Motion sickness with fore-and-aft and pitch oscillation: effect of the visual scene
Motion sickness with fore-and-aft and pitch oscillation: effect of the visual scene
Braking and acceleration expose car passengers to complex fore-and-aft and pitch motions that
can cause carsickness, with the effect depending on the visual scene. Previous studies in various
motion environments have suggested that external viewing reduces motion sickness relative to
internal viewing or wearing a blindfold however the influences of motion and vision on motion
sickness are thought to be interactive. The types of motion for which a visual scene can and cannot
modify sickness are yet to be established. The aim of this research was to advance understanding
of the effect of the visual scene on motion sickness caused by fore-and-aft oscillation,
combinations of fore-and-aft and pitch oscillation, and pitch oscillations.
The first experiment investigated the effect of the visual scene on motion sickness caused by low
frequency low magnitude fore-and-aft oscillation. Six groups of 20 subjects experienced one of six
visual scenes: an internal view of shapes; an external view of shapes; an external view of
horizontal lines; a ‘real’ three-dimensional external view; no view (blindfolded); or an internal
collimated view of shapes. Variations in the visual scene had no significant effect on motion
sickness caused by 0.1 Hz fore-and-aft oscillation with an acceleration magnitude of 0.89 ms-2
r.m.s. The absence of an influence of vision differs from the effects of the visual scene on motion
sickness in cars and coaches and suggested that carsickness is not solely caused by low
frequency fore-and-aft acceleration.
In a second experiment, six groups of 20 subjects were exposed to 0.1 Hz fore-and-aft oscillation
combined with 0.1 Hz pitch oscillation with a peak pitch displacement of 3.69°. For three groups of
subjects, the pitch displacement was 180° out-of-phase with the fore-and-aft displacement, such
that the resultant peak acceleration acting on subjects in the fore-and-aft direction was 1.89 ms-2.
The other three groups of subjects experienced the same fore-and-aft and pitch oscillations, but
presented out-of-phase so that the peak fore-and-aft acceleration of ±1.26 ms-2 r.m.s. was partially
offset by the pitch displacement of ±3.69°. Each subject experienced one of three viewing
conditions from the first experiment: internal, blindfolded or external. The visual scene influenced
the motion sickness caused by combined fore-and-aft and pitch oscillation regardless of whether
pitch motion was in-phase or out-of-phase with the fore-and-aft motion: there was less sickness
with an external forward view than with either an internal view or a blindfold. The effect of the
phase between the fore-and-aft and pitch motion depended on the visual scene: the phase
influenced motion sickness with a blindfold and with internal viewing but not with external viewing.
The effect of internal, blindfold and external viewing on motion sickness caused by 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4
Hz pitch oscillation was investigated in a third experiment with 180 subjects, 20 subjects in 9
conditions. The visual scene influenced motion sickness similarly with 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 Hz pitch
oscillation: external viewing reduced motion sickness relative to internal viewing. There was no
significant effect of pitch oscillation frequency.
Experimental results suggest that there is no effect of the visual scene on motion sickness caused
by fore-and-aft oscillation but the visual scene is influential when pitch motion is part or all of the
motion stimulus. The effect of the visual scene on motion sickness cannot be predicted without
specifying the motion stimulus causing sickness. Unlike previous models of motion sickness, a
conceptual model is suggested in which the expected visual signal is defined for a given vestibular
input. The model predicts that external viewing reduces motion sickness relative to internal or
blindfolded conditions when sickness is caused by motions inclusive of pitch oscillation. Model
predictions for the effect of the visual scene on motion sickness caused by other directions of
oscillation are considered.
Butler, Colleen Ann
cb8035ab-7e17-467b-83f4-b0d5dca1a228
March 2008
Butler, Colleen Ann
cb8035ab-7e17-467b-83f4-b0d5dca1a228
Butler, Colleen Ann
(2008)
Motion sickness with fore-and-aft and pitch oscillation: effect of the visual scene.
University of Southampton, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, Doctoral Thesis, 205pp.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Braking and acceleration expose car passengers to complex fore-and-aft and pitch motions that
can cause carsickness, with the effect depending on the visual scene. Previous studies in various
motion environments have suggested that external viewing reduces motion sickness relative to
internal viewing or wearing a blindfold however the influences of motion and vision on motion
sickness are thought to be interactive. The types of motion for which a visual scene can and cannot
modify sickness are yet to be established. The aim of this research was to advance understanding
of the effect of the visual scene on motion sickness caused by fore-and-aft oscillation,
combinations of fore-and-aft and pitch oscillation, and pitch oscillations.
The first experiment investigated the effect of the visual scene on motion sickness caused by low
frequency low magnitude fore-and-aft oscillation. Six groups of 20 subjects experienced one of six
visual scenes: an internal view of shapes; an external view of shapes; an external view of
horizontal lines; a ‘real’ three-dimensional external view; no view (blindfolded); or an internal
collimated view of shapes. Variations in the visual scene had no significant effect on motion
sickness caused by 0.1 Hz fore-and-aft oscillation with an acceleration magnitude of 0.89 ms-2
r.m.s. The absence of an influence of vision differs from the effects of the visual scene on motion
sickness in cars and coaches and suggested that carsickness is not solely caused by low
frequency fore-and-aft acceleration.
In a second experiment, six groups of 20 subjects were exposed to 0.1 Hz fore-and-aft oscillation
combined with 0.1 Hz pitch oscillation with a peak pitch displacement of 3.69°. For three groups of
subjects, the pitch displacement was 180° out-of-phase with the fore-and-aft displacement, such
that the resultant peak acceleration acting on subjects in the fore-and-aft direction was 1.89 ms-2.
The other three groups of subjects experienced the same fore-and-aft and pitch oscillations, but
presented out-of-phase so that the peak fore-and-aft acceleration of ±1.26 ms-2 r.m.s. was partially
offset by the pitch displacement of ±3.69°. Each subject experienced one of three viewing
conditions from the first experiment: internal, blindfolded or external. The visual scene influenced
the motion sickness caused by combined fore-and-aft and pitch oscillation regardless of whether
pitch motion was in-phase or out-of-phase with the fore-and-aft motion: there was less sickness
with an external forward view than with either an internal view or a blindfold. The effect of the
phase between the fore-and-aft and pitch motion depended on the visual scene: the phase
influenced motion sickness with a blindfold and with internal viewing but not with external viewing.
The effect of internal, blindfold and external viewing on motion sickness caused by 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4
Hz pitch oscillation was investigated in a third experiment with 180 subjects, 20 subjects in 9
conditions. The visual scene influenced motion sickness similarly with 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 Hz pitch
oscillation: external viewing reduced motion sickness relative to internal viewing. There was no
significant effect of pitch oscillation frequency.
Experimental results suggest that there is no effect of the visual scene on motion sickness caused
by fore-and-aft oscillation but the visual scene is influential when pitch motion is part or all of the
motion stimulus. The effect of the visual scene on motion sickness cannot be predicted without
specifying the motion stimulus causing sickness. Unlike previous models of motion sickness, a
conceptual model is suggested in which the expected visual signal is defined for a given vestibular
input. The model predicts that external viewing reduces motion sickness relative to internal or
blindfolded conditions when sickness is caused by motions inclusive of pitch oscillation. Model
predictions for the effect of the visual scene on motion sickness caused by other directions of
oscillation are considered.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: March 2008
Organisations:
University of Southampton, Human Sciences Group
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 51306
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/51306
PURE UUID: 34180ce0-a04c-441e-bdbb-76aabf693c5f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 May 2008
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 17:09
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Colleen Ann Butler
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics