The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Investigating eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing to improve the mental health recovery of intensive care survivors

Investigating eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing to improve the mental health recovery of intensive care survivors
Investigating eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing to improve the mental health recovery of intensive care survivors
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) affects a substantial proportion of intensive care survivors, with adverse consequences for mental health, daily functioning, and quality of life. Despite this burden, trauma-focused psychological therapies remain largely absent from critical care rehabilitation pathways. A scoping review identified a substantial evidence gap: only two studies have evaluated evidence-based trauma-focused therapies, such as Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing (EMDR), and both were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, under exceptional conditions.This thesis aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary clinical outcomes of using EMDR to treat traumatised survivors of intensive care. A mixed-methods feasibility trial was conducted using a trauma-informed, two-part consent process. Participants were stratified according to PTSD symptom burden at three months post-discharge. Those with post-traumatic stress symptoms were invited into a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of EMDR versus ‘treatment as usual’ (TAU). Those with below-threshold traumatic stress symptoms and those who declined randomisation were enrolled into a parallel observational cohort.Primary findings support the feasibility and acceptability of the trial protocol. Recruitment targets were achieved, retention was high, and fidelity to the EMDR protocol was maintained. The mean reduction in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) scores from pre- to post-intervention was –15.6 points (95% CI: –21.4 to –9.8) in the EMDR group compared to –1.6 points (95% CI: –6.9 to +3.7) in the TAU group (p<0.001).A greater proportion of EMDR participants (68.4%) achieved a clinically meaningful reduction in PTSD symptoms than those receiving TAU (15.0%; p = 0.001).Qualitative interviews with patients and therapists confirmed the intervention was emotionally demanding but acceptable and meaningful.In summary, this study demonstrates that investigating EMDR in traumatised ICU survivors using a two-part consent process is both feasible and acceptable and may be associated with clinically meaningful reductions in post-traumatic stress symptoms. These findings provide a foundation for the design and implementation of a fully powered randomised controlled trial.
University of Southampton
Bates, Andrew Charles
46ff2189-9345-45bb-bb83-c90971ccccb4
Bates, Andrew Charles
46ff2189-9345-45bb-bb83-c90971ccccb4
Grocott, Mike
1e87b741-513e-4a22-be13-0f7bb344e8c2
Baldwin, David
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e
Cusack, Rebecca
dfb1595f-2792-4f76-ac6d-da027cf40146

Bates, Andrew Charles (2026) Investigating eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing to improve the mental health recovery of intensive care survivors. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 270pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) affects a substantial proportion of intensive care survivors, with adverse consequences for mental health, daily functioning, and quality of life. Despite this burden, trauma-focused psychological therapies remain largely absent from critical care rehabilitation pathways. A scoping review identified a substantial evidence gap: only two studies have evaluated evidence-based trauma-focused therapies, such as Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing (EMDR), and both were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, under exceptional conditions.This thesis aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary clinical outcomes of using EMDR to treat traumatised survivors of intensive care. A mixed-methods feasibility trial was conducted using a trauma-informed, two-part consent process. Participants were stratified according to PTSD symptom burden at three months post-discharge. Those with post-traumatic stress symptoms were invited into a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of EMDR versus ‘treatment as usual’ (TAU). Those with below-threshold traumatic stress symptoms and those who declined randomisation were enrolled into a parallel observational cohort.Primary findings support the feasibility and acceptability of the trial protocol. Recruitment targets were achieved, retention was high, and fidelity to the EMDR protocol was maintained. The mean reduction in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) scores from pre- to post-intervention was –15.6 points (95% CI: –21.4 to –9.8) in the EMDR group compared to –1.6 points (95% CI: –6.9 to +3.7) in the TAU group (p<0.001).A greater proportion of EMDR participants (68.4%) achieved a clinically meaningful reduction in PTSD symptoms than those receiving TAU (15.0%; p = 0.001).Qualitative interviews with patients and therapists confirmed the intervention was emotionally demanding but acceptable and meaningful.In summary, this study demonstrates that investigating EMDR in traumatised ICU survivors using a two-part consent process is both feasible and acceptable and may be associated with clinically meaningful reductions in post-traumatic stress symptoms. These findings provide a foundation for the design and implementation of a fully powered randomised controlled trial.

Text
AB amdended thesis 20_02_2026 - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 June 2026.
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mr-Andrew-Bates
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.

More information

Published date: February 2026

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509775
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509775
PURE UUID: 4308d4eb-9781-417d-b2b0-0785d24fecf6
ORCID for Andrew Charles Bates: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3614-0270
ORCID for Mike Grocott: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9484-7581
ORCID for David Baldwin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3343-0907
ORCID for Rebecca Cusack: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2863-2870

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Mar 2026 17:54
Last modified: 06 Mar 2026 03:22

Export record

Contributors

Author: Andrew Charles Bates ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Mike Grocott ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: David Baldwin ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Rebecca Cusack ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×