The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Health and related behaviours of fly-in fly-out workers in the mining industry in Australia: a cross-sectional study

Health and related behaviours of fly-in fly-out workers in the mining industry in Australia: a cross-sectional study
Health and related behaviours of fly-in fly-out workers in the mining industry in Australia: a cross-sectional study
Background: Fly-In Fly-Out (FIFO), which entails travelling mostly from the urban areas to stay and work in remote areas for designated periods and travel back home to spend designated days of leave, has become a common work arrangement in the mining sector globally. This study examined the mental and physical health of FIFO workers and described their health-related behaviours during on-and off-shift periods.

Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted with FIFO workers (N = 216) in the mining industry in Australia who completed an online survey. Paired t-test and McNemer’s analysis examined the differences in health-related behaviours during workers’ on-and off-shift days. Logistic regression examined the predictors of physical health and psychological distress status of FIFO workers.

Results: workers reported longer sleep duration (7.5 ± 1.5 h vs 6.3 ± 1.2 h, p < 0.001) and better sleep quality (78.2% vs 46.3%, p < 0.001) during off-shift nights than on on-shift nights. Smoking prevalence was 26.4%, and workers reported smoking a similar number of cigarettes per day during on-and off-shift days. Most workers reported drinking alcohol (86.1%) and more often at risky levels during off-shift than on-shift days (57.9% vs 34.3%, p < 0.001). Fruits and vegetable consumption was low but with higher vegetable intake during off-shift days (2.8 ± 1.4 vs 2.3 ± 1.3 serves, p < 0.001). Workers had good physical health status (91.2%), but 71.4% were overweight/obese and 33.4% indicated high levels of psychological distress. Working on long shifts (OR 6.63, 95% CI 1.84–23.91) and smoking (OR 7.17, 95% CI 2.67–19.26) were linked to high psychological distress.

Conclusions: the prevalence of psychological distress and risky health behaviours was high. Interventions should aim to reduce psychological distress and support multiple behaviour changes, considering FIFO work-related characteristics including long shift hours.
0340-0131
105-120
Asare, Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah
c7d96058-74f4-4f2f-a58b-7e62f226f3fa
Robinson, Suzanne
381aa349-a158-4001-86e8-20327d1b300d
Powell, Daniel
e1e53a46-a37b-425b-ac15-e82f99033f46
Kwasnicka, Dominika
967b4afc-0d59-467f-aa76-44cc15011f4c
Asare, Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah
c7d96058-74f4-4f2f-a58b-7e62f226f3fa
Robinson, Suzanne
381aa349-a158-4001-86e8-20327d1b300d
Powell, Daniel
e1e53a46-a37b-425b-ac15-e82f99033f46
Kwasnicka, Dominika
967b4afc-0d59-467f-aa76-44cc15011f4c

Asare, Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah, Robinson, Suzanne, Powell, Daniel and Kwasnicka, Dominika (2023) Health and related behaviours of fly-in fly-out workers in the mining industry in Australia: a cross-sectional study. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 96, 105-120. (doi:10.1007/s00420-022-01908-x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Fly-In Fly-Out (FIFO), which entails travelling mostly from the urban areas to stay and work in remote areas for designated periods and travel back home to spend designated days of leave, has become a common work arrangement in the mining sector globally. This study examined the mental and physical health of FIFO workers and described their health-related behaviours during on-and off-shift periods.

Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted with FIFO workers (N = 216) in the mining industry in Australia who completed an online survey. Paired t-test and McNemer’s analysis examined the differences in health-related behaviours during workers’ on-and off-shift days. Logistic regression examined the predictors of physical health and psychological distress status of FIFO workers.

Results: workers reported longer sleep duration (7.5 ± 1.5 h vs 6.3 ± 1.2 h, p < 0.001) and better sleep quality (78.2% vs 46.3%, p < 0.001) during off-shift nights than on on-shift nights. Smoking prevalence was 26.4%, and workers reported smoking a similar number of cigarettes per day during on-and off-shift days. Most workers reported drinking alcohol (86.1%) and more often at risky levels during off-shift than on-shift days (57.9% vs 34.3%, p < 0.001). Fruits and vegetable consumption was low but with higher vegetable intake during off-shift days (2.8 ± 1.4 vs 2.3 ± 1.3 serves, p < 0.001). Workers had good physical health status (91.2%), but 71.4% were overweight/obese and 33.4% indicated high levels of psychological distress. Working on long shifts (OR 6.63, 95% CI 1.84–23.91) and smoking (OR 7.17, 95% CI 2.67–19.26) were linked to high psychological distress.

Conclusions: the prevalence of psychological distress and risky health behaviours was high. Interventions should aim to reduce psychological distress and support multiple behaviour changes, considering FIFO work-related characteristics including long shift hours.

Text
s00420-022-01908-x - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (926kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 July 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 July 2022
Published date: 1 January 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 510900
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/510900
ISSN: 0340-0131
PURE UUID: 489206f4-d991-4f83-b35e-d3a7904fe792
ORCID for Daniel Powell: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4995-6057

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Apr 2026 16:43
Last modified: 25 Apr 2026 04:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah Asare
Author: Suzanne Robinson
Author: Daniel Powell ORCID iD
Author: Dominika Kwasnicka

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×