The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Mindfulness-based interventions and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression, anxiety, and stress in adults with chronic conditions: a stratified subgroup meta-analysis

Mindfulness-based interventions and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression, anxiety, and stress in adults with chronic conditions: a stratified subgroup meta-analysis
Mindfulness-based interventions and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression, anxiety, and stress in adults with chronic conditions: a stratified subgroup meta-analysis

Anxiety, depression, and stress are common in individuals with diabetes and cancer and are associated with poor self-management and well-being. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are widely used in nonpharmacological treatments, but their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. We conducted a stratified subgroup meta-analysis to indirectly compare CBT and MBIs in adults with diabetes or cancer, examining moderators including condition, delivery modality, and dose. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and ScienceDirect through October 2025. Randomized trials (N = 107; n = 23,585) reporting validated post-intervention outcomes were pooled using random-effects models, with subgroup and meta-regression analyses performed in RStudio. Overall, CBT and MBIs significantly improved outcomes (SMD = -0.78). CBT showed larger effects, particularly for depression (SMD = -0.95) and diabetes (SMD = -1.21), although comparisons were indirect and heterogeneity was substantial. Stronger effects were observed in group-based interventions lasting ≥8 weeks, providing ≥8 contact hours, and including homework or booster components; higher session frequency was also associated with greater improvement (β = -0.086; p < 0.01). MBIs may offer scalable benefits, particularly in cancer care. These findings support condition-tailored psychosocial strategies, although results should be interpreted cautiously.

2731-4251
Ajele, Kenni Wojujutari
5a252aa8-0acc-439c-8217-84a5893173f9
Ramonkga, Botho Nanvula
Olasupo, Matthew O
Chidebe, Runcie C W
Ndetei, David Musyimi
Lwaleed, Bashir A
e7c59131-82ad-4a14-a227-7370e91e3f21
Armitage, Christopher J
88a48bb4-9c40-4d5c-944c-05a5768c6219
Ajele, Kenni Wojujutari
5a252aa8-0acc-439c-8217-84a5893173f9
Ramonkga, Botho Nanvula
Olasupo, Matthew O
Chidebe, Runcie C W
Ndetei, David Musyimi
Lwaleed, Bashir A
e7c59131-82ad-4a14-a227-7370e91e3f21
Armitage, Christopher J
88a48bb4-9c40-4d5c-944c-05a5768c6219

Ajele, Kenni Wojujutari, Ramonkga, Botho Nanvula, Olasupo, Matthew O, Chidebe, Runcie C W, Ndetei, David Musyimi, Lwaleed, Bashir A and Armitage, Christopher J (2026) Mindfulness-based interventions and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression, anxiety, and stress in adults with chronic conditions: a stratified subgroup meta-analysis. Npj mental health research. (doi:10.1038/s44184-026-00216-3).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Anxiety, depression, and stress are common in individuals with diabetes and cancer and are associated with poor self-management and well-being. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are widely used in nonpharmacological treatments, but their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. We conducted a stratified subgroup meta-analysis to indirectly compare CBT and MBIs in adults with diabetes or cancer, examining moderators including condition, delivery modality, and dose. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and ScienceDirect through October 2025. Randomized trials (N = 107; n = 23,585) reporting validated post-intervention outcomes were pooled using random-effects models, with subgroup and meta-regression analyses performed in RStudio. Overall, CBT and MBIs significantly improved outcomes (SMD = -0.78). CBT showed larger effects, particularly for depression (SMD = -0.95) and diabetes (SMD = -1.21), although comparisons were indirect and heterogeneity was substantial. Stronger effects were observed in group-based interventions lasting ≥8 weeks, providing ≥8 contact hours, and including homework or booster components; higher session frequency was also associated with greater improvement (β = -0.086; p < 0.01). MBIs may offer scalable benefits, particularly in cancer care. These findings support condition-tailored psychosocial strategies, although results should be interpreted cautiously.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 May 2026
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 May 2026
Additional Information: © 2026. The Author(s).

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 511870
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/511870
ISSN: 2731-4251
PURE UUID: eb8a15db-e9f5-4bd9-be6f-0ea0d1ad1b3a
ORCID for Bashir A Lwaleed: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5748-4892

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Jun 2026 16:49
Last modified: 09 Jun 2026 01:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kenni Wojujutari Ajele
Author: Botho Nanvula Ramonkga
Author: Matthew O Olasupo
Author: Runcie C W Chidebe
Author: David Musyimi Ndetei
Author: Christopher J Armitage

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×