The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

An environment and comprehensive wellbeing (ECW) conceptual framework: exploring environmental relationships with objective and subjective wellbeing

An environment and comprehensive wellbeing (ECW) conceptual framework: exploring environmental relationships with objective and subjective wellbeing
An environment and comprehensive wellbeing (ECW) conceptual framework: exploring environmental relationships with objective and subjective wellbeing
Wellbeing and environment are inherently interlinked and, as such, should be supported by a framework that captures multiple relationships between people and ecosystems. A comprehensive wellbeing assessment encompasses broad objective and subjective indicators which account for local community and governance priorities, and acknowledge wellbeing as relational to the time and space it is constructed. While existing frameworks address components of the environment-wellbeing system, they often do not incorporate comprehensive wellbeing within an environmental context. The Environment and Comprehensive Wellbeing framework addresses this gap, supporting research on the impacts of climatic hazards, landscape characteristics, and environmental policy interventions upon wellbeing in low- and middle-income countries. The framework is novel in its exploration of how objective and subjective wellbeing interact, and how the relational context, including environmental conditions over various timescales, impact these relationships. Despite being primarily designed to explore local wellbeing, the framework contains sufficient breadth to facilitate multiscale research. The framework is applied to a mixed-method example in Volta Delta, Ghana. The prominence of subsistence agriculture within the environmentally vulnerable delta accentuates the interconnectivity between livelihoods, wellbeing and environment. Applying this novel framework provides a platform for a deeper understanding of the findings. For example, a context-specific dichotomy between low objective and high subjective wellbeing was illustrated in drought-impacted agricultural areas. Research deploying an exclusively objective approach may have omitted information on how collective community norms could promote sustainable activities, while a subjective approach may have overlooked requirements for more-immediate material support, highlighting the synergistic benefit of encompassing subjective and objective wellbeing.
Climate, Comprehensive wellbeing, Environment, Framework, Objective wellbeing, Subjective wellbeing
0199-0039
Cannings, Laurence Patrick
d41b8fad-ab5e-4fd2-b96b-8d96834e2e8a
Hutton, Craig
9102617b-caf7-4538-9414-c29e72f5fe2e
Nilsen, Kristine
306e0bd5-8139-47db-be97-47fe15f0c03b
Cannings, Laurence Patrick
d41b8fad-ab5e-4fd2-b96b-8d96834e2e8a
Hutton, Craig
9102617b-caf7-4538-9414-c29e72f5fe2e
Nilsen, Kristine
306e0bd5-8139-47db-be97-47fe15f0c03b

Cannings, Laurence Patrick, Hutton, Craig and Nilsen, Kristine (2026) An environment and comprehensive wellbeing (ECW) conceptual framework: exploring environmental relationships with objective and subjective wellbeing. Population and Environment, 48 (6), [6]. (doi:10.1007/s11111-026-00518-w).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Wellbeing and environment are inherently interlinked and, as such, should be supported by a framework that captures multiple relationships between people and ecosystems. A comprehensive wellbeing assessment encompasses broad objective and subjective indicators which account for local community and governance priorities, and acknowledge wellbeing as relational to the time and space it is constructed. While existing frameworks address components of the environment-wellbeing system, they often do not incorporate comprehensive wellbeing within an environmental context. The Environment and Comprehensive Wellbeing framework addresses this gap, supporting research on the impacts of climatic hazards, landscape characteristics, and environmental policy interventions upon wellbeing in low- and middle-income countries. The framework is novel in its exploration of how objective and subjective wellbeing interact, and how the relational context, including environmental conditions over various timescales, impact these relationships. Despite being primarily designed to explore local wellbeing, the framework contains sufficient breadth to facilitate multiscale research. The framework is applied to a mixed-method example in Volta Delta, Ghana. The prominence of subsistence agriculture within the environmentally vulnerable delta accentuates the interconnectivity between livelihoods, wellbeing and environment. Applying this novel framework provides a platform for a deeper understanding of the findings. For example, a context-specific dichotomy between low objective and high subjective wellbeing was illustrated in drought-impacted agricultural areas. Research deploying an exclusively objective approach may have omitted information on how collective community norms could promote sustainable activities, while a subjective approach may have overlooked requirements for more-immediate material support, highlighting the synergistic benefit of encompassing subjective and objective wellbeing.

Text
s11111-026-00518-w - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 13 February 2026
Published date: 28 March 2026
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2026.
Keywords: Climate, Comprehensive wellbeing, Environment, Framework, Objective wellbeing, Subjective wellbeing

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 510648
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/510648
ISSN: 0199-0039
PURE UUID: 7268b462-07d2-4921-a97b-e0f1bfbf2f53
ORCID for Laurence Patrick Cannings: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1149-5833
ORCID for Craig Hutton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5896-756X
ORCID for Kristine Nilsen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2009-4019

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Apr 2026 16:36
Last modified: 18 Apr 2026 01:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Laurence Patrick Cannings ORCID iD
Author: Craig Hutton ORCID iD
Author: Kristine Nilsen ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×