The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evaluating disaster risk management in Saudi Arabian public hospitals: perceptions and practices

Evaluating disaster risk management in Saudi Arabian public hospitals: perceptions and practices
Evaluating disaster risk management in Saudi Arabian public hospitals: perceptions and practices
This thesis examines disaster risk management (DRM) within public hospitals in Saudi Arabia through the perceptions of healthcare workers (HCWs) and the public. Public hospitals face major DRM challenges, including mass religious gatherings, industrial risks, and regional disparities. While global developmental frameworks (e.g., Sendai Framework, WHO Health Emergency & DRM Framework) emphasise preparedness, resilience, and trust, it remains unclear how stakeholder perceptions can inform effective DRM in Saudi Arabia. To address this issue, a multi-method design was employed across three studies to assess perceptions of DRM, and their implications for healthcare resilience. In Study One, 542 HCWs from 22 public hospitals across four regions were surveyed to assess their perceptions of DRM effectiveness across the four phases. Overall, HCWs rated mitigation as the most effective function and preparedness as the weakest. Significant regional disparities were identified: HCWs in the Central and Eastern regions reported greater confidence across all four phases compared with those in the Southern region. In Study Two, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 HCWs to examine how individual experiences, and organisational, geographical, and systemic factors shaped perceptions. Thematic analysis of the interviews indicated that strong leadership, effective communication, and ongoing training enhanced confidence in DRM, whereas poor infrastructure, weak departmental collaboration, and lack of psychological support reduced confidence. In Study Three, 436 members of the public were surveyed to examine trust in hospital DRM, focusing on four areas: perceived preparedness, knowledge of initiatives, quality of communication, and perceived satisfaction with hospital DRM. Perceived satisfaction and preparedness were strongest predictors of trust, followed by knowledge of initiatives, though communication alone had less significance. Collectively, these studies indicate that DRM practices in Saudi public hospitals can be shaped substantially by organisational, systemic, and perceptual factors. The findings suggest that key factors for the effective improvement of hospital resilience include inclusive leadership, equitable resource distribution, transparent risk communication, and proactive public engagement. These are all critical factors for preparing healthcare systems to respond to future crises.
University of Southampton
Alshehri, Shahad Ali S
0bdd3f22-db10-4f2b-9cef-7bdb74c832b8
Alshehri, Shahad Ali S
0bdd3f22-db10-4f2b-9cef-7bdb74c832b8
Dawson, Ian
dff1b440-6c83-4354-92b6-04809460b01a
Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos
b97c23d9-8b24-4225-8da4-be7ac2a14fba

Alshehri, Shahad Ali S (2026) Evaluating disaster risk management in Saudi Arabian public hospitals: perceptions and practices. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 324pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This thesis examines disaster risk management (DRM) within public hospitals in Saudi Arabia through the perceptions of healthcare workers (HCWs) and the public. Public hospitals face major DRM challenges, including mass religious gatherings, industrial risks, and regional disparities. While global developmental frameworks (e.g., Sendai Framework, WHO Health Emergency & DRM Framework) emphasise preparedness, resilience, and trust, it remains unclear how stakeholder perceptions can inform effective DRM in Saudi Arabia. To address this issue, a multi-method design was employed across three studies to assess perceptions of DRM, and their implications for healthcare resilience. In Study One, 542 HCWs from 22 public hospitals across four regions were surveyed to assess their perceptions of DRM effectiveness across the four phases. Overall, HCWs rated mitigation as the most effective function and preparedness as the weakest. Significant regional disparities were identified: HCWs in the Central and Eastern regions reported greater confidence across all four phases compared with those in the Southern region. In Study Two, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 HCWs to examine how individual experiences, and organisational, geographical, and systemic factors shaped perceptions. Thematic analysis of the interviews indicated that strong leadership, effective communication, and ongoing training enhanced confidence in DRM, whereas poor infrastructure, weak departmental collaboration, and lack of psychological support reduced confidence. In Study Three, 436 members of the public were surveyed to examine trust in hospital DRM, focusing on four areas: perceived preparedness, knowledge of initiatives, quality of communication, and perceived satisfaction with hospital DRM. Perceived satisfaction and preparedness were strongest predictors of trust, followed by knowledge of initiatives, though communication alone had less significance. Collectively, these studies indicate that DRM practices in Saudi public hospitals can be shaped substantially by organisational, systemic, and perceptual factors. The findings suggest that key factors for the effective improvement of hospital resilience include inclusive leadership, equitable resource distribution, transparent risk communication, and proactive public engagement. These are all critical factors for preparing healthcare systems to respond to future crises.

Text
Shahad Alshehri- Final -March2026- PDF:A - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (1MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Miss-Shahad-Alshehri
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Submitted date: 2026

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 510511
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/510511
PURE UUID: caa5753c-8c12-4b78-9df4-3e2fdd8e425b
ORCID for Shahad Ali S Alshehri: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0007-4468-2807
ORCID for Ian Dawson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0555-9682
ORCID for Konstantinos Katsikopoulos: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9572-1980

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Apr 2026 10:35
Last modified: 14 Apr 2026 02:05

Export record

Contributors

Author: Shahad Ali S Alshehri ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Ian Dawson ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Konstantinos Katsikopoulos ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×