The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

We are what we (think we) eat: the effect of expected satiety on subsequent calorie consumption

We are what we (think we) eat: the effect of expected satiety on subsequent calorie consumption
We are what we (think we) eat: the effect of expected satiety on subsequent calorie consumption
Varying expected satiety (ES) for equi-calorie portions of different foods can affect subsequent feelings of hunger and fullness and alter consumption. To our knowledge, no study has manipulated ES for an equal portion of the same solid food, appetite has not been measured >3 hours and studies have not consistently measure later consumption. It is also unclear whether changes in hunger, fullness or later consumption are related to a physiological response. The aims of this study were to use the same solid food, to measure participants' response over a 4-hour inter-meal period, to measure later consumption and to assess whether any effect of ES was related to a physiological (i.e. total ghrelin) response. Using a within-subjects design, 26 healthy participants had their ES for omelettes manipulated experimentally, believing that a 3-egg omelette contained either 2 (small condition) or 4 (large condition) eggs. When ES was higher (large condition) participants ate significantly fewer calories at a lunchtime test meal (mean difference = 69kcal [± 95% CI 4 - 136]) and consumed significantly fewer calories throughout the day (mean difference = 167kcal [± 95% CI 26 - 309]). As expected, there was a main effect of time on hunger and fullness, but no main effect of 'portion size' (p> .05). There was also a significant interaction between time and portion size for hunger. There was no evidence for any significant differences being the result of changes in total ghrelin. Overall, the data suggest that ES for a solid food can be manipulated and that, when given at breakfast, having a higher ES for a meal reduces lunchtime and whole day caloric consumption.
0195-6663
Brown, S.D.
18343a1b-f58c-42f7-840d-5bddc8eb2dbd
Duncan, J.
dea779b6-e7d8-45eb-837b-d59c3ebf53e4
Crabtree, D.
693b6a50-6fc9-4fa7-9fb3-5571326ecb8f
Powell, D.
e1e53a46-a37b-425b-ac15-e82f99033f46
Hudson, M.
cd138314-9032-48df-8a34-ef6034297d76
Allan, J.L.
2b98cce8-6e9a-436f-b8d2-e25d2f41ccbe
Brown, S.D.
18343a1b-f58c-42f7-840d-5bddc8eb2dbd
Duncan, J.
dea779b6-e7d8-45eb-837b-d59c3ebf53e4
Crabtree, D.
693b6a50-6fc9-4fa7-9fb3-5571326ecb8f
Powell, D.
e1e53a46-a37b-425b-ac15-e82f99033f46
Hudson, M.
cd138314-9032-48df-8a34-ef6034297d76
Allan, J.L.
2b98cce8-6e9a-436f-b8d2-e25d2f41ccbe

Brown, S.D., Duncan, J., Crabtree, D., Powell, D., Hudson, M. and Allan, J.L. (2020) We are what we (think we) eat: the effect of expected satiety on subsequent calorie consumption. Appetite, 152, [104717]. (doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104717).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Varying expected satiety (ES) for equi-calorie portions of different foods can affect subsequent feelings of hunger and fullness and alter consumption. To our knowledge, no study has manipulated ES for an equal portion of the same solid food, appetite has not been measured >3 hours and studies have not consistently measure later consumption. It is also unclear whether changes in hunger, fullness or later consumption are related to a physiological response. The aims of this study were to use the same solid food, to measure participants' response over a 4-hour inter-meal period, to measure later consumption and to assess whether any effect of ES was related to a physiological (i.e. total ghrelin) response. Using a within-subjects design, 26 healthy participants had their ES for omelettes manipulated experimentally, believing that a 3-egg omelette contained either 2 (small condition) or 4 (large condition) eggs. When ES was higher (large condition) participants ate significantly fewer calories at a lunchtime test meal (mean difference = 69kcal [± 95% CI 4 - 136]) and consumed significantly fewer calories throughout the day (mean difference = 167kcal [± 95% CI 26 - 309]). As expected, there was a main effect of time on hunger and fullness, but no main effect of 'portion size' (p> .05). There was also a significant interaction between time and portion size for hunger. There was no evidence for any significant differences being the result of changes in total ghrelin. Overall, the data suggest that ES for a solid food can be manipulated and that, when given at breakfast, having a higher ES for a meal reduces lunchtime and whole day caloric consumption.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 15 April 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 April 2020
Published date: 8 May 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 510479
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/510479
ISSN: 0195-6663
PURE UUID: 766cd2b1-bf0a-4290-a8aa-c370deb4577e
ORCID for D. Powell: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4995-6057

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Apr 2026 09:43
Last modified: 14 Apr 2026 02:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: S.D. Brown
Author: J. Duncan
Author: D. Crabtree
Author: D. Powell ORCID iD
Author: M. Hudson
Author: J.L. Allan

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×