The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab/irinotecan/temozolomide (BIT) for relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma: the UK Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group experience

The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab/irinotecan/temozolomide (BIT) for relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma: the UK Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group experience
The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab/irinotecan/temozolomide (BIT) for relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma: the UK Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group experience
Background: patients with high-risk neuroblastoma who either are refractory to induction chemotherapy or relapse following multi-modal treatment have a dismal prognosis. Based on data from the BEACON trial, since 2021 the UK national guidelines recommend bevacizumab, irinotecan, and temozolomide (BIT) for patients with relapsed/refractory disease.

Methods: a retrospective UK national study of patients under 25 years with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma treated with BIT 1/3/2021-28/02/25.

Results: sixty-six patients were included from 15 UK centres; 40 (61%) had relapsed disease, 23 at first relapse. Overall objective response rate was 40.6% [95% CI: 28.5%–53.6%] and was higher in patients with refractory versus relapsed disease (56% vs. 31%, p = 0.068). Objective responses were achieved within six cycles for over 90%. Seventeen of 26 (65%) patients with primary refractory disease received high-dose chemotherapy with busulfan/melphalan and autologous stem cell rescue. Nine required additional therapies after BIT before they could proceed to high-dose treatment, and eight required BIT alone. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in refractory patients (median PFS 13.2 vs. 5.1 months, p = 0.012, median OS not reached by 3 years vs. 12.5 months, p = 0.0003). The most common CTCAE5.0 Grade 3–4 toxicities were anaemia (32%), neutropenic fever (23%) and diarrhoea (13.6%). One patient discontinued treatment due to toxicity (diarrhoea).

Conclusions: the promising efficacy and tolerability of BIT reported by the BEACON trial are reproduced in real-world data with a larger cohort. Further randomised studies are needed to separately identify optimal treatment strategies for relapsed and refractory disease.
1545-5017
Jackson, Thomas J.
e731cecb-5b71-4506-875e-c2449f323d28
Shamma, Menna
Senanayake, Upeka
Gray, Juliet
12d5e17c-97bb-4d6d-8fc4-3914b730ed42
et al.
Jackson, Thomas J.
e731cecb-5b71-4506-875e-c2449f323d28
Shamma, Menna
Senanayake, Upeka
Gray, Juliet
12d5e17c-97bb-4d6d-8fc4-3914b730ed42

Jackson, Thomas J., Shamma, Menna and Senanayake, Upeka , et al. (2026) The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab/irinotecan/temozolomide (BIT) for relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma: the UK Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group experience. Pediatric Blood and Cancer. (doi:10.1002/1545-5017.70226).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: patients with high-risk neuroblastoma who either are refractory to induction chemotherapy or relapse following multi-modal treatment have a dismal prognosis. Based on data from the BEACON trial, since 2021 the UK national guidelines recommend bevacizumab, irinotecan, and temozolomide (BIT) for patients with relapsed/refractory disease.

Methods: a retrospective UK national study of patients under 25 years with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma treated with BIT 1/3/2021-28/02/25.

Results: sixty-six patients were included from 15 UK centres; 40 (61%) had relapsed disease, 23 at first relapse. Overall objective response rate was 40.6% [95% CI: 28.5%–53.6%] and was higher in patients with refractory versus relapsed disease (56% vs. 31%, p = 0.068). Objective responses were achieved within six cycles for over 90%. Seventeen of 26 (65%) patients with primary refractory disease received high-dose chemotherapy with busulfan/melphalan and autologous stem cell rescue. Nine required additional therapies after BIT before they could proceed to high-dose treatment, and eight required BIT alone. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in refractory patients (median PFS 13.2 vs. 5.1 months, p = 0.012, median OS not reached by 3 years vs. 12.5 months, p = 0.0003). The most common CTCAE5.0 Grade 3–4 toxicities were anaemia (32%), neutropenic fever (23%) and diarrhoea (13.6%). One patient discontinued treatment due to toxicity (diarrhoea).

Conclusions: the promising efficacy and tolerability of BIT reported by the BEACON trial are reproduced in real-world data with a larger cohort. Further randomised studies are needed to separately identify optimal treatment strategies for relapsed and refractory disease.

Text
ab90804b-2cf4-41e5-a918-3d0061d6840a - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (934kB)
Text
Pediatric Blood Cancer - 2026 - Jackson - The Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Irinotecan Temozolomide BIT for - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (768kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 16 February 2026
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 March 2026

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 510420
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/510420
ISSN: 1545-5017
PURE UUID: c827b29a-2060-433c-a7ba-9bb9e3590cf6
ORCID for Juliet Gray: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5652-4722

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Mar 2026 17:00
Last modified: 31 Mar 2026 01:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Thomas J. Jackson
Author: Menna Shamma
Author: Upeka Senanayake
Author: Juliet Gray ORCID iD
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×