The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

How well do older adult fitness technologies match user needs and preferences? Scoping review of 2014-2024 literature

How well do older adult fitness technologies match user needs and preferences? Scoping review of 2014-2024 literature
How well do older adult fitness technologies match user needs and preferences? Scoping review of 2014-2024 literature
Background: the population is aging, and research on maintaining older adult independent living is growing in interest. Digital technologies have been developed to support older adults’ independent living through fitness. However, reviews of current fitness technologies for older adults indicate that the success is considerably limited.

Objective: this scoping review investigates older adult fitness by comparing current interventions to known needs and preferences of older adults from older adult–specific technology acceptance research, barriers and enablers to physical activity, and qualitative research on fitness technologies. The review questions are (1) How well do current older adult fitness technologies align with known preferences? (2) How well do current research methodologies evaluate the known needs and preferences?

Methods: research papers from the last 10 years were searched in the ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Medline, and PsycINFO databases using keywords related to older adults, technology, and exercise. Papers were only included if they specifically evaluated fitness technologies, focused on older adults, and mentioned a specific technology used in the intervention. To evaluate the fitness interventions, an assessment tool, the Older Adult Fitness Technology Translation Assessment tool, was synthesized through literature on technology acceptance, barriers and enablers to physical activity, and qualitative research on fitness technologies. Interventions were scored by 5 reviewers using a dual-review approach.

Results: a total of 43 research papers were selected:16 from medical journals, 15 from engineering journals, 7 from human-computer interaction journals, 3 from public health, and 2 from combined computing and engineering journals. The Older Adult Fitness Technology Translation Assessment tool contained six assessment factors: (1) compatibility with lifestyle, (2) similarity with experience, (3) dignity and independence, (4) privacy concerns, (5) social support, and (6) emotion. The average scores of the 6 factors were 2.93 (SD 0.86) on compatibility with lifestyle, 3.10 (SD 0.74) on similarity to experience, 3.49 (SD 0.64) on dignity and independence, 3.17 (SD 0.86) on privacy concerns, 3.74 (SD 0.81) on short-term outcomes, 2.75 (SD 1.21) on long-term outcomes, 2.79 (SD 0.88) on social support, and 3.17 (SD 1.19) on emotion. No research paper scored a 3 or above on all 6 factors.

Conclusions: the results show a lack of alignment between the known preferences of older adults and the design and assessment of current older adult fitness technologies. Areas for growth include (1) alignment between the needs of older adults and fitness technology intervention design, (2) translation of findings from older adult design work to designs in practice, and (3) explicit usage of older adult–specific factors in research. We hypothesize that the proposed Older Adult Fitness Technology Translation Assessment tool can help bridge the gap between technological capability and real-world applicability, ultimately fostering greater acceptance, respect, and long-term success.
1438-8871
Tacca, Christopher
91179df2-4deb-40fa-9762-9077d9e05210
Galvez, Arturo Vazquez
acf2be17-823d-4e16-b85c-1e5d83cd9e94
Thompson, Isobel Margaret
6de8a45c-4a09-415c-aef7-be8f96a6f47c
Bincalar, Alexander Dawid
83db8900-eb92-4261-9d57-dab3a1657705
Tremmel, Christoph
79c2855c-6daf-43b7-80f9-bc2bbf85084e
Gomer, Richard
71c5969f-2da0-47ab-b2fb-a7e1d07836b1
Warner, Martin
f4dce73d-fb87-4f71-a3f0-078123aa040c
Freeman, Chris
ccdd1272-cdc7-43fb-a1bb-b1ef0bdf5815
schraefel, m.c
ac304659-1692-47f6-b892-15113b8c929f
Tacca, Christopher
91179df2-4deb-40fa-9762-9077d9e05210
Galvez, Arturo Vazquez
acf2be17-823d-4e16-b85c-1e5d83cd9e94
Thompson, Isobel Margaret
6de8a45c-4a09-415c-aef7-be8f96a6f47c
Bincalar, Alexander Dawid
83db8900-eb92-4261-9d57-dab3a1657705
Tremmel, Christoph
79c2855c-6daf-43b7-80f9-bc2bbf85084e
Gomer, Richard
71c5969f-2da0-47ab-b2fb-a7e1d07836b1
Warner, Martin
f4dce73d-fb87-4f71-a3f0-078123aa040c
Freeman, Chris
ccdd1272-cdc7-43fb-a1bb-b1ef0bdf5815
schraefel, m.c
ac304659-1692-47f6-b892-15113b8c929f

Tacca, Christopher, Galvez, Arturo Vazquez, Thompson, Isobel Margaret, Bincalar, Alexander Dawid, Tremmel, Christoph, Gomer, Richard, Warner, Martin, Freeman, Chris and schraefel, m.c (2025) How well do older adult fitness technologies match user needs and preferences? Scoping review of 2014-2024 literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27. (doi:10.2196/75667).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the population is aging, and research on maintaining older adult independent living is growing in interest. Digital technologies have been developed to support older adults’ independent living through fitness. However, reviews of current fitness technologies for older adults indicate that the success is considerably limited.

Objective: this scoping review investigates older adult fitness by comparing current interventions to known needs and preferences of older adults from older adult–specific technology acceptance research, barriers and enablers to physical activity, and qualitative research on fitness technologies. The review questions are (1) How well do current older adult fitness technologies align with known preferences? (2) How well do current research methodologies evaluate the known needs and preferences?

Methods: research papers from the last 10 years were searched in the ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Medline, and PsycINFO databases using keywords related to older adults, technology, and exercise. Papers were only included if they specifically evaluated fitness technologies, focused on older adults, and mentioned a specific technology used in the intervention. To evaluate the fitness interventions, an assessment tool, the Older Adult Fitness Technology Translation Assessment tool, was synthesized through literature on technology acceptance, barriers and enablers to physical activity, and qualitative research on fitness technologies. Interventions were scored by 5 reviewers using a dual-review approach.

Results: a total of 43 research papers were selected:16 from medical journals, 15 from engineering journals, 7 from human-computer interaction journals, 3 from public health, and 2 from combined computing and engineering journals. The Older Adult Fitness Technology Translation Assessment tool contained six assessment factors: (1) compatibility with lifestyle, (2) similarity with experience, (3) dignity and independence, (4) privacy concerns, (5) social support, and (6) emotion. The average scores of the 6 factors were 2.93 (SD 0.86) on compatibility with lifestyle, 3.10 (SD 0.74) on similarity to experience, 3.49 (SD 0.64) on dignity and independence, 3.17 (SD 0.86) on privacy concerns, 3.74 (SD 0.81) on short-term outcomes, 2.75 (SD 1.21) on long-term outcomes, 2.79 (SD 0.88) on social support, and 3.17 (SD 1.19) on emotion. No research paper scored a 3 or above on all 6 factors.

Conclusions: the results show a lack of alignment between the known preferences of older adults and the design and assessment of current older adult fitness technologies. Areas for growth include (1) alignment between the needs of older adults and fitness technology intervention design, (2) translation of findings from older adult design work to designs in practice, and (3) explicit usage of older adult–specific factors in research. We hypothesize that the proposed Older Adult Fitness Technology Translation Assessment tool can help bridge the gap between technological capability and real-world applicability, ultimately fostering greater acceptance, respect, and long-term success.

Text
jmir-2025-1-e75667 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (547kB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 8 April 2025
Published date: 24 September 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 510428
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/510428
ISSN: 1438-8871
PURE UUID: 1e599170-23ee-4bda-a056-01786c4b3952
ORCID for Christopher Tacca: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8715-9166
ORCID for Isobel Margaret Thompson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2788-1675
ORCID for Christoph Tremmel: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0324-6626
ORCID for Richard Gomer: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8866-3738
ORCID for Martin Warner: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1483-0561
ORCID for Chris Freeman: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0305-9246
ORCID for m.c schraefel: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9061-7957

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Mar 2026 16:38
Last modified: 01 Apr 2026 02:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Christopher Tacca ORCID iD
Author: Arturo Vazquez Galvez
Author: Isobel Margaret Thompson ORCID iD
Author: Alexander Dawid Bincalar
Author: Christoph Tremmel ORCID iD
Author: Richard Gomer ORCID iD
Author: Martin Warner ORCID iD
Author: Chris Freeman ORCID iD
Author: m.c schraefel ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×