The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Validation of two efficient and robust smartphone-based threshold (GRaBr) and loudness (rACALOS) measures in typical home settings

Validation of two efficient and robust smartphone-based threshold (GRaBr) and loudness (rACALOS) measures in typical home settings
Validation of two efficient and robust smartphone-based threshold (GRaBr) and loudness (rACALOS) measures in typical home settings
Reliable hearing assessment at home can improve accessibility and reduce dependence on in-clinic testing. To be viable, home-based procedures must provide accurate results within short measurement times and remain robust to factors such as ambient noise and variable user attention. This study validated two such procedures—a Graded Response Bracketing method for pure-tone threshold estimation and a reinforced adaptive categorical loudness scaling method for loudness-growth assessment—using remote, smartphone-based testing. Fifteen young adults with normal hearing completed the tasks at home and in the laboratory. Ambient noise levels in home environments were also recorded. Test–retest reliability was assessed by repeating the home measurements on a separate occasion.

Remote measurements closely matched laboratory results, with mean differences below 1 dB for threshold estimation and below 5 dB for loudness scaling. Test–retest differences obtained at home were small, remaining below 2 dB for threshold estimation and below 1 dB for loudness scaling. These findings demonstrate that smartphone-based pure-tone audiometry and loudness-scaling assessments can achieve high accuracy, efficiency, and reliability when using these procedures, provided that basic acoustic-hygiene conditions (e.g., sufficiently low ambient noise) are maintained.
medRxiv
Xu, Chen
73268368-81b7-46b9-b752-5d0392977212
Schell-Majoor, Lena
78187eff-316c-4cfc-ba26-2a4f2a0cf893
Kollmeier, Birger
660459be-013c-40dc-bdc6-ee4bdafed18f
Xu, Chen
73268368-81b7-46b9-b752-5d0392977212
Schell-Majoor, Lena
78187eff-316c-4cfc-ba26-2a4f2a0cf893
Kollmeier, Birger
660459be-013c-40dc-bdc6-ee4bdafed18f

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

Reliable hearing assessment at home can improve accessibility and reduce dependence on in-clinic testing. To be viable, home-based procedures must provide accurate results within short measurement times and remain robust to factors such as ambient noise and variable user attention. This study validated two such procedures—a Graded Response Bracketing method for pure-tone threshold estimation and a reinforced adaptive categorical loudness scaling method for loudness-growth assessment—using remote, smartphone-based testing. Fifteen young adults with normal hearing completed the tasks at home and in the laboratory. Ambient noise levels in home environments were also recorded. Test–retest reliability was assessed by repeating the home measurements on a separate occasion.

Remote measurements closely matched laboratory results, with mean differences below 1 dB for threshold estimation and below 5 dB for loudness scaling. Test–retest differences obtained at home were small, remaining below 2 dB for threshold estimation and below 1 dB for loudness scaling. These findings demonstrate that smartphone-based pure-tone audiometry and loudness-scaling assessments can achieve high accuracy, efficiency, and reliability when using these procedures, provided that basic acoustic-hygiene conditions (e.g., sufficiently low ambient noise) are maintained.

Text
2024.11.19.24317529v3.full - Author's Original
Download (569kB)

More information

Published date: 19 November 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509790
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509790
PURE UUID: 476d9c4c-c050-4caa-aa29-5286634a11b6
ORCID for Chen Xu: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3233-3179

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Mar 2026 22:57
Last modified: 06 Mar 2026 03:35

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Chen Xu ORCID iD
Author: Lena Schell-Majoor
Author: Birger Kollmeier

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×