The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Response to 'The Stern Review: A Dual Critique'.

Response to 'The Stern Review: A Dual Critique'.
Response to 'The Stern Review: A Dual Critique'.
This article is a response to the articles in the previous issue of World Economics by Carter et al. and Byatt et al., which criticized the Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change’s assessment of the potential impacts of climate change. The authors demonstrate that the Stern Review does not underestimate the extent of uncertainty, and does not introduce bias by ignoring the effects of adaptation. The assessment does represent the effects of different socioeconomic futures on impact, and does explain the key sources of uncertainty. The indicators of impact used in the assessment either take adaptation into account (food security, coastal flooding) or represent exposure to impact, and hence indicate a demand for adaptation if impacts are to be avoided.
1468-1838
229-231
Arnell, Nigel
b3aeba9d-59fe-4608-aa60-4eae969212e2
Warren, Rachel
8d3ababb-ba65-4fa2-920b-185a8063b135
Nicholls, R.J.
4ce1e355-cc5d-4702-8124-820932c57076
Arnell, Nigel
b3aeba9d-59fe-4608-aa60-4eae969212e2
Warren, Rachel
8d3ababb-ba65-4fa2-920b-185a8063b135
Nicholls, R.J.
4ce1e355-cc5d-4702-8124-820932c57076

Arnell, Nigel, Warren, Rachel and Nicholls, R.J. (2007) Response to 'The Stern Review: A Dual Critique'. World Economics, 8 (1), 229-231.

Record type: Article

Abstract

This article is a response to the articles in the previous issue of World Economics by Carter et al. and Byatt et al., which criticized the Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change’s assessment of the potential impacts of climate change. The authors demonstrate that the Stern Review does not underestimate the extent of uncertainty, and does not introduce bias by ignoring the effects of adaptation. The assessment does represent the effects of different socioeconomic futures on impact, and does explain the key sources of uncertainty. The indicators of impact used in the assessment either take adaptation into account (food security, coastal flooding) or represent exposure to impact, and hence indicate a demand for adaptation if impacts are to be avoided.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: February 2007

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 53019
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/53019
ISSN: 1468-1838
PURE UUID: 4593edf1-4b84-4914-9323-5e59bcd35bb0
ORCID for R.J. Nicholls: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9715-1109

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Jul 2008
Last modified: 23 Jul 2022 01:52

Export record

Contributors

Author: Nigel Arnell
Author: Rachel Warren
Author: R.J. Nicholls ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×