The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Rapid Respiratory Microbiological Point-of-Care Testing and Antibiotic Use in Primary Care l: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Rapid Respiratory Microbiological Point-of-Care Testing and Antibiotic Use in Primary Care l: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Rapid Respiratory Microbiological Point-of-Care Testing and Antibiotic Use in Primary Care l: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Importance: most antibiotic prescribing takes place in primary care, driving antimicrobial resistance, a top-10 threat to global public health. There is considerable international interest in whether rapid multiplex microbiological point-of-care testing (RM-POCT) can safely reduce antibiotic prescribing in primary care.

Objective: to investigate whether the use of a RM-POCT can safely reduce same-day antibiotic prescribing for children and adults presenting to primary care with respiratory infections.

Design, setting and participants: this parallel-group randomized clinical trial was conducted at 16 general practices in Southwest England between December 2022 and April 2024. Patients were eligible if they were aged 12 months or older, presented with any clinician-diagnosed acute (≤21 days) respiratory tract infection, and the patient or clinician believed antibiotic treatment was, or might be, necessary. Participants were randomized (1:1) to RM-POCT or usual care. The research team, including those conducting statistical analyses, were unaware of group allocation. Data were analyzed from November 21, 2024, to March 13, 2025.

Intervention: patients in the intervention group were tested with RM-POCT to indicate the presence or absence of 19 respiratory viral pathogens and 4 atypical bacteria in approximately 45 minutes.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was same-day antibiotic prescribing. The safety outcome was patient-reported symptom severity on days 2 to 4.

RESULTS Among 552 included patients (mean [SD] age, 40.0 [21.2] years; 349 [63%] female), 276 were randomized to the intervention group and 276 to usual care. Primary outcome data were available for all participants, and safety outcome data were available in 216 intervention participants (78%) and 203 usual care participants (74%). Same-day antibiotics were prescribed to 124 participants (45%) in each group (odds ratio [OR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.41]; P > .99). Prespecified subgroup analyses showed evidence of differentially reduced antibiotic prescribing in participants from whom a virus was detected (OR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.63]; P for interaction < .001) and those with chronic lung disease (OR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.28 to 1.09]; P for interaction = .046) but not children younger than 16 years (OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 0.64 to 4.74]; P for interaction = .24), nor where patients and clinicians disagreed on antibiotic necessity (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.63 to 1.98]; P for interaction = .53). There was no difference in symptom severity on days 2 to 4 between groups (difference in means, 0.09 [95% CI, −0.10 to 0.27]; P = .36).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial among patients with respiratory tract infections being considered for antibiotic treatment in primary care, use of an RM-POCT did not reduce same-day antibiotic prescribing or worsen patient outcomes.

Trial Registration isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16039192.
2168-6106
Hay, Alastair
daf3c71f-5e5a-4bee-9bb8-7df67ec2a79f
Abbs, Samantha Elizabeth
00650d36-e554-4e10-b955-5dbbcc861eba
Ridd, Matthew J.
69f0ca18-18c5-4698-a568-95962058c7d3
Granier, Stephen
dc15b6bc-5a24-47c1-bdbc-ac46f4d5872c
Lane, J. Athene
6683aef1-075d-471f-9c9f-b561a2a3902e
Muir, Peter
60ee4901-6b63-4744-a4b5-54eb38519121
Taylor, Jodi
875cc40a-d428-4a7d-9ee0-710051549a88
Young, Grace J.
34e6c6a3-80ca-4a55-b0c8-1b3f51093f21
Eastwood, Kathy
bebb88a0-9790-41e3-8364-e9662429751f
Dash, Hayley
20a3a42c-fc27-426e-a0c8-0fd9a9934376
Bradshaw, Lynne
6bc3dd14-8ae1-4d49-92d4-81b8a6d8b7d3
Clarke, Rebecca
1cd81684-907a-4bef-8a1c-2566c2d07100
Lui, Mandy
94f324c2-2278-43f3-9443-e71bafd22e3e
Bridgeman, Emma
f91af8bc-4339-4230-abae-e44cb4f8f60e
Brierley, Rachel C.
fea91a57-dd3c-47db-873d-3fb319f14c2b
Brown, Emily
50befb23-eb32-446b-a5f9-2425c4cb5273
Thornton, Hannah
fa5337a1-502a-4904-a8b4-2f0687c8634e
Mitchell, Paul
bfea7dec-d8f1-40de-8703-d933d6f83799
Zhu, Liang
59081265-f24c-44d7-903f-10246e4c7882
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Metcalfe, Chris
516c7009-41ad-4913-b7cd-5f9dffe792b1
Hay, Alastair
daf3c71f-5e5a-4bee-9bb8-7df67ec2a79f
Abbs, Samantha Elizabeth
00650d36-e554-4e10-b955-5dbbcc861eba
Ridd, Matthew J.
69f0ca18-18c5-4698-a568-95962058c7d3
Granier, Stephen
dc15b6bc-5a24-47c1-bdbc-ac46f4d5872c
Lane, J. Athene
6683aef1-075d-471f-9c9f-b561a2a3902e
Muir, Peter
60ee4901-6b63-4744-a4b5-54eb38519121
Taylor, Jodi
875cc40a-d428-4a7d-9ee0-710051549a88
Young, Grace J.
34e6c6a3-80ca-4a55-b0c8-1b3f51093f21
Eastwood, Kathy
bebb88a0-9790-41e3-8364-e9662429751f
Dash, Hayley
20a3a42c-fc27-426e-a0c8-0fd9a9934376
Bradshaw, Lynne
6bc3dd14-8ae1-4d49-92d4-81b8a6d8b7d3
Clarke, Rebecca
1cd81684-907a-4bef-8a1c-2566c2d07100
Lui, Mandy
94f324c2-2278-43f3-9443-e71bafd22e3e
Bridgeman, Emma
f91af8bc-4339-4230-abae-e44cb4f8f60e
Brierley, Rachel C.
fea91a57-dd3c-47db-873d-3fb319f14c2b
Brown, Emily
50befb23-eb32-446b-a5f9-2425c4cb5273
Thornton, Hannah
fa5337a1-502a-4904-a8b4-2f0687c8634e
Mitchell, Paul
bfea7dec-d8f1-40de-8703-d933d6f83799
Zhu, Liang
59081265-f24c-44d7-903f-10246e4c7882
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Metcalfe, Chris
516c7009-41ad-4913-b7cd-5f9dffe792b1

Hay, Alastair, Abbs, Samantha Elizabeth, Ridd, Matthew J., Granier, Stephen, Lane, J. Athene, Muir, Peter, Taylor, Jodi, Young, Grace J., Eastwood, Kathy, Dash, Hayley, Bradshaw, Lynne, Clarke, Rebecca, Lui, Mandy, Bridgeman, Emma, Brierley, Rachel C., Brown, Emily, Thornton, Hannah, Mitchell, Paul, Zhu, Liang, Yardley, Lucy and Metcalfe, Chris (2026) Rapid Respiratory Microbiological Point-of-Care Testing and Antibiotic Use in Primary Care l: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Internal Medicine. (doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.1426).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Importance: most antibiotic prescribing takes place in primary care, driving antimicrobial resistance, a top-10 threat to global public health. There is considerable international interest in whether rapid multiplex microbiological point-of-care testing (RM-POCT) can safely reduce antibiotic prescribing in primary care.

Objective: to investigate whether the use of a RM-POCT can safely reduce same-day antibiotic prescribing for children and adults presenting to primary care with respiratory infections.

Design, setting and participants: this parallel-group randomized clinical trial was conducted at 16 general practices in Southwest England between December 2022 and April 2024. Patients were eligible if they were aged 12 months or older, presented with any clinician-diagnosed acute (≤21 days) respiratory tract infection, and the patient or clinician believed antibiotic treatment was, or might be, necessary. Participants were randomized (1:1) to RM-POCT or usual care. The research team, including those conducting statistical analyses, were unaware of group allocation. Data were analyzed from November 21, 2024, to March 13, 2025.

Intervention: patients in the intervention group were tested with RM-POCT to indicate the presence or absence of 19 respiratory viral pathogens and 4 atypical bacteria in approximately 45 minutes.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was same-day antibiotic prescribing. The safety outcome was patient-reported symptom severity on days 2 to 4.

RESULTS Among 552 included patients (mean [SD] age, 40.0 [21.2] years; 349 [63%] female), 276 were randomized to the intervention group and 276 to usual care. Primary outcome data were available for all participants, and safety outcome data were available in 216 intervention participants (78%) and 203 usual care participants (74%). Same-day antibiotics were prescribed to 124 participants (45%) in each group (odds ratio [OR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.41]; P > .99). Prespecified subgroup analyses showed evidence of differentially reduced antibiotic prescribing in participants from whom a virus was detected (OR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.63]; P for interaction < .001) and those with chronic lung disease (OR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.28 to 1.09]; P for interaction = .046) but not children younger than 16 years (OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 0.64 to 4.74]; P for interaction = .24), nor where patients and clinicians disagreed on antibiotic necessity (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.63 to 1.98]; P for interaction = .53). There was no difference in symptom severity on days 2 to 4 between groups (difference in means, 0.09 [95% CI, −0.10 to 0.27]; P = .36).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial among patients with respiratory tract infections being considered for antibiotic treatment in primary care, use of an RM-POCT did not reduce same-day antibiotic prescribing or worsen patient outcomes.

Trial Registration isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16039192.

Text
jamainternal_hay_2026_oi_260022_1777476624.50529 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (431kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 23 February 2026
Published date: 18 May 2026

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 511538
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/511538
ISSN: 2168-6106
PURE UUID: 53d1c267-bad4-485b-ad3b-231391361036
ORCID for Lucy Yardley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-883X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 May 2026 16:31
Last modified: 23 May 2026 01:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alastair Hay
Author: Samantha Elizabeth Abbs
Author: Matthew J. Ridd
Author: Stephen Granier
Author: J. Athene Lane
Author: Peter Muir
Author: Jodi Taylor
Author: Grace J. Young
Author: Kathy Eastwood
Author: Hayley Dash
Author: Lynne Bradshaw
Author: Rebecca Clarke
Author: Mandy Lui
Author: Emma Bridgeman
Author: Rachel C. Brierley
Author: Emily Brown
Author: Hannah Thornton
Author: Paul Mitchell
Author: Liang Zhu
Author: Lucy Yardley ORCID iD
Author: Chris Metcalfe

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×