The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Experiences of family caregivers caring for cancer patients at home: a qualitative systematic review comparing evidence from HICs and LMICs

Experiences of family caregivers caring for cancer patients at home: a qualitative systematic review comparing evidence from HICs and LMICs
Experiences of family caregivers caring for cancer patients at home: a qualitative systematic review comparing evidence from HICs and LMICs
The rising global cancer incidence and mortality rates increase burden for family caregivers of patients at home.
Much research reflects Western-centric views, overlooking cultural, relational, and structural contexts world wide. We compared experiences of family caregivers in high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) through a qualitative systematic review using JBI methodology. We searched eight databases and screened articles for eligibility. We grouped article findings by HIC and LMIC and used the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping as a flexible heuristic to generate synthesized findings. Of 1067 records identified, 52 studies were included (41 HICs and 11 LMICs). Family caregivers faced high physical and psychosocial demands, inadequately addressed by healthcare and social services. The availability of resources like
home-based services and financial protection differed between HICs and LMICs, but coping strategies were similar. Motivations for caring ranged from moral obligation to caregiving as an extension of relationships.
Caregiving was characterized by emotional distress alongside meaning and satisfaction. Our findings show shared human responses to caregiving, despite differing healthcare access. The comparative insights underscore that caregivers, despite varying contexts are insufficiently acknowledged as vital care team members, compelling urgent health system integration into cancer care plans.
Cancer, Family caregiver, Informal caregiver, Palliative care, Supportive care
2667-3215
2667-3215
Blanchard, Charmaine L.
6bb60456-5db4-4990-b035-ddcd5135c9ca
Mmoledi, Keletso
a085468d-959b-4f02-b78a-d96bb4aaa372
Joffe, Maureen
3ed05269-5b6b-4f1c-a46a-df4f249280bc
Norris, Shane A.
1d346f1b-6d5f-4bca-ac87-7589851b75a4
McInerney, Patricia
51e27636-551f-4efa-bcff-ccdb205f21df
Blanchard, Charmaine L.
6bb60456-5db4-4990-b035-ddcd5135c9ca
Mmoledi, Keletso
a085468d-959b-4f02-b78a-d96bb4aaa372
Joffe, Maureen
3ed05269-5b6b-4f1c-a46a-df4f249280bc
Norris, Shane A.
1d346f1b-6d5f-4bca-ac87-7589851b75a4
McInerney, Patricia
51e27636-551f-4efa-bcff-ccdb205f21df

Blanchard, Charmaine L., Mmoledi, Keletso, Joffe, Maureen, Norris, Shane A. and McInerney, Patricia (2026) Experiences of family caregivers caring for cancer patients at home: a qualitative systematic review comparing evidence from HICs and LMICs. Qualitative Research in Health, 9, 2667-3215, [100773]. (doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2026.100773).

Record type: Review

Abstract

The rising global cancer incidence and mortality rates increase burden for family caregivers of patients at home.
Much research reflects Western-centric views, overlooking cultural, relational, and structural contexts world wide. We compared experiences of family caregivers in high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) through a qualitative systematic review using JBI methodology. We searched eight databases and screened articles for eligibility. We grouped article findings by HIC and LMIC and used the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping as a flexible heuristic to generate synthesized findings. Of 1067 records identified, 52 studies were included (41 HICs and 11 LMICs). Family caregivers faced high physical and psychosocial demands, inadequately addressed by healthcare and social services. The availability of resources like
home-based services and financial protection differed between HICs and LMICs, but coping strategies were similar. Motivations for caring ranged from moral obligation to caregiving as an extension of relationships.
Caregiving was characterized by emotional distress alongside meaning and satisfaction. Our findings show shared human responses to caregiving, despite differing healthcare access. The comparative insights underscore that caregivers, despite varying contexts are insufficiently acknowledged as vital care team members, compelling urgent health system integration into cancer care plans.

Text
Caregiver review published SSM Qual Research June 2026 - Version of Record
Download (2MB)

More information

Submitted date: 5 August 2025
Accepted/In Press date: 20 April 2026
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 April 2026
Published date: June 2026
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2026
Keywords: Cancer, Family caregiver, Informal caregiver, Palliative care, Supportive care

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 511808
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/511808
ISSN: 2667-3215
PURE UUID: a77445de-9050-43fc-9e5e-afacaab88b04
ORCID for Shane A. Norris: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7124-3788

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Jun 2026 16:46
Last modified: 04 Jun 2026 02:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Charmaine L. Blanchard
Author: Keletso Mmoledi
Author: Maureen Joffe
Author: Shane A. Norris ORCID iD
Author: Patricia McInerney

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×