The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

How does inattention influence the robustness and efficiency of adaptive procedures in the context of psychoacoustic assessments via smartphone?

How does inattention influence the robustness and efficiency of adaptive procedures in the context of psychoacoustic assessments via smartphone?
How does inattention influence the robustness and efficiency of adaptive procedures in the context of psychoacoustic assessments via smartphone?
Inattention plays a critical role in the accuracy of threshold measurements, e.g., when using mobile devices. To describe the influence of distraction, long- and short-term inattention models based on either a stationary or a non-stationary psychometric function were developed and used to generate three simulated listeners: fully-, moderately-, and non-concentrated listeners. Six established adaptive procedures were assessed via Monte-Carlo simulations in combination with the inattention models and compared with a newly proposed method: the graded response bracketing procedure (GRaBr). Robustness was examined by bias and root mean square error between the “true” and estimated thresholds while efficiency was evaluated using rates of convergence and a normalized efficiency index. The findings show that inattention has a detrimental impact on adaptive procedure performance—especially for the short-term inattentive listener—and that several model-based procedures relying on a consistent response behavior of the listener are prone to errors owing to inattention. The model-free procedure GRaBr, on the other hand, is considerably robust and efficient in spite of the (assumed) inattention. As a result, adaptive techniques with desired properties (i.e., high robustness and efficiency) as revealed in our simulations—such as GRaBr—appear to be advantageous for mobile devices or in laboratory tests with untrained subjects.
2331-2165
Xu, Chen
73268368-81b7-46b9-b752-5d0392977212
Hülsmeier, David
512e82c1-203e-40e9-9b88-d5fba6ee1ba1
Buhl, Mareike
9d2a91f0-f9fe-4661-a2a0-de0c58bdc823
Kollmeier, Birger
6de18374-5a52-4ca2-8d1f-08b32ca43942
Xu, Chen
73268368-81b7-46b9-b752-5d0392977212
Hülsmeier, David
512e82c1-203e-40e9-9b88-d5fba6ee1ba1
Buhl, Mareike
9d2a91f0-f9fe-4661-a2a0-de0c58bdc823
Kollmeier, Birger
6de18374-5a52-4ca2-8d1f-08b32ca43942

Xu, Chen, Hülsmeier, David, Buhl, Mareike and Kollmeier, Birger (2024) How does inattention influence the robustness and efficiency of adaptive procedures in the context of psychoacoustic assessments via smartphone? Trends in Hearing, 28. (doi:10.1177/23312165241288051).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Inattention plays a critical role in the accuracy of threshold measurements, e.g., when using mobile devices. To describe the influence of distraction, long- and short-term inattention models based on either a stationary or a non-stationary psychometric function were developed and used to generate three simulated listeners: fully-, moderately-, and non-concentrated listeners. Six established adaptive procedures were assessed via Monte-Carlo simulations in combination with the inattention models and compared with a newly proposed method: the graded response bracketing procedure (GRaBr). Robustness was examined by bias and root mean square error between the “true” and estimated thresholds while efficiency was evaluated using rates of convergence and a normalized efficiency index. The findings show that inattention has a detrimental impact on adaptive procedure performance—especially for the short-term inattentive listener—and that several model-based procedures relying on a consistent response behavior of the listener are prone to errors owing to inattention. The model-free procedure GRaBr, on the other hand, is considerably robust and efficient in spite of the (assumed) inattention. As a result, adaptive techniques with desired properties (i.e., high robustness and efficiency) as revealed in our simulations—such as GRaBr—appear to be advantageous for mobile devices or in laboratory tests with untrained subjects.

Text
xu-et-al-2024-how-does-inattention-influence-the-robustness-and-efficiency-of-adaptive-procedures-in-the-context-of - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (3MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 September 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 November 2024
Published date: 18 November 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 510890
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/510890
ISSN: 2331-2165
PURE UUID: 73bdd4ff-d335-4258-8b70-de9c8cfeac7b
ORCID for Chen Xu: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3233-3179

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Apr 2026 16:35
Last modified: 25 Apr 2026 04:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Chen Xu ORCID iD
Author: David Hülsmeier
Author: Mareike Buhl
Author: Birger Kollmeier

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×