The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Implementing a medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people living with frailty and polypharmacy in general practice: a feasibility study

Implementing a medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people living with frailty and polypharmacy in general practice: a feasibility study
Implementing a medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people living with frailty and polypharmacy in general practice: a feasibility study

Background: polypharmacy in older adults with frailty increases risks of adverse outcomes. Evidence supports proactive structured medication reviews (SMRs) for medicines optimisation, including deprescribing, however challenges exist in general practice.

Aim: to test the implementation of a co-designed multidisciplinary SMR intervention (MODIFY) for this high-risk group.

Design & setting: a non-randomised pre-post feasibility study was conducted across five general practices in England. The multidisciplinary intervention comprised five components including patient and health care professional (HCP) preparation.

Method: patients aged ≥75 with moderate-to-severe frailty (eFI >0.25) and ≥5 medications were identified and invited to participate.

Primary outcomes were recruitment, retention, and completion of outcome measures. Secondary outcomes included medication-related outcomes, healthcare utilisation, adverse drug reactions, and acceptability to patients and HCPs based on qualitative interviews.

Results: of 479 patients invited, 48 were recruited (10% rate); 47 received the intervention, 43 completed three-month follow-up (92% retention). Medication changes occurred in 87% of participants; 72% had at least one medication stopped and 26% had a dose reduced. The mean number of medications decreased slightly by 0.27 (SD:1.44) without significant change in clinical and patient-reported outcomes (including function, frailty status, treatment burden) and no reported adverse events. Qualitative interviews with 10 patients, 1 carer, and 8 HCPs, indicated high acceptability and perceived value, and suggested improvements.Economic data was well completed. SMRs cost £28.50 per patient. Participants' reported quality of life improved slightly over three months.

Conclusion: the MODIFY intervention is feasible and acceptable for deprescribing in primary and support progression to a definitive trial.

2398-3795
Radcliffe, Eloise
4bbec31f-dadd-4b7d-95c4-7d96a5ec8659
Kandala, Ngianga
07a8c745-6e54-4496-8e8e-bbc74d990886
Sach, Tracey
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
McCloskey, Sara
cae8a52b-c6bb-4375-bebf-45001da0498c
Howard, Clare
94f43321-9c1e-4614-8165-cdc7ea5d1f9d
Sheikh, Claire
eab31d73-d098-4dce-9d0c-3254f3db277c
Bradbury, Katherine
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Latter, Sue
83f100a4-95ec-4f2e-99a5-186095de2f3b
Recio Saucedo, Alejandra
d05c4e43-3399-466d-99e0-01403a04b467
Lown, Mark
4742d5f8-bcf3-4e0b-811c-920e7d010c9b
Brad, Lawrence
ea3efe02-d916-4493-b93c-57819db4fc28
Fraser, Simon D.S.
135884b6-8737-4e8a-a98c-5d803ac7a2dc
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294
Radcliffe, Eloise
4bbec31f-dadd-4b7d-95c4-7d96a5ec8659
Kandala, Ngianga
07a8c745-6e54-4496-8e8e-bbc74d990886
Sach, Tracey
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
McCloskey, Sara
cae8a52b-c6bb-4375-bebf-45001da0498c
Howard, Clare
94f43321-9c1e-4614-8165-cdc7ea5d1f9d
Sheikh, Claire
eab31d73-d098-4dce-9d0c-3254f3db277c
Bradbury, Katherine
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Latter, Sue
83f100a4-95ec-4f2e-99a5-186095de2f3b
Recio Saucedo, Alejandra
d05c4e43-3399-466d-99e0-01403a04b467
Lown, Mark
4742d5f8-bcf3-4e0b-811c-920e7d010c9b
Brad, Lawrence
ea3efe02-d916-4493-b93c-57819db4fc28
Fraser, Simon D.S.
135884b6-8737-4e8a-a98c-5d803ac7a2dc
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294

Radcliffe, Eloise, Kandala, Ngianga, Sach, Tracey, McCloskey, Sara, Howard, Clare, Sheikh, Claire, Bradbury, Katherine, Latter, Sue, Recio Saucedo, Alejandra, Lown, Mark, Brad, Lawrence, Fraser, Simon D.S. and Ibrahim, Kinda (2026) Implementing a medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people living with frailty and polypharmacy in general practice: a feasibility study. BJGP Open. (doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0175).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: polypharmacy in older adults with frailty increases risks of adverse outcomes. Evidence supports proactive structured medication reviews (SMRs) for medicines optimisation, including deprescribing, however challenges exist in general practice.

Aim: to test the implementation of a co-designed multidisciplinary SMR intervention (MODIFY) for this high-risk group.

Design & setting: a non-randomised pre-post feasibility study was conducted across five general practices in England. The multidisciplinary intervention comprised five components including patient and health care professional (HCP) preparation.

Method: patients aged ≥75 with moderate-to-severe frailty (eFI >0.25) and ≥5 medications were identified and invited to participate.

Primary outcomes were recruitment, retention, and completion of outcome measures. Secondary outcomes included medication-related outcomes, healthcare utilisation, adverse drug reactions, and acceptability to patients and HCPs based on qualitative interviews.

Results: of 479 patients invited, 48 were recruited (10% rate); 47 received the intervention, 43 completed three-month follow-up (92% retention). Medication changes occurred in 87% of participants; 72% had at least one medication stopped and 26% had a dose reduced. The mean number of medications decreased slightly by 0.27 (SD:1.44) without significant change in clinical and patient-reported outcomes (including function, frailty status, treatment burden) and no reported adverse events. Qualitative interviews with 10 patients, 1 carer, and 8 HCPs, indicated high acceptability and perceived value, and suggested improvements.Economic data was well completed. SMRs cost £28.50 per patient. Participants' reported quality of life improved slightly over three months.

Conclusion: the MODIFY intervention is feasible and acceptable for deprescribing in primary and support progression to a definitive trial.

Text
BJGPO.2025.0175.1.full - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (627kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 February 2026
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 March 2026

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 511283
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/511283
ISSN: 2398-3795
PURE UUID: 7a3a564b-4241-4924-b0ab-b4339ff65078
ORCID for Ngianga Kandala: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6251-8062
ORCID for Tracey Sach: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-9220
ORCID for Sara McCloskey: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0001-3915-9890
ORCID for Katherine Bradbury: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5513-7571
ORCID for Sue Latter: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0973-0512
ORCID for Alejandra Recio Saucedo: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2823-4573
ORCID for Mark Lown: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8309-568X
ORCID for Simon D.S. Fraser: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4172-4406
ORCID for Kinda Ibrahim: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5709-3867

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 May 2026 16:44
Last modified: 16 May 2026 02:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ngianga Kandala ORCID iD
Author: Tracey Sach ORCID iD
Author: Sara McCloskey ORCID iD
Author: Clare Howard
Author: Claire Sheikh
Author: Sue Latter ORCID iD
Author: Mark Lown ORCID iD
Author: Lawrence Brad
Author: Kinda Ibrahim ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×