. Examples include methods using biochar, photosynthesis, or renewable energy systems. LIRT overlap with concepts like gentle remediation options (GRO) and nature-based solutions (NBS), which employ natural processes to address contamination while delivering environmental and societal benefits. While LIRT are typically effective for pathway management rather than source control, they offer sustainable outcomes such as stabilisation, containment, and destruction of biodegradable contaminants. They also contribute to broader sustainability goals, such as reducing carbon footprints and preserving soil functionality, and can support site reuse for biofeedstocks, habitats, or amenity spaces. LIRT are particularly valuable for stalled or economically unviable sites, offering cost-effective and flexible solutions. However, achieving sustainable outcomes depends on site-specific factors, and LIRT often work best when integrated into a broader remedial strategy combining intensive and low-input methods. This paper explores LIRT's potential applications, technical characteristics, and challenges, alongside their benefits for sustainable land management and the restoration of underutilised sites.
567-590
Bardos, Paul
486211ff-0fb6-474e-94dc-deb827ca7d3a
Lai, Jinyu
432de317-3cbd-4dd2-9bbf-e4580b19dc08
Pizzol, Lisa
6305e7aa-d2ac-4199-9150-3bc05a5614a1
Sellitri, Antonio
65c33d63-fa2c-49c2-90f3-9814b340bebf
Couto, Nazaré
6610c252-be54-41d7-8795-5e2f22968063
Derycke, Virginie
7ed97b5b-b54c-4558-a666-584317413640
Guyonnet, Dominique
5bb813ad-092e-4583-9205-e164472a839b
Vogel, Timothy M.
19962b6f-9a5b-4678-b352-e39754b1d336
Kumpiene, Jurate
2d3ed31b-acab-4680-b6d6-d241b925227b
Cundy, Andrew
994fdc96-2dce-40f4-b74b-dc638286eb08
Bardos, Paul
486211ff-0fb6-474e-94dc-deb827ca7d3a
Lai, Jinyu
432de317-3cbd-4dd2-9bbf-e4580b19dc08
Pizzol, Lisa
6305e7aa-d2ac-4199-9150-3bc05a5614a1
Sellitri, Antonio
65c33d63-fa2c-49c2-90f3-9814b340bebf
Couto, Nazaré
6610c252-be54-41d7-8795-5e2f22968063
Derycke, Virginie
7ed97b5b-b54c-4558-a666-584317413640
Guyonnet, Dominique
5bb813ad-092e-4583-9205-e164472a839b
Vogel, Timothy M.
19962b6f-9a5b-4678-b352-e39754b1d336
Kumpiene, Jurate
2d3ed31b-acab-4680-b6d6-d241b925227b
Cundy, Andrew
994fdc96-2dce-40f4-b74b-dc638286eb08

Bardos, Paul, Lai, Jinyu, Pizzol, Lisa, Sellitri, Antonio, Couto, Nazaré, Derycke, Virginie, Guyonnet, Dominique, Vogel, Timothy M., Kumpiene, Jurate and Cundy, Andrew (2026) Low input remediation techniques for contaminated site management. Environmental Science: Advances, 2026 (2), 567-590. (doi:10.1039/d5va00242g).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Risk-based land management emphasises remediation to manage risks from land contamination, aiming to reduce human and environmental risks while enabling site reuse and redevelopment. Since the mid-2000s, sustainable remediation has gained prominence, driven by global sustainability agendas such as the United Nations 2030 Agenda and the European Green Deal. These frameworks encourage integrated approaches that maximise remediation benefits and minimise negative impacts. Low-input remediation techniques (LIRT) represent a family of approaches characterised by lower energy and resource demands, often leveraging natural processes, renewable resources, or energy sources. Examples include methods using biochar, photosynthesis, or renewable energy systems. LIRT overlap with concepts like gentle remediation options (GRO) and nature-based solutions (NBS), which employ natural processes to address contamination while delivering environmental and societal benefits. While LIRT are typically effective for pathway management rather than source control, they offer sustainable outcomes such as stabilisation, containment, and destruction of biodegradable contaminants. They also contribute to broader sustainability goals, such as reducing carbon footprints and preserving soil functionality, and can support site reuse for biofeedstocks, habitats, or amenity spaces. LIRT are particularly valuable for stalled or economically unviable sites, offering cost-effective and flexible solutions. However, achieving sustainable outcomes depends on site-specific factors, and LIRT often work best when integrated into a broader remedial strategy combining intensive and low-input methods. This paper explores LIRT's potential applications, technical characteristics, and challenges, alongside their benefits for sustainable land management and the restoration of underutilised sites.

Text
d5va00242g - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 5 December 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 January 2026
Published date: 19 January 2026

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509658
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509658
PURE UUID: c06e3c9a-b5b9-4e27-bc9d-9a2b5fe8af5a
ORCID for Andrew Cundy: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4368-2569

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Feb 2026 17:57
Last modified: 07 Mar 2026 03:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Paul Bardos
Author: Jinyu Lai
Author: Lisa Pizzol
Author: Antonio Sellitri
Author: Nazaré Couto
Author: Virginie Derycke
Author: Dominique Guyonnet
Author: Timothy M. Vogel
Author: Jurate Kumpiene
Author: Andrew Cundy ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×