The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Microbiome research in practice: priorities for clinical translation and impact

Microbiome research in practice: priorities for clinical translation and impact
Microbiome research in practice: priorities for clinical translation and impact
Background: rapid advances in microbiome science have sparked clinical and commercial enthusiasm for interventions, yet translation into practice risks outpacing both mechanistic understanding and the infrastructure required for safe adoption.

Objectives: to outline a coordinated research, clinical, social, and policy agenda for advancing safe, effective, and equitable microbiome-based interventions.

Sources: we convened an interdisciplinary Royal Society-funded expert workshop (Leeds, UK, October 2024) with international leaders in microbiome science, clinical trials, regulation, and social science. Thematic analysis of workshop discussions and written contributions identified priority domains for translation.

Content: three intersecting priorities emerged: scientific credibility, practical viability, and stakeholder engagement. Scientific credibility demands investment in multiomic and strain-level characterization of host-microbiome interactions on a large scale, benchmarking of clinical and microbiological endpoints, and harmonization of trial conduct and reporting. Clinical adoption requires fit-for-purpose regulation, diversified investment to address funding bottlenecks, and coordinated capacity building. Meaningful stakeholder engagement with clinicians, patients, policymakers, and the public is essential to foster confidence, develop clinically relevant research questions, and ensure equitable implementation of any new technology.

Implications: to realize the clinical impact of microbiome interventions, sustained collaboration across disciplines is essential. This review offers a translational roadmap and actionable priorities to accelerate safe, effective, and equitable microbiome-based interventions—ensuring the field fulfils its clinical potential and delivers real-world impact.
Clinical trials, Evidence-based practice, Microbiome, Stakeholder participation, Translational
1198-743X
Theodosiou, Anastasia
d0f2d7b5-6664-4b86-b738-25815681829b
Bogaert, Debby
ac4e1a3f-bbdd-4817-9647-bffe41ee3b2e
Cleary, David W.
dd4448b2-91f4-4eb0-ad92-656a7bd3e4f1
Fady, Paul-Enguerrand
81908b8c-5fb7-4de9-b313-88fe4db59b48
Feehily, Conor
828c0066-b073-4f9a-a96b-3e15f10e95fb
Gilbert, Jack A.
4747a231-41f7-405b-98a8-78a2af1863b6
Greenhough, Beth
e0e662f1-c322-4b2f-83e6-5172a75919ae
Guardabassi, Luca
e417f55d-e489-42ed-b0cc-c58cb2f39634
Hall, Lindsay J.
55b94742-b975-4c9d-968f-efb33d931ae3
Harman, Toni
d327997b-aafd-4cbc-a658-4087a6ebcd63
Kuijper, Ed J.
fe82764d-7d3b-44b8-9ac2-c1bb6d2486f6
Lebeer, Sarah
bd7e8644-76cc-480e-b374-39ce7c4e92fa
Lorimer, Jamie
b7d409e4-ab3f-4188-b817-97c07d6673e0
Spector, Tim D.
1e47066c-6620-4f86-af6f-89d9e130ffc2
Jones, Chrissie E.
48229079-8b58-4dcb-8374-d9481fe7b426
Theodosiou, Anastasia
d0f2d7b5-6664-4b86-b738-25815681829b
Bogaert, Debby
ac4e1a3f-bbdd-4817-9647-bffe41ee3b2e
Cleary, David W.
dd4448b2-91f4-4eb0-ad92-656a7bd3e4f1
Fady, Paul-Enguerrand
81908b8c-5fb7-4de9-b313-88fe4db59b48
Feehily, Conor
828c0066-b073-4f9a-a96b-3e15f10e95fb
Gilbert, Jack A.
4747a231-41f7-405b-98a8-78a2af1863b6
Greenhough, Beth
e0e662f1-c322-4b2f-83e6-5172a75919ae
Guardabassi, Luca
e417f55d-e489-42ed-b0cc-c58cb2f39634
Hall, Lindsay J.
55b94742-b975-4c9d-968f-efb33d931ae3
Harman, Toni
d327997b-aafd-4cbc-a658-4087a6ebcd63
Kuijper, Ed J.
fe82764d-7d3b-44b8-9ac2-c1bb6d2486f6
Lebeer, Sarah
bd7e8644-76cc-480e-b374-39ce7c4e92fa
Lorimer, Jamie
b7d409e4-ab3f-4188-b817-97c07d6673e0
Spector, Tim D.
1e47066c-6620-4f86-af6f-89d9e130ffc2
Jones, Chrissie E.
48229079-8b58-4dcb-8374-d9481fe7b426

Theodosiou, Anastasia, Bogaert, Debby, Cleary, David W., Fady, Paul-Enguerrand, Feehily, Conor, Gilbert, Jack A., Greenhough, Beth, Guardabassi, Luca, Hall, Lindsay J., Harman, Toni, Kuijper, Ed J., Lebeer, Sarah, Lorimer, Jamie, Spector, Tim D. and Jones, Chrissie E. (2026) Microbiome research in practice: priorities for clinical translation and impact. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. (doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2026.01.021).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: rapid advances in microbiome science have sparked clinical and commercial enthusiasm for interventions, yet translation into practice risks outpacing both mechanistic understanding and the infrastructure required for safe adoption.

Objectives: to outline a coordinated research, clinical, social, and policy agenda for advancing safe, effective, and equitable microbiome-based interventions.

Sources: we convened an interdisciplinary Royal Society-funded expert workshop (Leeds, UK, October 2024) with international leaders in microbiome science, clinical trials, regulation, and social science. Thematic analysis of workshop discussions and written contributions identified priority domains for translation.

Content: three intersecting priorities emerged: scientific credibility, practical viability, and stakeholder engagement. Scientific credibility demands investment in multiomic and strain-level characterization of host-microbiome interactions on a large scale, benchmarking of clinical and microbiological endpoints, and harmonization of trial conduct and reporting. Clinical adoption requires fit-for-purpose regulation, diversified investment to address funding bottlenecks, and coordinated capacity building. Meaningful stakeholder engagement with clinicians, patients, policymakers, and the public is essential to foster confidence, develop clinically relevant research questions, and ensure equitable implementation of any new technology.

Implications: to realize the clinical impact of microbiome interventions, sustained collaboration across disciplines is essential. This review offers a translational roadmap and actionable priorities to accelerate safe, effective, and equitable microbiome-based interventions—ensuring the field fulfils its clinical potential and delivers real-world impact.

Text
CMI_preproof - Other
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (631kB)
Text
1-s2.0-S1198743X26000261-main - Proof
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (790kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 23 January 2026
e-pub ahead of print date: 31 January 2026
Keywords: Clinical trials, Evidence-based practice, Microbiome, Stakeholder participation, Translational

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 510660
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/510660
ISSN: 1198-743X
PURE UUID: fb752d33-fbe4-4bbd-b3a5-f3a500d83514
ORCID for Anastasia Theodosiou: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0096-4825
ORCID for Chrissie E. Jones: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1523-2368

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Apr 2026 16:48
Last modified: 21 Apr 2026 02:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Anastasia Theodosiou ORCID iD
Author: Debby Bogaert
Author: David W. Cleary
Author: Paul-Enguerrand Fady
Author: Conor Feehily
Author: Jack A. Gilbert
Author: Beth Greenhough
Author: Luca Guardabassi
Author: Lindsay J. Hall
Author: Toni Harman
Author: Ed J. Kuijper
Author: Sarah Lebeer
Author: Jamie Lorimer
Author: Tim D. Spector

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×