The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Emerging Technologies and Trends in Lung Volume Estimation: A Review

Emerging Technologies and Trends in Lung Volume Estimation: A Review
Emerging Technologies and Trends in Lung Volume Estimation: A Review

Accurate lung volume (LV) estimation is critical for assessing respiratory health and diagnosing conditions such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and restrictive lung diseases. While clinical gold-standard tools - spirometry, plethysmography, helium dilution, and arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis - provide reliable data, they are constrained by invasiveness, clinical setting requirements, and the inability to support continuous or ambulatory monitoring. These limitations underscore the demand for wearable, noninvasive technologies capable of enabling real-time, patient-centered respiratory tracking. This systematic literature review (SLR) assesses LV estimation technologies, focusing on wearable and contactless approaches. Studies published between 2014 and 2024 were sourced from IEEE Xplore, Scopus, and PubMed. A structured selection process based on the Angela guidelines was employed, narrowing an initial set of 304 publications to 45 relevant studies. Each study was analyzed based on device type, sensing methodology, measured lung parameters, participant characteristics, activity context, and validation strategies. The review highlights notable progress in wearable respiratory monitoring, particularly through flexible, textile-based, and printable sensor technologies. However, significant gaps persist in the standardization of validation methods, consistency of performance across diverse respiratory activities, and generalizability due to limited participant diversity. Most studies lack longitudinal data necessary for chronic disease monitoring. Future research must prioritize robust validation protocols, inclusive participant sampling, and long-term performance studies in real-world conditions. Addressing these challenges is essential when it comes to advancing wearable lung monitoring from experimental prototypes to clinically viable tools, enhancing early detection, remote monitoring, and personalized respiratory care, which could have far-reaching positive health implications.

biotechnology, lung volume and capacity, respiratory sensors, systematic review, wearable devices, Biotechnology, lung volume (LV) and capacity
1530-437X
23552-23563
Alsagri, Reem
9c26be74-e9c7-4838-ad60-dedcbded4325
Wilde, Adriana
4f9174fe-482a-4114-8e81-79b835946224
Farrahi, Katayoun
bc848b9c-fc32-475c-b241-f6ade8babacb
Alhomoud, Ahmed
ca2bb5eb-0b01-4496-a69b-aa8e89265446
White, Neil
c7be4c26-e419-4e5c-9420-09fc02e2ac9c
Alsagri, Reem
9c26be74-e9c7-4838-ad60-dedcbded4325
Wilde, Adriana
4f9174fe-482a-4114-8e81-79b835946224
Farrahi, Katayoun
bc848b9c-fc32-475c-b241-f6ade8babacb
Alhomoud, Ahmed
ca2bb5eb-0b01-4496-a69b-aa8e89265446
White, Neil
c7be4c26-e419-4e5c-9420-09fc02e2ac9c

Alsagri, Reem, Wilde, Adriana, Farrahi, Katayoun, Alhomoud, Ahmed and White, Neil (2025) Emerging Technologies and Trends in Lung Volume Estimation: A Review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 25 (13), 23552-23563. (doi:10.1109/JSEN.2025.3569510).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Accurate lung volume (LV) estimation is critical for assessing respiratory health and diagnosing conditions such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and restrictive lung diseases. While clinical gold-standard tools - spirometry, plethysmography, helium dilution, and arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis - provide reliable data, they are constrained by invasiveness, clinical setting requirements, and the inability to support continuous or ambulatory monitoring. These limitations underscore the demand for wearable, noninvasive technologies capable of enabling real-time, patient-centered respiratory tracking. This systematic literature review (SLR) assesses LV estimation technologies, focusing on wearable and contactless approaches. Studies published between 2014 and 2024 were sourced from IEEE Xplore, Scopus, and PubMed. A structured selection process based on the Angela guidelines was employed, narrowing an initial set of 304 publications to 45 relevant studies. Each study was analyzed based on device type, sensing methodology, measured lung parameters, participant characteristics, activity context, and validation strategies. The review highlights notable progress in wearable respiratory monitoring, particularly through flexible, textile-based, and printable sensor technologies. However, significant gaps persist in the standardization of validation methods, consistency of performance across diverse respiratory activities, and generalizability due to limited participant diversity. Most studies lack longitudinal data necessary for chronic disease monitoring. Future research must prioritize robust validation protocols, inclusive participant sampling, and long-term performance studies in real-world conditions. Addressing these challenges is essential when it comes to advancing wearable lung monitoring from experimental prototypes to clinically viable tools, enhancing early detection, remote monitoring, and personalized respiratory care, which could have far-reaching positive health implications.

Text
Reem_SLR-V4 - Proof
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Submitted date: 12 November 2024
Accepted/In Press date: 10 May 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 May 2025
Published date: 1 July 2025
Keywords: biotechnology, lung volume and capacity, respiratory sensors, systematic review, wearable devices, Biotechnology, lung volume (LV) and capacity

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509806
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509806
ISSN: 1530-437X
PURE UUID: 28e115cc-c193-471d-9517-ae14b52b79ba
ORCID for Adriana Wilde: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1684-1539
ORCID for Katayoun Farrahi: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6775-127X
ORCID for Neil White: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1532-6452

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Mar 2026 23:13
Last modified: 06 Mar 2026 03:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Reem Alsagri
Author: Adriana Wilde ORCID iD
Author: Katayoun Farrahi ORCID iD
Author: Ahmed Alhomoud
Author: Neil White ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×