The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Fur, feathers, or none at all: how primary schools decide on animal inclusion

Fur, feathers, or none at all: how primary schools decide on animal inclusion
Fur, feathers, or none at all: how primary schools decide on animal inclusion
The inclusion of animals in primary schools is growing, yet how schools decide which animals to include and the roles they fulfil remains poorly understood. Practice is often inconsistent, unregulated, and lacks standardised guidance. This study combined a systematic review of 21 studies (2014–2025) on staff perceptions of therapy animals with an empirical survey of 70 English primary schools, comprising schools who currently have animals (CH); previously had animals but no longer (PH); had considered but decided they did not want to have animals (CDNW), or had never considered including animals (NC).
The review indicated that therapy animals, particularly dogs, can support students’ social and emotional development by enhancing peer relationships, inclusion, empathy, and self-awareness, and promote well-being through reduced stress, anxiety, and improved confidence. Challenges included safety risks, allergies, fear of animals, ethical concerns, animal welfare, and practical considerations. The survey found that visiting animals, especially dogs, were commonly included, with CH schools including them more widely across classes than PH schools. Decision-making involved leadership teams, governors, staff, parents, and children, with attention to cultural, religious, welfare, and safety considerations. Policies and risk assessments were often limited or post hoc. Perceived benefits centred on social-emotional development, emotional and behavioural regulation, and well-being, while risks to people included allergies, bites, and anxiety.
These findings highlight the need for national frameworks, structured guidance, and longitudinal research to support ethical, evidence-informed, and sustainable inclusion of animals in schools. By balancing human and animal welfare, schools can harness social-emotional and therapeutic benefits while mitigating risks, creating inclusive, supportive learning environments.
Therapy animals, therapy dogs, animal-assisted services, staff perceptions, inclusion, social-emotional development, student wellbeing, animal welfare.
University of Southampton
Delicata, Jessica
7fa46d30-a158-4488-952e-7400a1d02a13
Delicata, Jessica
7fa46d30-a158-4488-952e-7400a1d02a13
Mcbride, Anne
8f13b829-a141-4b67-b2d7-08f839972646
Wright, Sarah
775184e7-df20-4253-86c9-90d25e2b104c

Delicata, Jessica (2026) Fur, feathers, or none at all: how primary schools decide on animal inclusion. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 287pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The inclusion of animals in primary schools is growing, yet how schools decide which animals to include and the roles they fulfil remains poorly understood. Practice is often inconsistent, unregulated, and lacks standardised guidance. This study combined a systematic review of 21 studies (2014–2025) on staff perceptions of therapy animals with an empirical survey of 70 English primary schools, comprising schools who currently have animals (CH); previously had animals but no longer (PH); had considered but decided they did not want to have animals (CDNW), or had never considered including animals (NC).
The review indicated that therapy animals, particularly dogs, can support students’ social and emotional development by enhancing peer relationships, inclusion, empathy, and self-awareness, and promote well-being through reduced stress, anxiety, and improved confidence. Challenges included safety risks, allergies, fear of animals, ethical concerns, animal welfare, and practical considerations. The survey found that visiting animals, especially dogs, were commonly included, with CH schools including them more widely across classes than PH schools. Decision-making involved leadership teams, governors, staff, parents, and children, with attention to cultural, religious, welfare, and safety considerations. Policies and risk assessments were often limited or post hoc. Perceived benefits centred on social-emotional development, emotional and behavioural regulation, and well-being, while risks to people included allergies, bites, and anxiety.
These findings highlight the need for national frameworks, structured guidance, and longitudinal research to support ethical, evidence-informed, and sustainable inclusion of animals in schools. By balancing human and animal welfare, schools can harness social-emotional and therapeutic benefits while mitigating risks, creating inclusive, supportive learning environments.

Text
Jessica_Delicata_Thesis 20.02.2026 - Author's Original
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (2MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Miss-Jessica-Delicata
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: 20 February 2026
Keywords: Therapy animals, therapy dogs, animal-assisted services, staff perceptions, inclusion, social-emotional development, student wellbeing, animal welfare.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509810
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509810
PURE UUID: e755b644-b1aa-4fcd-8814-46d5d64af3b4
ORCID for Jessica Delicata: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0009-8136-073X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Mar 2026 23:17
Last modified: 07 Mar 2026 04:11

Export record

Contributors

Author: Jessica Delicata ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Anne Mcbride
Thesis advisor: Sarah Wright

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×