The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

3695 Deprescribing medications with anticholinergic burden in older hospitalised adults: a systematic review

3695 Deprescribing medications with anticholinergic burden in older hospitalised adults: a systematic review
3695 Deprescribing medications with anticholinergic burden in older hospitalised adults: a systematic review
Background: use of anticholinergic medication is increasing, especially among the older population due to polypharmacy and co-morbidities. High anticholinergic burden is associated with adverse effects such as reduced mobility and future dementia risk. Acute hospital stay may be an appropriate time to target this commonly overlooked problem.

Aims: to explore the effects of deprescribing medications with anticholinergic burden on health outcomes of hospitalised older people.

Method: Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched for relevant papers from database inception to September 2024. Studies that involved a deprescribing or medication review intervention to reduce anticholinergic burden within a hospital setting in older people (≥65 years old) were included. Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guidelines were used for narrative synthesis and Joanna Briggs Institute Checklists were used for quality assessment.

Results: 2042 papers were identified, and eight papers were included in this review. There was heterogeneity of design and outcomes across the studies with generally short follow-up. Study designs included: cohort (n = 4), pre-post quasi-experimental (n = 3) and audit (n = 1). Outcomes reported included: medication-related outcomes (n = 8), acceptability (n = 4) and clinical outcomes (n = 1). No studies reported on safety or costs. Six studies reported a reduction in anticholinergic burden score following the intervention, two studies demonstrated a significant reduction in the proportion of patients taking anticholinergic medication following intervention. The quality of the studies varied and ranged from poor to moderate.

Conclusion: this review found that deprescribing interventions within a hospital setting may be acceptable and successful in reducing anticholinergic burden in older adults. However, effectiveness of intervention on important clinical outcomes could not be determined due to short follow-ups and limited data on clinical outcomes, costs, and safety. In future, there is a need for randomised controlled trials to focus on clinical outcomes and involve longer durations of follow-up.
0002-0729
Griffiths, R.
182e5e39-a441-4969-9748-4788a810a0ad
Ibrahim, K.
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294
Lim, S.
dd2bfbd7-7f74-4365-b77e-9989f6408ddc
Bates, A.
46ff2189-9345-45bb-bb83-c90971ccccb4
Jones, L.
a40fc749-4bb4-4df2-8cbc-fcb553426fd8
Griffiths, R.
182e5e39-a441-4969-9748-4788a810a0ad
Ibrahim, K.
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294
Lim, S.
dd2bfbd7-7f74-4365-b77e-9989f6408ddc
Bates, A.
46ff2189-9345-45bb-bb83-c90971ccccb4
Jones, L.
a40fc749-4bb4-4df2-8cbc-fcb553426fd8

Griffiths, R., Ibrahim, K., Lim, S., Bates, A. and Jones, L. (2026) 3695 Deprescribing medications with anticholinergic burden in older hospitalised adults: a systematic review. Age and Ageing, 55 (Suppl. 1), [afaf368.134]. (doi:10.1093/ageing/afaf368.134).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Background: use of anticholinergic medication is increasing, especially among the older population due to polypharmacy and co-morbidities. High anticholinergic burden is associated with adverse effects such as reduced mobility and future dementia risk. Acute hospital stay may be an appropriate time to target this commonly overlooked problem.

Aims: to explore the effects of deprescribing medications with anticholinergic burden on health outcomes of hospitalised older people.

Method: Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched for relevant papers from database inception to September 2024. Studies that involved a deprescribing or medication review intervention to reduce anticholinergic burden within a hospital setting in older people (≥65 years old) were included. Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guidelines were used for narrative synthesis and Joanna Briggs Institute Checklists were used for quality assessment.

Results: 2042 papers were identified, and eight papers were included in this review. There was heterogeneity of design and outcomes across the studies with generally short follow-up. Study designs included: cohort (n = 4), pre-post quasi-experimental (n = 3) and audit (n = 1). Outcomes reported included: medication-related outcomes (n = 8), acceptability (n = 4) and clinical outcomes (n = 1). No studies reported on safety or costs. Six studies reported a reduction in anticholinergic burden score following the intervention, two studies demonstrated a significant reduction in the proportion of patients taking anticholinergic medication following intervention. The quality of the studies varied and ranged from poor to moderate.

Conclusion: this review found that deprescribing interventions within a hospital setting may be acceptable and successful in reducing anticholinergic burden in older adults. However, effectiveness of intervention on important clinical outcomes could not be determined due to short follow-ups and limited data on clinical outcomes, costs, and safety. In future, there is a need for randomised controlled trials to focus on clinical outcomes and involve longer durations of follow-up.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 5 February 2026

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 510753
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/510753
ISSN: 0002-0729
PURE UUID: 59b492b1-57b5-4611-927d-e53cbc3c4943
ORCID for K. Ibrahim: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5709-3867
ORCID for S. Lim: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-2362
ORCID for A. Bates: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3614-0270
ORCID for L. Jones: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7323-5255

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Apr 2026 16:39
Last modified: 23 Apr 2026 02:27

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: R. Griffiths
Author: K. Ibrahim ORCID iD
Author: S. Lim ORCID iD
Author: A. Bates ORCID iD
Author: L. Jones ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×