The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Prospective case-control cohort analysis of two-day/two-stage pelvic exenteration surgery: safety, feasibility, acceptability and medium-term outcomes

Prospective case-control cohort analysis of two-day/two-stage pelvic exenteration surgery: safety, feasibility, acceptability and medium-term outcomes
Prospective case-control cohort analysis of two-day/two-stage pelvic exenteration surgery: safety, feasibility, acceptability and medium-term outcomes

Aim: pelvic exenteration (PE) is the only curative option for extensive pelvic cancers. Advances have facilitated increasingly complex resectional and reconstructive components, including per-operative oncological adjuncts such as intraoperative radiotherapy. Cumulatively, these components increase operative duration beyond what is feasible within a single conventional operating day. Two-day/two-stage PE addresses this, but little is known about this approach. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety and medium-term outcomes of a two-day/two-stage PE.

Method: consecutive patients (2010-2025) from a prospectively maintained high-volume PE unit database (n = 373) undergoing two-day/two-stage PE were compared against a matched control cohort of single-day cases lasting ≥15 h. EQ5D-5L and decision regret scores were longitudinally collected after 2021. Surgical, oncological and health-related quality-of-life outcomes were evaluated.

Results: twenty-seven patients underwent two-day/two-stage PE, and 38 had one-day PE; more anal cancers were in the two-day/two-stage group (p = 0.012); median follow-up was 24.2 months. No 90-day mortalities occurred; 3-year overall survival was 54.4% for two-day/two-stage PE and 70.5% for one-day PE (p = 0.31); and R0-resection rates were 82% and 76%, respectively (p = 0.76). Major morbidity occurred in 56% and 47% (p = 0.62), with a median length of stay of 37 and 27 days (p = 0.07) and intensive care days of 5 and 3 (p = 0.08). 12-month EQ5D-5L utility scores were 0.79 and 0.81 (p = 0.96), with low 12-month decision regret in both groups (p = 0.15).

Conclusion: two-day/two-stage PE is safe and feasible, potentially representing the only option for highly selected patients needing high-complexity PE with multiple components. Although equivalent R0-resections were obtained, medium-term oncological outcomes were poorer in patients undergoing two-day/two-stage interventions.

Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Case-Control Studies, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data, Male, Middle Aged, Operative Time, Pelvic Exenteration/methods, Postoperative Complications/etiology, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, complications, critical care, health-related quality of life, pelvic exenteration
1462-8910
West, Charles T.
f55ef5be-4040-4c3a-978e-d0ce1eaeb366
Salem, Yousif
dfc6a232-7529-4bc0-865d-6ab3492284aa
Jain, Siddharth
7db535e2-d992-4275-99b5-b23379cc5865
Matthews, Lewis
81327a4c-b2a8-44f9-b5b2-fc04f856a930
Smith, Julian
f2fd1d1c-c41f-4af7-8307-5418aca20757
Nicolaou, Marios
6e4595bc-6230-47cd-beab-6bd92b2d1a68
Yano, Hideaki
2266fac8-36d2-49a3-a146-da74b2eb4e3a
West, Malcolm A.
98b67e58-9875-4133-b236-8a10a0a12c04
Mirnezami, Alex H.
b3c7aee7-46a4-404c-bfe3-f72388e0bc94
West, Charles T.
f55ef5be-4040-4c3a-978e-d0ce1eaeb366
Salem, Yousif
dfc6a232-7529-4bc0-865d-6ab3492284aa
Jain, Siddharth
7db535e2-d992-4275-99b5-b23379cc5865
Matthews, Lewis
81327a4c-b2a8-44f9-b5b2-fc04f856a930
Smith, Julian
f2fd1d1c-c41f-4af7-8307-5418aca20757
Nicolaou, Marios
6e4595bc-6230-47cd-beab-6bd92b2d1a68
Yano, Hideaki
2266fac8-36d2-49a3-a146-da74b2eb4e3a
West, Malcolm A.
98b67e58-9875-4133-b236-8a10a0a12c04
Mirnezami, Alex H.
b3c7aee7-46a4-404c-bfe3-f72388e0bc94

West, Charles T., Salem, Yousif, Jain, Siddharth, Matthews, Lewis, Smith, Julian, Nicolaou, Marios, Yano, Hideaki, West, Malcolm A. and Mirnezami, Alex H. (2026) Prospective case-control cohort analysis of two-day/two-stage pelvic exenteration surgery: safety, feasibility, acceptability and medium-term outcomes. Colorectal Disease, 28 (1), [e70353]. (doi:10.1111/codi.70353).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Aim: pelvic exenteration (PE) is the only curative option for extensive pelvic cancers. Advances have facilitated increasingly complex resectional and reconstructive components, including per-operative oncological adjuncts such as intraoperative radiotherapy. Cumulatively, these components increase operative duration beyond what is feasible within a single conventional operating day. Two-day/two-stage PE addresses this, but little is known about this approach. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety and medium-term outcomes of a two-day/two-stage PE.

Method: consecutive patients (2010-2025) from a prospectively maintained high-volume PE unit database (n = 373) undergoing two-day/two-stage PE were compared against a matched control cohort of single-day cases lasting ≥15 h. EQ5D-5L and decision regret scores were longitudinally collected after 2021. Surgical, oncological and health-related quality-of-life outcomes were evaluated.

Results: twenty-seven patients underwent two-day/two-stage PE, and 38 had one-day PE; more anal cancers were in the two-day/two-stage group (p = 0.012); median follow-up was 24.2 months. No 90-day mortalities occurred; 3-year overall survival was 54.4% for two-day/two-stage PE and 70.5% for one-day PE (p = 0.31); and R0-resection rates were 82% and 76%, respectively (p = 0.76). Major morbidity occurred in 56% and 47% (p = 0.62), with a median length of stay of 37 and 27 days (p = 0.07) and intensive care days of 5 and 3 (p = 0.08). 12-month EQ5D-5L utility scores were 0.79 and 0.81 (p = 0.96), with low 12-month decision regret in both groups (p = 0.15).

Conclusion: two-day/two-stage PE is safe and feasible, potentially representing the only option for highly selected patients needing high-complexity PE with multiple components. Although equivalent R0-resections were obtained, medium-term oncological outcomes were poorer in patients undergoing two-day/two-stage interventions.

Text
Colorectal Disease - 2026 - West - Prospective case‐control cohort analysis of two‐day two‐stage pelvic exenteration - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 December 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 29 December 2025
Published date: January 2026
Keywords: Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Case-Control Studies, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data, Male, Middle Aged, Operative Time, Pelvic Exenteration/methods, Postoperative Complications/etiology, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, complications, critical care, health-related quality of life, pelvic exenteration

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 510056
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/510056
ISSN: 1462-8910
PURE UUID: 35370f43-d48e-4017-b51c-ebc06baef000
ORCID for Malcolm A. West: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0345-5356

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Mar 2026 17:51
Last modified: 17 Mar 2026 02:53

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Charles T. West
Author: Yousif Salem
Author: Siddharth Jain
Author: Lewis Matthews
Author: Julian Smith
Author: Marios Nicolaou
Author: Hideaki Yano
Author: Malcolm A. West ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×