A comparative study of fine depth perception in two-view 3D displays.
A comparative study of fine depth perception in two-view 3D displays.
In this paper we investigate human binocular depth perception on 3D electronic display technologies. Our study is motivated by the increasing use of 3D displays in applications, including geo-science and medicine, where critical decisions are made using fine binocular depth judgements. We predict subject performance for a depth judgement task using published specifications for seven different 3D displays. A repeated measures, within subjects experimental design is used to determine the effect that display and binocular disparity have on subject scores in the task. We find that there is reliable variation in participant performance with display and disparity, however this variation is not always consistent with our predictions from the display specifications. We also present subjective results that suggest user preference for a 3D display is not always a reliable guide to their ability to perform the task. We conclude that care must be taken in selecting 3D display systems for tasks that critically rely on human depth judgement.
three-dimensional displays, stereo, evaluation, methodology
440-450
Froner, Barbara
59d04f7c-ac0a-46ca-bbea-b2bd60cac17b
Holliman, Nicholas S.
9e824c4c-87be-4eb3-b7ca-782437f53ce3
Liversedge, Simon P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee
December 2008
Froner, Barbara
59d04f7c-ac0a-46ca-bbea-b2bd60cac17b
Holliman, Nicholas S.
9e824c4c-87be-4eb3-b7ca-782437f53ce3
Liversedge, Simon P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee
Froner, Barbara, Holliman, Nicholas S. and Liversedge, Simon P.
(2008)
A comparative study of fine depth perception in two-view 3D displays.
Displays, 29 (5), .
(doi:10.1016/j.displa.2008.03.001).
Abstract
In this paper we investigate human binocular depth perception on 3D electronic display technologies. Our study is motivated by the increasing use of 3D displays in applications, including geo-science and medicine, where critical decisions are made using fine binocular depth judgements. We predict subject performance for a depth judgement task using published specifications for seven different 3D displays. A repeated measures, within subjects experimental design is used to determine the effect that display and binocular disparity have on subject scores in the task. We find that there is reliable variation in participant performance with display and disparity, however this variation is not always consistent with our predictions from the display specifications. We also present subjective results that suggest user preference for a 3D display is not always a reliable guide to their ability to perform the task. We conclude that care must be taken in selecting 3D display systems for tasks that critically rely on human depth judgement.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: December 2008
Keywords:
three-dimensional displays, stereo, evaluation, methodology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 52608
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/52608
ISSN: 0141-9382
PURE UUID: fcd953ff-bb95-4ad1-a1d1-b54156ccf65b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Jul 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 10:38
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Barbara Froner
Author:
Nicholas S. Holliman
Author:
Simon P. Liversedge
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics