The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Does real time variability in inhibitory control drive snacking behavior? An intensive longitudinal study

Does real time variability in inhibitory control drive snacking behavior? An intensive longitudinal study
Does real time variability in inhibitory control drive snacking behavior? An intensive longitudinal study
Objective: Laboratory eating studies and cross-sectional surveys indicate individuals with inefficient executive function (EF) consume more unhealthy snacks than others. However, the importance of EF in determining snacking behavior in the ‘real world’ has not been established. Contemporary behavioral and self-control theories posit EF as a dynamic resource fluctuating over time. Consequently, a test of the relevance of EF to behavior within individuals is required. This study tested within- and between-person effects of real-time variability in objectively-measured inhibitory control (a core facet of EF) on subsequent snacking behavior in daily life. Methods: A community sample of 64 adults recorded snacking behavior and completed a short Go/No-Go test (assessing inhibitory control) hourly over 7 consecutive days, yielding a total well-powered sample of 6284 data-points. Generalized linear mixed models using lagged effects examined within-person and between-person effects of inhibitory control efficiency on snacking behavior. Results: When Go/No-Go test responses were 100 ms slower than the person-mean (indicating periods of poorer inhibitory control), snack consumption in the following hour was 25.67% higher, Exp (γ) = 1.26, p = .002, 95% CI [1.06, 1.49]. Between-individuals, person-mean reaction time did not predict snack consumption, Exp (γ) = 1.02, p = .965, 95% CI [0.71, 1.46]. Conclusions: Real-time variability in inhibitory control efficiency is highly relevant to snacking behavior within individuals. Inhibitory control is an important driver of snacking in everyday life and an important target for interventions.
0278-6133
Powell, Daniel J H
e1e53a46-a37b-425b-ac15-e82f99033f46
McMinn, David
1a7d54ef-5a23-48bd-b710-876b88ce75d2
Allan, Julia L.
2b98cce8-6e9a-436f-b8d2-e25d2f41ccbe
Powell, Daniel J H
e1e53a46-a37b-425b-ac15-e82f99033f46
McMinn, David
1a7d54ef-5a23-48bd-b710-876b88ce75d2
Allan, Julia L.
2b98cce8-6e9a-436f-b8d2-e25d2f41ccbe

Powell, Daniel J H, McMinn, David and Allan, Julia L. (2017) Does real time variability in inhibitory control drive snacking behavior? An intensive longitudinal study. Health Psychology. (doi:10.1037/hea0000471).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: Laboratory eating studies and cross-sectional surveys indicate individuals with inefficient executive function (EF) consume more unhealthy snacks than others. However, the importance of EF in determining snacking behavior in the ‘real world’ has not been established. Contemporary behavioral and self-control theories posit EF as a dynamic resource fluctuating over time. Consequently, a test of the relevance of EF to behavior within individuals is required. This study tested within- and between-person effects of real-time variability in objectively-measured inhibitory control (a core facet of EF) on subsequent snacking behavior in daily life. Methods: A community sample of 64 adults recorded snacking behavior and completed a short Go/No-Go test (assessing inhibitory control) hourly over 7 consecutive days, yielding a total well-powered sample of 6284 data-points. Generalized linear mixed models using lagged effects examined within-person and between-person effects of inhibitory control efficiency on snacking behavior. Results: When Go/No-Go test responses were 100 ms slower than the person-mean (indicating periods of poorer inhibitory control), snack consumption in the following hour was 25.67% higher, Exp (γ) = 1.26, p = .002, 95% CI [1.06, 1.49]. Between-individuals, person-mean reaction time did not predict snack consumption, Exp (γ) = 1.02, p = .965, 95% CI [0.71, 1.46]. Conclusions: Real-time variability in inhibitory control efficiency is highly relevant to snacking behavior within individuals. Inhibitory control is an important driver of snacking in everyday life and an important target for interventions.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: April 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 510469
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/510469
ISSN: 0278-6133
PURE UUID: 6b07869e-a91f-48ec-accc-2251b6f39e75
ORCID for Daniel J H Powell: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4995-6057

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Apr 2026 09:34
Last modified: 14 Apr 2026 02:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Daniel J H Powell ORCID iD
Author: David McMinn
Author: Julia L. Allan

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×