The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Calibration offset estimation in mobile hearing tests via categorical loudness scaling

Calibration offset estimation in mobile hearing tests via categorical loudness scaling
Calibration offset estimation in mobile hearing tests via categorical loudness scaling
Objective: to enable reliable smartphone-based hearing assessments by developing methods to estimate device calibration offsets using categorical loudness scaling (CLS).

Design: calibration offsets were simulated from a Gaussian distribution. Two prediction models - a Bayesian regression model and a nearest neighbor model - were trained on CLS-derived parameters and data from the Oldenburg Hearing Health Repository (OHHR). CLS was chosen because it provides level-independent measures (e.g., dynamic range) that remain robust despite calibration errors. Study Sample: The dataset comprised CLS results from N = 847 participants with a mean age of 70.0 years (SD = 8.7), including 556 male and 291 female listeners with diverse hearing profiles.

Results: the Bayesian regression model achieved correlations of up to 0.81 between estimated and true calibration offsets, enabling accurate individual-level correction. Compared to threshold-based approaches, calibration uncertainty was reduced by factors between 0.41 and 0.79, demonstrating greater robustness in uncontrolled environments.

Conclusions: CLS-based models can effectively compensate for missing calibration in mobile hearing assessments. This approach provides a practical alternative to threshold-based methods, supporting the use of smartphone-based tests outside laboratory settings and expanding access to reliable hearing healthcare in everyday and resource-limited contexts.
arXiv
Xu, Chen
73268368-81b7-46b9-b752-5d0392977212
Kollmeier, Birger
6de18374-5a52-4ca2-8d1f-08b32ca43942
Xu, Chen
73268368-81b7-46b9-b752-5d0392977212
Kollmeier, Birger
6de18374-5a52-4ca2-8d1f-08b32ca43942

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

Objective: to enable reliable smartphone-based hearing assessments by developing methods to estimate device calibration offsets using categorical loudness scaling (CLS).

Design: calibration offsets were simulated from a Gaussian distribution. Two prediction models - a Bayesian regression model and a nearest neighbor model - were trained on CLS-derived parameters and data from the Oldenburg Hearing Health Repository (OHHR). CLS was chosen because it provides level-independent measures (e.g., dynamic range) that remain robust despite calibration errors. Study Sample: The dataset comprised CLS results from N = 847 participants with a mean age of 70.0 years (SD = 8.7), including 556 male and 291 female listeners with diverse hearing profiles.

Results: the Bayesian regression model achieved correlations of up to 0.81 between estimated and true calibration offsets, enabling accurate individual-level correction. Compared to threshold-based approaches, calibration uncertainty was reduced by factors between 0.41 and 0.79, demonstrating greater robustness in uncontrolled environments.

Conclusions: CLS-based models can effectively compensate for missing calibration in mobile hearing assessments. This approach provides a practical alternative to threshold-based methods, supporting the use of smartphone-based tests outside laboratory settings and expanding access to reliable hearing healthcare in everyday and resource-limited contexts.

Text
2508.14824v1 - Author's Original
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (540kB)

More information

Published date: 20 August 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509739
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509739
PURE UUID: f2b0e3ab-2095-49aa-b195-7aec13e82537
ORCID for Chen Xu: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3233-3179

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Mar 2026 18:04
Last modified: 04 Mar 2026 03:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Chen Xu ORCID iD
Author: Birger Kollmeier

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×