The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Identification of the motivators and barriers to cochlear implantation in adults over 60 years at an auditory implant centre in the UK: a mixed-methods study

Identification of the motivators and barriers to cochlear implantation in adults over 60 years at an auditory implant centre in the UK: a mixed-methods study
Identification of the motivators and barriers to cochlear implantation in adults over 60 years at an auditory implant centre in the UK: a mixed-methods study
Objectives: cochlear implants are an effective intervention for people with severe to profound hearing loss. However, only a small percentage of those who could benefit from cochlear implants have one. We aimed to understand the barriers to access and receipt of cochlear implants in the UK.

Design: mixed-methods study.

Setting: the University of Southampton Auditory Implant Service.

Participants: data on referral route and personal characteristics of 456 patients over the age of 60 at the time of cochlear implantation, who received a cochlear implant before 2020 were included. Semi-structured interviews were held with six people who hear with an implant.

Primary outcome measures: demographic factors and routes of referral for cochlear implantation for older adults who went on to receive an implant. Semi-structured interviews were designed to identify key motivators and barriers to receiving a cochlear implant.

Results: sex and ethnicity did not affect cochlear implant uptake, whereas socioeconomic status and differences in referral pathways were associated with differences in uptake. People from lower socioeconomic groups were underrepresented in the implanted population at USAIS. Certain health providers across the cohort catchment area were more likely to refer patients than others which in turn affected cochlear implant uptake. Barriers to uptake were poor knowledge about implants by patients and clinicians, and fear of surgery. A willingness by patients to explore a way to reduce the daily challenges associated with hearing loss and the support and encouragement of clinicians, family and friends and other people with implants were motivators to implant uptake.

Conclusion: these findings will inform future research to address the key factors preventing eligible individuals from receiving cochlear implants. This will support the development of strategies to improve access to, and uptake of, cochlear implants for older adults.
Cochlear implant, Hearing, Hearing Services Accessibility
medRxiv
Giby, Alisha
1f302f50-901d-4ae5-8719-95c882416b9e
Hough, Kate
81d8630c-6e02-4bea-858a-377717476f6e
Findlay, Callum Andrew
a8f4f69f-e3bc-4a5f-b1d8-c5e38ba0d00e
Grasmeder, Mary
206e6b44-d1cd-43f5-99ac-588ab02d44ef
Newman, Tracey
322290cb-2e9c-445d-a047-00b1bea39a25
Giby, Alisha
1f302f50-901d-4ae5-8719-95c882416b9e
Hough, Kate
81d8630c-6e02-4bea-858a-377717476f6e
Findlay, Callum Andrew
a8f4f69f-e3bc-4a5f-b1d8-c5e38ba0d00e
Grasmeder, Mary
206e6b44-d1cd-43f5-99ac-588ab02d44ef
Newman, Tracey
322290cb-2e9c-445d-a047-00b1bea39a25

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

Objectives: cochlear implants are an effective intervention for people with severe to profound hearing loss. However, only a small percentage of those who could benefit from cochlear implants have one. We aimed to understand the barriers to access and receipt of cochlear implants in the UK.

Design: mixed-methods study.

Setting: the University of Southampton Auditory Implant Service.

Participants: data on referral route and personal characteristics of 456 patients over the age of 60 at the time of cochlear implantation, who received a cochlear implant before 2020 were included. Semi-structured interviews were held with six people who hear with an implant.

Primary outcome measures: demographic factors and routes of referral for cochlear implantation for older adults who went on to receive an implant. Semi-structured interviews were designed to identify key motivators and barriers to receiving a cochlear implant.

Results: sex and ethnicity did not affect cochlear implant uptake, whereas socioeconomic status and differences in referral pathways were associated with differences in uptake. People from lower socioeconomic groups were underrepresented in the implanted population at USAIS. Certain health providers across the cohort catchment area were more likely to refer patients than others which in turn affected cochlear implant uptake. Barriers to uptake were poor knowledge about implants by patients and clinicians, and fear of surgery. A willingness by patients to explore a way to reduce the daily challenges associated with hearing loss and the support and encouragement of clinicians, family and friends and other people with implants were motivators to implant uptake.

Conclusion: these findings will inform future research to address the key factors preventing eligible individuals from receiving cochlear implants. This will support the development of strategies to improve access to, and uptake of, cochlear implants for older adults.

Text
2026.01.08.26343668v1.full - Author's Original
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (429kB)

More information

Published date: 9 January 2026
Keywords: Cochlear implant, Hearing, Hearing Services Accessibility

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509854
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509854
PURE UUID: 7365d357-5da0-4465-b21d-a2b88622192e
ORCID for Kate Hough: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5160-2517
ORCID for Callum Andrew Findlay: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0104-3435
ORCID for Tracey Newman: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3727-9258

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Mar 2026 17:31
Last modified: 10 Mar 2026 03:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alisha Giby
Author: Kate Hough ORCID iD
Author: Callum Andrew Findlay ORCID iD
Author: Mary Grasmeder
Author: Tracey Newman ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×