The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Measuring change in Psychologist-Led Specialist Interventions (PLSI): the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Multi-Agency Stalking Partnership Measurement Framework

Measuring change in Psychologist-Led Specialist Interventions (PLSI): the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Multi-Agency Stalking Partnership Measurement Framework
Measuring change in Psychologist-Led Specialist Interventions (PLSI): the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Multi-Agency Stalking Partnership Measurement Framework
Background: how change should be defined and measured within psychological interventions for stalking remains poorly specified, despite growing policy and practice interest in perpetrator-focused work. Existing evaluations have relied heavily on criminal justice outcomes, offering limited insight into psychological mechanisms associated with persistence, risk, and desistance.

Aims: this paper describes the outcome measurement framework used within Psychologist-Led Specialist Interventions (PLSI) delivered by the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Multi-Agency Stalking Partnership (MASP), illustrating a pragmatic, clinically grounded approach to assessing change in real-world forensic practice.

Methods: drawing on routine clinical practice, the paper outlines the selection, timing, and application of outcome measures used within MASP PLSI. Measures span psychological distress, experiential avoidance, impulsivity, agency, rumination, social functioning, and everyday functioning, alongside structured professional judgement in stalking risk assessment. The framework combines a core set of measures used across all interventions with additional typology-specific and therapy-specific tools aligned to formulation and intervention targets.

Results: outcome measurement within MASP is embedded within clinical formulation and intervention delivery rather than treated as a standalone evaluative exercise. The framework prioritises feasibility, sensitivity to short-term change, and relevance to distinct stalking typologies, while accommodating longer-term and schema-focused assessment for complex presentations.

Conclusions: the MASP framework provides a transparent account of current practice in a developing field and highlights key priorities for future research, including the development of stalking-specific outcome measures, improved assessment of social and relational functioning, and integration of victim-centred and goal-based outcomes. This work offers a reference point for forensic practitioners and researchers seeking to evaluate psychological change within stalking interventions.
stalking, psychological interventions, outcome measurement, forensic psychology, multi-agency working, risk assessment, behaviour change, measurement framework
Social Science Research Network
Harris, Rebecca Jane
ccccfec7-8a18-4e81-bcfb-34f2b1204aea
Butcher, Kirsty
638311c7-ca07-4aee-9170-d473a4a95373
Porter, Katerina
09240a8a-b802-411c-84b7-022c156144e3
Weir, Lana
4aa72912-3de0-4c42-ba90-07f0cd768ae9
Parkes, Julie
59dc6de3-4018-415e-bb99-13552f97e984
Morgan, Sarah A.
8ad10b7e-2005-4e93-9948-164a69489350
Harris, Rebecca Jane
ccccfec7-8a18-4e81-bcfb-34f2b1204aea
Butcher, Kirsty
638311c7-ca07-4aee-9170-d473a4a95373
Porter, Katerina
09240a8a-b802-411c-84b7-022c156144e3
Weir, Lana
4aa72912-3de0-4c42-ba90-07f0cd768ae9
Parkes, Julie
59dc6de3-4018-415e-bb99-13552f97e984
Morgan, Sarah A.
8ad10b7e-2005-4e93-9948-164a69489350

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

Background: how change should be defined and measured within psychological interventions for stalking remains poorly specified, despite growing policy and practice interest in perpetrator-focused work. Existing evaluations have relied heavily on criminal justice outcomes, offering limited insight into psychological mechanisms associated with persistence, risk, and desistance.

Aims: this paper describes the outcome measurement framework used within Psychologist-Led Specialist Interventions (PLSI) delivered by the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Multi-Agency Stalking Partnership (MASP), illustrating a pragmatic, clinically grounded approach to assessing change in real-world forensic practice.

Methods: drawing on routine clinical practice, the paper outlines the selection, timing, and application of outcome measures used within MASP PLSI. Measures span psychological distress, experiential avoidance, impulsivity, agency, rumination, social functioning, and everyday functioning, alongside structured professional judgement in stalking risk assessment. The framework combines a core set of measures used across all interventions with additional typology-specific and therapy-specific tools aligned to formulation and intervention targets.

Results: outcome measurement within MASP is embedded within clinical formulation and intervention delivery rather than treated as a standalone evaluative exercise. The framework prioritises feasibility, sensitivity to short-term change, and relevance to distinct stalking typologies, while accommodating longer-term and schema-focused assessment for complex presentations.

Conclusions: the MASP framework provides a transparent account of current practice in a developing field and highlights key priorities for future research, including the development of stalking-specific outcome measures, improved assessment of social and relational functioning, and integration of victim-centred and goal-based outcomes. This work offers a reference point for forensic practitioners and researchers seeking to evaluate psychological change within stalking interventions.

Text
ssrn-6478140 - Author's Original
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Measuring Change in PLSI - The HIOW MASP Measurement Framework
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Published Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Submitted date: 27 March 2026
Published date: 3 April 2026
Keywords: stalking, psychological interventions, outcome measurement, forensic psychology, multi-agency working, risk assessment, behaviour change, measurement framework

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 511093
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/511093
PURE UUID: 5a621794-0835-4178-b5ce-aeb14a250009
ORCID for Rebecca Jane Harris: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8537-7282
ORCID for Katerina Porter: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0673-9178
ORCID for Julie Parkes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6490-395X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 May 2026 16:36
Last modified: 02 May 2026 02:16

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Rebecca Jane Harris ORCID iD
Author: Kirsty Butcher
Author: Katerina Porter ORCID iD
Author: Lana Weir
Author: Julie Parkes ORCID iD
Author: Sarah A. Morgan

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×