Calibration offset estimation in mobile hearing tests via categorical loudness scaling
Calibration offset estimation in mobile hearing tests via categorical loudness scaling
To enable reliable smartphone-based hearing assessments by developing methods to estimate device calibration offsets using categorical loudness scaling (CLS). Calibration offsets were simulated from a Gaussian distribution. Two prediction models—a Bayesian regression model and a nearest neighbour model—were trained on CLS-derived parameters and data from the Oldenburg Hearing Health Record (OHHR). CLS was chosen because it provides level-independent measures (e.g., dynamic range) that remain robust despite calibration errors. The dataset comprised CLS results from N = 847 participants with a mean age of 70.0 years (SD = 8.7), including 556 male and 291 female listeners with diverse hearing profiles. The Bayesian regression model achieved median absolute errors (MAEs) of about 5 dB between the estimated and “true” calibration offsets. Calibration uncertainty was reduced by factors between 0.41 and 0.79, demonstrating greater robustness in uncontrolled environments. CLS-based models show potential to compensate for missing calibration in our simulation study, but validation using uncalibrated mobile-device listening tests with real listeners is still needed. This approach provides a practical alternative to threshold-based methods, supporting the use of smartphone-based tests outside laboratory settings and expanding access to reliable hearing healthcare in everyday and resource-limited contexts.
Calibration offset estimation, big data, categorical loudness scaling, mobile listening tests, remote audiology
1-12
Xu, Chen
73268368-81b7-46b9-b752-5d0392977212
Kollmeier, Birger
6de18374-5a52-4ca2-8d1f-08b32ca43942
Xu, Chen
73268368-81b7-46b9-b752-5d0392977212
Kollmeier, Birger
6de18374-5a52-4ca2-8d1f-08b32ca43942
Xu, Chen and Kollmeier, Birger
(2026)
Calibration offset estimation in mobile hearing tests via categorical loudness scaling.
International Journal of Audiology, .
(doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.14824).
Abstract
To enable reliable smartphone-based hearing assessments by developing methods to estimate device calibration offsets using categorical loudness scaling (CLS). Calibration offsets were simulated from a Gaussian distribution. Two prediction models—a Bayesian regression model and a nearest neighbour model—were trained on CLS-derived parameters and data from the Oldenburg Hearing Health Record (OHHR). CLS was chosen because it provides level-independent measures (e.g., dynamic range) that remain robust despite calibration errors. The dataset comprised CLS results from N = 847 participants with a mean age of 70.0 years (SD = 8.7), including 556 male and 291 female listeners with diverse hearing profiles. The Bayesian regression model achieved median absolute errors (MAEs) of about 5 dB between the estimated and “true” calibration offsets. Calibration uncertainty was reduced by factors between 0.41 and 0.79, demonstrating greater robustness in uncontrolled environments. CLS-based models show potential to compensate for missing calibration in our simulation study, but validation using uncalibrated mobile-device listening tests with real listeners is still needed. This approach provides a practical alternative to threshold-based methods, supporting the use of smartphone-based tests outside laboratory settings and expanding access to reliable hearing healthcare in everyday and resource-limited contexts.
Text
2508.14824v1
- Author's Original
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 30 April 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 May 2026
Additional Information:
PMID: 42084852
Keywords:
Calibration offset estimation, big data, categorical loudness scaling, mobile listening tests, remote audiology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 509739
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509739
ISSN: 1499-2027
PURE UUID: f2b0e3ab-2095-49aa-b195-7aec13e82537
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Mar 2026 18:04
Last modified: 27 May 2026 02:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Chen Xu
Author:
Birger Kollmeier
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics