Top team process: does 6+2=10?
Top team process: does 6+2=10?
This paper reports on the development of a questionnaire designed to measure the process aspects of the board as a working group. This initial study has been conducted among senior management teams due to the difficulty in gaining access to a sufficiently large sample of board teams at this development stage. The questionnaire was designed as one part of an investigation into standards of competence of boards of directors (Dulewicz et al. 1995; Institute of Directors, 1995). The questionnaire was distributed to the members of 54 “top teams”. A factor analysis of the response identified 12 main dimensions of group process. Reliability measures of these dimensions, which proved to be acceptable, are also reported. Finally, results of correlations between these 12 measures and three measures of group performance, derived from the team performance questionnaire, showed that the 12 process measures are significantly related to performance, and so have some validity.
47-62
Higgs, Malcolm
bd61667f-4b7c-4caf-9d79-aee907c03ae3
Dulewicz, Victor
bed1ba8c-a8c6-4b9f-94bc-8937da615bdb
1998
Higgs, Malcolm
bd61667f-4b7c-4caf-9d79-aee907c03ae3
Dulewicz, Victor
bed1ba8c-a8c6-4b9f-94bc-8937da615bdb
Higgs, Malcolm and Dulewicz, Victor
(1998)
Top team process: does 6+2=10?
Journal of Managerial Psychology, 13 (1/2), .
(doi:10.1108/02683949810369129).
Abstract
This paper reports on the development of a questionnaire designed to measure the process aspects of the board as a working group. This initial study has been conducted among senior management teams due to the difficulty in gaining access to a sufficiently large sample of board teams at this development stage. The questionnaire was designed as one part of an investigation into standards of competence of boards of directors (Dulewicz et al. 1995; Institute of Directors, 1995). The questionnaire was distributed to the members of 54 “top teams”. A factor analysis of the response identified 12 main dimensions of group process. Reliability measures of these dimensions, which proved to be acceptable, are also reported. Finally, results of correlations between these 12 measures and three measures of group performance, derived from the team performance questionnaire, showed that the 12 process measures are significantly related to performance, and so have some validity.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1998
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 51438
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/51438
ISSN: 0268-3946
PURE UUID: 95b11017-7c5f-4808-ae89-21633d1fcbda
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 29 May 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:57
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Victor Dulewicz
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics