The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Conversion in minimally invasive liver surgery: the impact of conversion urgency and surgical approach

Conversion in minimally invasive liver surgery: the impact of conversion urgency and surgical approach
Conversion in minimally invasive liver surgery: the impact of conversion urgency and surgical approach

Background: conversion to open surgery forfeits any potential benefits of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS), however, it remains uncertain whether the conversion itself introduces additional risk. The impact may differ depending on urgency (emergency or elective) and surgical approach (robotic or laparoscopic liver resection). This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of emergency and elective conversions in robotic liver resection (RLR) and laparoscopic liver resection (LLR).

Patients and methods: data from 34 international centers of patients undergoing converted MILS procedures (stratified for conversion urgency) were retrospectively compared with patients who underwent elective open liver surgery using propensity score matching. Additionally, RLR and LLR conversions were compared. Conversion risk factors were identified using multivariable logistic regression in RLR and LLR separately.

Results: among 10,548 MILS procedures (n = 1626 RLR and n = 8922 LLR), 719 (6.8%) were converted. Both emergency (n = 226) and elective (n = 472) conversions were associated with longer operative time and more Pringle use compared with open surgery. Emergency conversions additionally showed higher blood loss, transfusion rates, severe morbidity, and even mortality. Matched analysis of 40 pairs of RLR and LLR conversions identified no significant differences in perioperative outcomes, although mortality following RLR conversion was remarkably high (7.7%). RLR conversion risk factors were bilobar disease and anatomically major resection; whereas LLR risk factors included cirrhosis, history of previous liver surgery, tumor size, technically complex, and anatomically major resection.

Conclusions: emergency conversions in MILS are associated with worse outcomes, whereas elective conversions appear safe, highlighting the importance of timely, controlled conversion. Further investigation into the safety of robotic conversions is warranted.

Conversion, Hepatectomy, Laparoscopic liver surgery, Minimally invasive liver surgery, Robotic liver surgery
1068-9265
Pilz da Cunha, Gabriela
bc1bdee7-2204-45f7-8e37-bd07f00cf81a
Aghayan, Davit
2d7a4b1a-57d9-4344-8a1a-40ab85d85276
Cipriani, Federica
aca25573-d300-425d-ba9c-20be3190ce2e
Chua, Darren W
2c6832ee-d758-4d20-b8fc-719cedcf5952
Morrison-Jones, Victoria
42607321-18d8-4e4f-b66f-7ab3f54697b7
Lanari, Jacopo
ac1a25d8-50ec-494c-a14e-47fe751da1a3
de Meyere, Celine
549a67ce-5710-4589-b434-60dae9f55e0c
Wei, Kongyuan
2eac1e56-77dd-4e16-b461-af11f82f57bc
Tzedakis, Stylianos
f2ada53d-eed4-4710-8f03-bd3e40d0afff
Martinie, John
a17395eb-5815-426b-b822-822e5b53d7a8
Bordom, Daniel Osei
01b0418e-efcd-4492-b0c3-c91706ab5aa2
Adel, Soufyan El
49c7c535-bfb5-4745-b084-7171fb6c1b04
Crespo, Kaitlyn
de181af6-e3e9-4ec1-9017-5c1211ebbce0
Magistri, Paolo
1d26bbd1-bdb8-4d3c-ae1b-80c3a26ab4f7
Russolillo, Nadia
a793d6f6-8078-49a2-bbc5-6f101c58c4e1
Conci, Simone
f821556e-0033-4565-8bbe-9cbd2532dea4
Cacciaguerra, Andrea Benedetti
42ca93f3-8bc6-4814-84a4-89f48dd8a37d
D'Souza, Daniel
33ca8f64-6ec3-4964-a016-a56d3bbe83d4
Zozaya, Gabriel
03afd1a9-3bea-4fee-b5c0-5410bc12f71c
Caula, Cèlia
3ab68b31-bbac-4c9a-99be-392e6b68b96a
Rehman, Shafiq
30737a4d-ab88-4adb-b2f0-29a607e29c71
Fretland, Åsmund Avdem
ff7e5358-eb08-4676-a362-f525581b062b
Koh, Ye-Xin
29b7b60a-ade8-4b12-ace6-4061dec75e6a
Besselinkz, Marc G
9ea16d2a-8590-48f7-9f33-0135f9d9a26f
van Dieren, Susan
c77ef5f4-2729-4f65-830a-0440fa2a36c2
Geller, David
cc65b253-8f5f-4b1a-a331-a4da4d9140ce
Campos, Ricardo Robles
86ee4ea5-09cd-49a9-899b-20cfccff227b
Croner, Roland S.
e6046648-db30-4a1f-a8bf-023d9491bc8c
Jovine, Elio
0f89902b-8f3a-4abb-9ae8-87d23fcb3685
Efanov, Mikhail
ceefe17f-20c9-4add-837c-0d9a3edca254
Alseidi, Adnan
56ccae5a-69f6-424b-8921-0f73bfff0d60
Memeo, Riccardo
0ba63c49-be11-4a1b-bed0-f0b5359098d4
Dagher, Ibrahim
312c6f59-9764-45d0-a050-cb27a3100f23
Giuliante, Felice
8873f642-ce98-4565-b89a-2008a90b442d
Sparrelid, Ernesto
a17169b0-3a27-4c12-8d16-f78a10bc139f
Ahmad, Jawad
2378fd75-73a9-4589-b88c-1bcbd91d24a5
Gallagher, Tom
202fbf33-3535-4d30-b1ac-f97732581ae2
Schmelzle, Moritz
5b72cf4c-ebb5-4883-b301-1d257fb4c39b
White, Steven
Ben, Santi Lopez
6c328095-41c7-4e90-915f-db1f25a3364f
Rotellar, Fernando
a7de9d5e-65f1-49fa-99e9-d8ba1e46bd55
Serrano, Pablo E.
9414c837-a77a-44f2-99a2-db9d268f3f55
Vivarelli, Marco
2882acf3-3bbd-4c3c-979b-2dd6abc27850
Ruzzenente, Andrea
26cd4f69-4e59-486b-885b-f57c88ab5dcf
Ferrero, Alessandro
0cb0b38c-30c5-44f9-996c-27e9ef37b62f
Di Benedetto, Fabrizio
89fd04f9-961e-4ead-8290-a157a5d1fbe8
Sucandy, Iswanto
c76f8e25-32c1-401b-9277-1534b10f3d4a
Sutcliffe, Robert P
53a0327d-e30f-4bf9-a284-986a82268276
Primrose, John N.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
International Consortium on Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (IMILS)
Pilz da Cunha, Gabriela
bc1bdee7-2204-45f7-8e37-bd07f00cf81a
Aghayan, Davit
2d7a4b1a-57d9-4344-8a1a-40ab85d85276
Cipriani, Federica
aca25573-d300-425d-ba9c-20be3190ce2e
Chua, Darren W
2c6832ee-d758-4d20-b8fc-719cedcf5952
Morrison-Jones, Victoria
42607321-18d8-4e4f-b66f-7ab3f54697b7
Lanari, Jacopo
ac1a25d8-50ec-494c-a14e-47fe751da1a3
de Meyere, Celine
549a67ce-5710-4589-b434-60dae9f55e0c
Wei, Kongyuan
2eac1e56-77dd-4e16-b461-af11f82f57bc
Tzedakis, Stylianos
f2ada53d-eed4-4710-8f03-bd3e40d0afff
Martinie, John
a17395eb-5815-426b-b822-822e5b53d7a8
Bordom, Daniel Osei
01b0418e-efcd-4492-b0c3-c91706ab5aa2
Adel, Soufyan El
49c7c535-bfb5-4745-b084-7171fb6c1b04
Crespo, Kaitlyn
de181af6-e3e9-4ec1-9017-5c1211ebbce0
Magistri, Paolo
1d26bbd1-bdb8-4d3c-ae1b-80c3a26ab4f7
Russolillo, Nadia
a793d6f6-8078-49a2-bbc5-6f101c58c4e1
Conci, Simone
f821556e-0033-4565-8bbe-9cbd2532dea4
Cacciaguerra, Andrea Benedetti
42ca93f3-8bc6-4814-84a4-89f48dd8a37d
D'Souza, Daniel
33ca8f64-6ec3-4964-a016-a56d3bbe83d4
Zozaya, Gabriel
03afd1a9-3bea-4fee-b5c0-5410bc12f71c
Caula, Cèlia
3ab68b31-bbac-4c9a-99be-392e6b68b96a
Rehman, Shafiq
30737a4d-ab88-4adb-b2f0-29a607e29c71
Fretland, Åsmund Avdem
ff7e5358-eb08-4676-a362-f525581b062b
Koh, Ye-Xin
29b7b60a-ade8-4b12-ace6-4061dec75e6a
Besselinkz, Marc G
9ea16d2a-8590-48f7-9f33-0135f9d9a26f
van Dieren, Susan
c77ef5f4-2729-4f65-830a-0440fa2a36c2
Geller, David
cc65b253-8f5f-4b1a-a331-a4da4d9140ce
Campos, Ricardo Robles
86ee4ea5-09cd-49a9-899b-20cfccff227b
Croner, Roland S.
e6046648-db30-4a1f-a8bf-023d9491bc8c
Jovine, Elio
0f89902b-8f3a-4abb-9ae8-87d23fcb3685
Efanov, Mikhail
ceefe17f-20c9-4add-837c-0d9a3edca254
Alseidi, Adnan
56ccae5a-69f6-424b-8921-0f73bfff0d60
Memeo, Riccardo
0ba63c49-be11-4a1b-bed0-f0b5359098d4
Dagher, Ibrahim
312c6f59-9764-45d0-a050-cb27a3100f23
Giuliante, Felice
8873f642-ce98-4565-b89a-2008a90b442d
Sparrelid, Ernesto
a17169b0-3a27-4c12-8d16-f78a10bc139f
Ahmad, Jawad
2378fd75-73a9-4589-b88c-1bcbd91d24a5
Gallagher, Tom
202fbf33-3535-4d30-b1ac-f97732581ae2
Schmelzle, Moritz
5b72cf4c-ebb5-4883-b301-1d257fb4c39b
White, Steven
Ben, Santi Lopez
6c328095-41c7-4e90-915f-db1f25a3364f
Rotellar, Fernando
a7de9d5e-65f1-49fa-99e9-d8ba1e46bd55
Serrano, Pablo E.
9414c837-a77a-44f2-99a2-db9d268f3f55
Vivarelli, Marco
2882acf3-3bbd-4c3c-979b-2dd6abc27850
Ruzzenente, Andrea
26cd4f69-4e59-486b-885b-f57c88ab5dcf
Ferrero, Alessandro
0cb0b38c-30c5-44f9-996c-27e9ef37b62f
Di Benedetto, Fabrizio
89fd04f9-961e-4ead-8290-a157a5d1fbe8
Sucandy, Iswanto
c76f8e25-32c1-401b-9277-1534b10f3d4a
Sutcliffe, Robert P
53a0327d-e30f-4bf9-a284-986a82268276
Primrose, John N.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Abu Hilal, Mohammad

Pilz da Cunha, Gabriela, Aghayan, Davit and Cipriani, Federica , International Consortium on Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (IMILS) (2026) Conversion in minimally invasive liver surgery: the impact of conversion urgency and surgical approach. Annals of surgical oncology. (doi:10.1245/s10434-026-19124-z).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: conversion to open surgery forfeits any potential benefits of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS), however, it remains uncertain whether the conversion itself introduces additional risk. The impact may differ depending on urgency (emergency or elective) and surgical approach (robotic or laparoscopic liver resection). This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of emergency and elective conversions in robotic liver resection (RLR) and laparoscopic liver resection (LLR).

Patients and methods: data from 34 international centers of patients undergoing converted MILS procedures (stratified for conversion urgency) were retrospectively compared with patients who underwent elective open liver surgery using propensity score matching. Additionally, RLR and LLR conversions were compared. Conversion risk factors were identified using multivariable logistic regression in RLR and LLR separately.

Results: among 10,548 MILS procedures (n = 1626 RLR and n = 8922 LLR), 719 (6.8%) were converted. Both emergency (n = 226) and elective (n = 472) conversions were associated with longer operative time and more Pringle use compared with open surgery. Emergency conversions additionally showed higher blood loss, transfusion rates, severe morbidity, and even mortality. Matched analysis of 40 pairs of RLR and LLR conversions identified no significant differences in perioperative outcomes, although mortality following RLR conversion was remarkably high (7.7%). RLR conversion risk factors were bilobar disease and anatomically major resection; whereas LLR risk factors included cirrhosis, history of previous liver surgery, tumor size, technically complex, and anatomically major resection.

Conclusions: emergency conversions in MILS are associated with worse outcomes, whereas elective conversions appear safe, highlighting the importance of timely, controlled conversion. Further investigation into the safety of robotic conversions is warranted.

Text
Manuscript IMILS Conversions - Pilz da Cunha et al. 250724 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 16 March 2027.
Available under License Other.
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 8 January 2026
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 March 2026
Published date: 16 March 2026
Keywords: Conversion, Hepatectomy, Laparoscopic liver surgery, Minimally invasive liver surgery, Robotic liver surgery

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 511266
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/511266
ISSN: 1068-9265
PURE UUID: 3b74c889-475f-4acc-9c40-f372cf1646a1
ORCID for John N. Primrose: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-7605

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 May 2026 16:36
Last modified: 12 May 2026 01:35

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gabriela Pilz da Cunha
Author: Davit Aghayan
Author: Federica Cipriani
Author: Darren W Chua
Author: Victoria Morrison-Jones
Author: Jacopo Lanari
Author: Celine de Meyere
Author: Kongyuan Wei
Author: Stylianos Tzedakis
Author: John Martinie
Author: Daniel Osei Bordom
Author: Soufyan El Adel
Author: Kaitlyn Crespo
Author: Paolo Magistri
Author: Nadia Russolillo
Author: Simone Conci
Author: Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
Author: Daniel D'Souza
Author: Gabriel Zozaya
Author: Cèlia Caula
Author: Shafiq Rehman
Author: Åsmund Avdem Fretland
Author: Ye-Xin Koh
Author: Marc G Besselinkz
Author: Susan van Dieren
Author: David Geller
Author: Ricardo Robles Campos
Author: Roland S. Croner
Author: Elio Jovine
Author: Mikhail Efanov
Author: Adnan Alseidi
Author: Riccardo Memeo
Author: Ibrahim Dagher
Author: Felice Giuliante
Author: Ernesto Sparrelid
Author: Jawad Ahmad
Author: Tom Gallagher
Author: Moritz Schmelzle
Author: Steven White
Author: Santi Lopez Ben
Author: Fernando Rotellar
Author: Pablo E. Serrano
Author: Marco Vivarelli
Author: Andrea Ruzzenente
Author: Alessandro Ferrero
Author: Fabrizio Di Benedetto
Author: Iswanto Sucandy
Author: Robert P Sutcliffe
Author: Mohammad Abu Hilal
Corporate Author: International Consortium on Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (IMILS)

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×