Calibration offset estimation in mobile hearing tests via categorical loudness scaling
Calibration offset estimation in mobile hearing tests via categorical loudness scaling
Objective: to enable reliable smartphone-based hearing assessments by developing methods to estimate device calibration offsets using categorical loudness scaling (CLS).
Design: calibration offsets were simulated from a Gaussian distribution. Two prediction models - a Bayesian regression model and a nearest neighbor model - were trained on CLS-derived parameters and data from the Oldenburg Hearing Health Repository (OHHR). CLS was chosen because it provides level-independent measures (e.g., dynamic range) that remain robust despite calibration errors. Study Sample: The dataset comprised CLS results from N = 847 participants with a mean age of 70.0 years (SD = 8.7), including 556 male and 291 female listeners with diverse hearing profiles.
Results: the Bayesian regression model achieved correlations of up to 0.81 between estimated and true calibration offsets, enabling accurate individual-level correction. Compared to threshold-based approaches, calibration uncertainty was reduced by factors between 0.41 and 0.79, demonstrating greater robustness in uncontrolled environments.
Conclusions: CLS-based models can effectively compensate for missing calibration in mobile hearing assessments. This approach provides a practical alternative to threshold-based methods, supporting the use of smartphone-based tests outside laboratory settings and expanding access to reliable hearing healthcare in everyday and resource-limited contexts.
Xu, Chen
73268368-81b7-46b9-b752-5d0392977212
Kollmeier, Birger
6de18374-5a52-4ca2-8d1f-08b32ca43942
20 August 2025
Xu, Chen
73268368-81b7-46b9-b752-5d0392977212
Kollmeier, Birger
6de18374-5a52-4ca2-8d1f-08b32ca43942
[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]
Abstract
Objective: to enable reliable smartphone-based hearing assessments by developing methods to estimate device calibration offsets using categorical loudness scaling (CLS).
Design: calibration offsets were simulated from a Gaussian distribution. Two prediction models - a Bayesian regression model and a nearest neighbor model - were trained on CLS-derived parameters and data from the Oldenburg Hearing Health Repository (OHHR). CLS was chosen because it provides level-independent measures (e.g., dynamic range) that remain robust despite calibration errors. Study Sample: The dataset comprised CLS results from N = 847 participants with a mean age of 70.0 years (SD = 8.7), including 556 male and 291 female listeners with diverse hearing profiles.
Results: the Bayesian regression model achieved correlations of up to 0.81 between estimated and true calibration offsets, enabling accurate individual-level correction. Compared to threshold-based approaches, calibration uncertainty was reduced by factors between 0.41 and 0.79, demonstrating greater robustness in uncontrolled environments.
Conclusions: CLS-based models can effectively compensate for missing calibration in mobile hearing assessments. This approach provides a practical alternative to threshold-based methods, supporting the use of smartphone-based tests outside laboratory settings and expanding access to reliable hearing healthcare in everyday and resource-limited contexts.
Text
2508.14824v1
- Author's Original
More information
Published date: 20 August 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 509739
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509739
PURE UUID: f2b0e3ab-2095-49aa-b195-7aec13e82537
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Mar 2026 18:04
Last modified: 04 Mar 2026 03:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Chen Xu
Author:
Birger Kollmeier
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics