The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Improving motivation to change amongst individuals with eating disorders: a systematic review

Improving motivation to change amongst individuals with eating disorders: a systematic review
Improving motivation to change amongst individuals with eating disorders: a systematic review
Objective
People with eating disorders can have low motivation to change their eating disorder behaviors. Interventions aiming to enhance motivation to change have been increasingly advocated in their treatment. Questions remain regarding the strength of the evidence supporting the effectiveness of interventions that specifically focus on improving motivation. This review explored the evidence for improving motivation to change in eating disorders via clinical interventions.

Method
Searches of the published and unpublished literature were conducted by searching databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, Web of Science) and trial registries (WHO ICTRP), and by contacting authors. Studies were included if they investigated an intervention for eating disorder patients, included a pre-post outcome measure of motivation to change and were published in English. Risk of bias was also assessed.

Results
Forty-two studies were included in the final review. Evidence was found to support the use of interventions to improve motivation to change, though it was unclear whether motivational interventions present a more effective option than approaches that do not exclusively or specifically focus on motivation. However, motivational interventions were identified as being more effective than low intensity treatments. Risk of bias in included studies was generally high.

Discussion
Motivation was found to increase across treatments in general, whether or not the focus of the intervention was on enhancing motivation. It is unclear if interventions specifically targeting motivation to change provide additional benefit over and above established treatment approaches.
0276-3478
1033-1050
Denison-Day, James
49c0d012-eadc-44eb-b06c-da7714be145a
Appleton, Katherine M
2f01b8e5-09c9-47df-80ab-be2a10291e80
Newell, Ciarán
a69c9113-8da6-4e8c-84b6-cf55d1dbad7f
Muir, Sarah
019137d3-2f8c-406c-ac6e-2c57ddd6ce32
Denison-Day, James
49c0d012-eadc-44eb-b06c-da7714be145a
Appleton, Katherine M
2f01b8e5-09c9-47df-80ab-be2a10291e80
Newell, Ciarán
a69c9113-8da6-4e8c-84b6-cf55d1dbad7f
Muir, Sarah
019137d3-2f8c-406c-ac6e-2c57ddd6ce32

Denison-Day, James, Appleton, Katherine M, Newell, Ciarán and Muir, Sarah (2018) Improving motivation to change amongst individuals with eating disorders: a systematic review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 51 (9), 1033-1050. (doi:10.1002/eat.22945).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective
People with eating disorders can have low motivation to change their eating disorder behaviors. Interventions aiming to enhance motivation to change have been increasingly advocated in their treatment. Questions remain regarding the strength of the evidence supporting the effectiveness of interventions that specifically focus on improving motivation. This review explored the evidence for improving motivation to change in eating disorders via clinical interventions.

Method
Searches of the published and unpublished literature were conducted by searching databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, Web of Science) and trial registries (WHO ICTRP), and by contacting authors. Studies were included if they investigated an intervention for eating disorder patients, included a pre-post outcome measure of motivation to change and were published in English. Risk of bias was also assessed.

Results
Forty-two studies were included in the final review. Evidence was found to support the use of interventions to improve motivation to change, though it was unclear whether motivational interventions present a more effective option than approaches that do not exclusively or specifically focus on motivation. However, motivational interventions were identified as being more effective than low intensity treatments. Risk of bias in included studies was generally high.

Discussion
Motivation was found to increase across treatments in general, whether or not the focus of the intervention was on enhancing motivation. It is unclear if interventions specifically targeting motivation to change provide additional benefit over and above established treatment approaches.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 6 September 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 510335
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/510335
ISSN: 0276-3478
PURE UUID: a7d4089a-fee4-4fd8-b7c5-302ba0d508fb
ORCID for James Denison-Day: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0223-0005
ORCID for Sarah Muir: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7444-7321

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Mar 2026 17:48
Last modified: 27 Mar 2026 02:58

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Katherine M Appleton
Author: Ciarán Newell
Author: Sarah Muir ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×