‘Bridging the gap’: exploring shared decision-making with autistic young people within an NHS Learning Disability and Autism Keyworker Programme in England
‘Bridging the gap’: exploring shared decision-making with autistic young people within an NHS Learning Disability and Autism Keyworker Programme in England
Background: while each young person has the right to participate in shared decision-making about their care and support, autistic young people often report poor experiences of mental health services and are frequently excluded from, or misunderstood within, care planning conversations. Given that shared decision-making requires practitioners and service users to discuss options together, the differences in communication profiles across autistic and non-autistic populations raises questions as to how mutual understanding can be maximised within care planning conversations. This study sought to explore how shared decision-making took place with autistic young people within a specialist NHS autism community mental health service in England, and to elucidate the features of practice that enabled the effective participation of autistic young people in decision-making discussions.
Methods: a qualitative case study was undertaken within an NHS Autism and Learning Disability Keyworker Programme in England involving 13 participants (4 autistic young people, 3 parent/carers, and 6 service keyworkers). Data were collected through regular service observations, interviews and focus groups across six months.
Results: four themes were generated to explain how shared decision-making was enacted within and across the service: 1) navigating organisational tensions, 2) bridging different communication styles, 3) enabling autistic thinking patterns and 4) creating conditions for reciprocity and dialogue. Eight subcategories were developed to illustrate distinctive features of practice which enabled autistic young people’s participation in decision-making conversations.
Conclusion: the findings demonstrate that specialist keyworkers were central to facilitating shared decision-making with autistic young people. Their strong understanding of autism enabled them to bridge communication differences across multiple stakeholders and by adapting communication approaches to suit an autistic profile, their practice encouraged meaningful dialogue. The study offers depth and clarity on strategies used by the keyworkers to enable shared decision-making conversations to take place effectively with autistic young people and has wider applicability across healthcare services.
Ellington, Emily Louise
2f77c38f-a356-4fa9-ad43-77ba35582c93
Parsons, Sarah
5af3382f-cda3-489c-a336-9604f3c04d7d
Kovshoff, Hanna
82c321ee-d151-40c5-8dde-281af59f2142
2 February 2026
Ellington, Emily Louise
2f77c38f-a356-4fa9-ad43-77ba35582c93
Parsons, Sarah
5af3382f-cda3-489c-a336-9604f3c04d7d
Kovshoff, Hanna
82c321ee-d151-40c5-8dde-281af59f2142
Ellington, Emily Louise, Parsons, Sarah and Kovshoff, Hanna
(2026)
‘Bridging the gap’: exploring shared decision-making with autistic young people within an NHS Learning Disability and Autism Keyworker Programme in England.
BMC Health Services Research, 26, [320].
(doi:10.1186/s12913-026-14025-z).
Abstract
Background: while each young person has the right to participate in shared decision-making about their care and support, autistic young people often report poor experiences of mental health services and are frequently excluded from, or misunderstood within, care planning conversations. Given that shared decision-making requires practitioners and service users to discuss options together, the differences in communication profiles across autistic and non-autistic populations raises questions as to how mutual understanding can be maximised within care planning conversations. This study sought to explore how shared decision-making took place with autistic young people within a specialist NHS autism community mental health service in England, and to elucidate the features of practice that enabled the effective participation of autistic young people in decision-making discussions.
Methods: a qualitative case study was undertaken within an NHS Autism and Learning Disability Keyworker Programme in England involving 13 participants (4 autistic young people, 3 parent/carers, and 6 service keyworkers). Data were collected through regular service observations, interviews and focus groups across six months.
Results: four themes were generated to explain how shared decision-making was enacted within and across the service: 1) navigating organisational tensions, 2) bridging different communication styles, 3) enabling autistic thinking patterns and 4) creating conditions for reciprocity and dialogue. Eight subcategories were developed to illustrate distinctive features of practice which enabled autistic young people’s participation in decision-making conversations.
Conclusion: the findings demonstrate that specialist keyworkers were central to facilitating shared decision-making with autistic young people. Their strong understanding of autism enabled them to bridge communication differences across multiple stakeholders and by adapting communication approaches to suit an autistic profile, their practice encouraged meaningful dialogue. The study offers depth and clarity on strategies used by the keyworkers to enable shared decision-making conversations to take place effectively with autistic young people and has wider applicability across healthcare services.
Text
Ellington et al (2026) 'Bridging the gap' Exploring shared decision-making Author Accepted Manuscript
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
s12913-026-14025-z
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 6 January 2026
e-pub ahead of print date: 2 February 2026
Published date: 2 February 2026
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 509749
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509749
ISSN: 1472-6963
PURE UUID: d07b440f-e4e0-46b2-a9f6-615d760c3032
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Mar 2026 17:32
Last modified: 07 Mar 2026 03:16
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Emily Louise Ellington
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics