The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

To what extent are older people living with cancer involved in the decision-making process regarding treatment and support?

To what extent are older people living with cancer involved in the decision-making process regarding treatment and support?
To what extent are older people living with cancer involved in the decision-making process regarding treatment and support?
Introduction: Improving cancer care for all is a priority. Comprehensive assessment is acknowledged as a useful means to identify comorbidities and functional challenges in older people living with cancer. Current studies mainly ascertain the benefits of risk identification and shared decision making amongst the cancer inter-professional team. Our aims were to examine the range and nature of literature exploring how and to what extent older people are involved in decision making relating to their cancer care.

Method: A scoping review of the literature from 2001 to present was executed using the methods defined by Arksey and O’Malley (2002). Systematic searches were conducted using the following online databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsychINFO and EMBASE to locate articles relating to the research question. The concepts were cancer, older people, complexity and qualitative research with corresponding synonyms. Qualitative studies were sought to provide an insight into people’s experiences.

Results: Preliminary findings indicate a number of factors that influence whether older people choose to accept or decline recommended treatment. These include relationship with physician: trust, communication and recommendations; possible adverse side effects of treatment and experiences of significant others as a consequence of treatment. None of the studies identified explicitly addressed the research question of this review. Nil focused on individual's experiences of decision-making.

Conclusion: We have identified significant gaps in the knowledge highlighting the need for further exploration of this important area. Increased understanding of older adults’ involvement in decision-making throughout the cancer trajectory will improve how health care professionals prioritise the preferences of the person in determining what they want from their health care. This will positively influence workforce development and service delivery to identify the need for a person centred approach to ongoing supportive treatment, recovery and/or anticipatory care planning for end of life.
Cancer, decision making, older adult
0002-0729
32-35
Lewis, Lucy Anne
b7bac6f9-0e97-41da-93fe-9af4f0a27f9e
Farrington, Naomi
ba8e905c-862b-4609-b0cc-9e27218de542
Patel, Harnish
514aba46-4dc9-4011-b393-ce83c6206754
Bridges, Jackie
57e80ebe-ee5f-4219-9bbc-43215e8363cd
Lewis, Lucy Anne
b7bac6f9-0e97-41da-93fe-9af4f0a27f9e
Farrington, Naomi
ba8e905c-862b-4609-b0cc-9e27218de542
Patel, Harnish
514aba46-4dc9-4011-b393-ce83c6206754
Bridges, Jackie
57e80ebe-ee5f-4219-9bbc-43215e8363cd

Lewis, Lucy Anne, Farrington, Naomi, Patel, Harnish and Bridges, Jackie (2019) To what extent are older people living with cancer involved in the decision-making process regarding treatment and support? Age and Ageing, 48 (1), 32-35. (doi:10.1093/ageing/afy204.13).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: Improving cancer care for all is a priority. Comprehensive assessment is acknowledged as a useful means to identify comorbidities and functional challenges in older people living with cancer. Current studies mainly ascertain the benefits of risk identification and shared decision making amongst the cancer inter-professional team. Our aims were to examine the range and nature of literature exploring how and to what extent older people are involved in decision making relating to their cancer care.

Method: A scoping review of the literature from 2001 to present was executed using the methods defined by Arksey and O’Malley (2002). Systematic searches were conducted using the following online databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsychINFO and EMBASE to locate articles relating to the research question. The concepts were cancer, older people, complexity and qualitative research with corresponding synonyms. Qualitative studies were sought to provide an insight into people’s experiences.

Results: Preliminary findings indicate a number of factors that influence whether older people choose to accept or decline recommended treatment. These include relationship with physician: trust, communication and recommendations; possible adverse side effects of treatment and experiences of significant others as a consequence of treatment. None of the studies identified explicitly addressed the research question of this review. Nil focused on individual's experiences of decision-making.

Conclusion: We have identified significant gaps in the knowledge highlighting the need for further exploration of this important area. Increased understanding of older adults’ involvement in decision-making throughout the cancer trajectory will improve how health care professionals prioritise the preferences of the person in determining what they want from their health care. This will positively influence workforce development and service delivery to identify the need for a person centred approach to ongoing supportive treatment, recovery and/or anticipatory care planning for end of life.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 7 February 2019
Keywords: Cancer, decision making, older adult

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509985
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509985
ISSN: 0002-0729
PURE UUID: 1d7dbc1d-f2ab-4c76-ab2e-55d11e1d6332
ORCID for Lucy Anne Lewis: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0520-9140
ORCID for Jackie Bridges: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6776-736X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Mar 2026 17:48
Last modified: 14 Mar 2026 03:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lucy Anne Lewis ORCID iD
Author: Harnish Patel
Author: Jackie Bridges ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×