Age differences in the relationship between interoception and emotional processing
Age differences in the relationship between interoception and emotional processing
Understanding how bodily signals shape emotional cognition across adulthood is critical for explaining age-related changes in emotional learning and memory. This study investigated age-related differences in interoceptive sensitivity and emotional associative memory. Interoceptive sensitivity was used as an umbrella term to refer to sensitivity to internal bodily signals across interoceptive accuracy, attention, beliefs, and insight, while emotional associative memory was defined as the ability to learn and remember emotional face–name associations. Forty younger (18–39 years) and forty older (60–85 years) adults completed behavioural and self-report interoceptive measures alongside an emotional face–name learning, recall, and recognition paradigm. No significant age differences emerged for interoceptive accuracy, attention, or insight. However, older adults reported greater trust in, and less worry about, bodily sensations, indicating selective changes in interoceptive beliefs. Older adults also showed a robust positivity bias, learning, recalling, and recognising happy face–name pairs more accurately and faster than angry or neutral pairs, whereas younger adults showed uniform performance across emotional conditions. Interoception–emotion relationships differed by age: Young adults’ interoceptive attention was positively associated with learning neutral pairs, while older adults’ interoceptive accuracy correlated with better encoding and recall of angry pairs. These findings demonstrate that age-related differences in emotional associative memory are partly rooted in changes to interoceptive processing and extend Socioemotional Selectivity Theory by identifying interoception as a physiological contributor to the positivity bias in ageing.
Socioemotional Selectivity Theory, age differences, associative memory, emotional processing, interoception, mind–body connection, positivity bias
1
Cawkwell, Sophie
dca5f6b3-f7c4-441e-be34-3a7230787bd1
Pauly-Takacs, Kata
66ed81b5-dba0-4eaa-8609-0d3da1cfeccf
Kolokotroni, Katerina Zoe
95a8adad-aaa3-472a-9d24-21a8fa1febaa
Pfeifer, Gaby
5ad2b108-e9c1-4a06-b41e-ad056977d54d
29 April 2026
Cawkwell, Sophie
dca5f6b3-f7c4-441e-be34-3a7230787bd1
Pauly-Takacs, Kata
66ed81b5-dba0-4eaa-8609-0d3da1cfeccf
Kolokotroni, Katerina Zoe
95a8adad-aaa3-472a-9d24-21a8fa1febaa
Pfeifer, Gaby
5ad2b108-e9c1-4a06-b41e-ad056977d54d
Cawkwell, Sophie, Pauly-Takacs, Kata, Kolokotroni, Katerina Zoe and Pfeifer, Gaby
(2026)
Age differences in the relationship between interoception and emotional processing.
Behavioural Sciences, 16 (672), , [672].
(doi:10.3390/bs16050672).
Abstract
Understanding how bodily signals shape emotional cognition across adulthood is critical for explaining age-related changes in emotional learning and memory. This study investigated age-related differences in interoceptive sensitivity and emotional associative memory. Interoceptive sensitivity was used as an umbrella term to refer to sensitivity to internal bodily signals across interoceptive accuracy, attention, beliefs, and insight, while emotional associative memory was defined as the ability to learn and remember emotional face–name associations. Forty younger (18–39 years) and forty older (60–85 years) adults completed behavioural and self-report interoceptive measures alongside an emotional face–name learning, recall, and recognition paradigm. No significant age differences emerged for interoceptive accuracy, attention, or insight. However, older adults reported greater trust in, and less worry about, bodily sensations, indicating selective changes in interoceptive beliefs. Older adults also showed a robust positivity bias, learning, recalling, and recognising happy face–name pairs more accurately and faster than angry or neutral pairs, whereas younger adults showed uniform performance across emotional conditions. Interoception–emotion relationships differed by age: Young adults’ interoceptive attention was positively associated with learning neutral pairs, while older adults’ interoceptive accuracy correlated with better encoding and recall of angry pairs. These findings demonstrate that age-related differences in emotional associative memory are partly rooted in changes to interoceptive processing and extend Socioemotional Selectivity Theory by identifying interoception as a physiological contributor to the positivity bias in ageing.
Text
2026_Pfeifer_Age differences in the relationship between interoception and emotional processing
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 14 April 2026
Published date: 29 April 2026
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 by the authors.
Keywords:
Socioemotional Selectivity Theory, age differences, associative memory, emotional processing, interoception, mind–body connection, positivity bias
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 511823
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/511823
PURE UUID: d401bed4-b3fa-47d3-becf-8b55d8126f3f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Jun 2026 16:37
Last modified: 05 Jun 2026 02:06
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Sophie Cawkwell
Author:
Kata Pauly-Takacs
Author:
Katerina Zoe Kolokotroni
Author:
Gaby Pfeifer
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics