The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Public participation and recycling performance in England: a comparison of tools for behaviour change

Public participation and recycling performance in England: a comparison of tools for behaviour change
Public participation and recycling performance in England: a comparison of tools for behaviour change
Improving the quality and capture of materials collected for recycling is at the top of the waste agenda for many English local authorities. In recent years, the focus has shifted away from general awareness raising techniques in favour of methods that can bring about behaviour change. This paper reports on three projects each using a different behaviour change based approach, which all aimed to increase participation in the recycling collection scheme and to reduce inclusion of non-targeted materials (“contamination”). The three projects—one doorstepping-based, one incentives-based and one delivering personalised feedback to residents were carried out in Portsmouth between 2005 and 2006 during a period where there were no major changes to the collection infrastructure. The findings show that personalised incentives and feedback were highly effective at reducing contamination. Both methods resulted in a halving of the number of households setting out contaminants on collection day. The feedback approachwas considerably more cost-effective than the other two approaches, costing £0.50 per household to implement the campaign and averaging £3.00 for every household which subsequently displayed behaviour change. There was little improvement in the quality of collected materials attributed to doorstepping alone. None of the projects resulted in significant changes in recycling scheme participation; however, this may be because participation was initially high. These findings suggest that behaviour change is most effectively brought about using simple, low-cost methods to engage with residents at the point of service delivery, i.e. by the collection crews whilst emptying bins. The challenge now is to integrate this into service delivery as standard.
recycling, participation, behaviour change, contamination, feedback, incentives, doorstepping
0921-3449
622-634
Timlett, R.E.
4af4765d-aa1e-4327-a2e3-eb419700f2a4
Williams, I.D.
c9d674ac-ee69-4937-ab43-17e716266e22
Timlett, R.E.
4af4765d-aa1e-4327-a2e3-eb419700f2a4
Williams, I.D.
c9d674ac-ee69-4937-ab43-17e716266e22

Timlett, R.E. and Williams, I.D. (2008) Public participation and recycling performance in England: a comparison of tools for behaviour change. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52 (4), 622-634. (doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.08.003).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Improving the quality and capture of materials collected for recycling is at the top of the waste agenda for many English local authorities. In recent years, the focus has shifted away from general awareness raising techniques in favour of methods that can bring about behaviour change. This paper reports on three projects each using a different behaviour change based approach, which all aimed to increase participation in the recycling collection scheme and to reduce inclusion of non-targeted materials (“contamination”). The three projects—one doorstepping-based, one incentives-based and one delivering personalised feedback to residents were carried out in Portsmouth between 2005 and 2006 during a period where there were no major changes to the collection infrastructure. The findings show that personalised incentives and feedback were highly effective at reducing contamination. Both methods resulted in a halving of the number of households setting out contaminants on collection day. The feedback approachwas considerably more cost-effective than the other two approaches, costing £0.50 per household to implement the campaign and averaging £3.00 for every household which subsequently displayed behaviour change. There was little improvement in the quality of collected materials attributed to doorstepping alone. None of the projects resulted in significant changes in recycling scheme participation; however, this may be because participation was initially high. These findings suggest that behaviour change is most effectively brought about using simple, low-cost methods to engage with residents at the point of service delivery, i.e. by the collection crews whilst emptying bins. The challenge now is to integrate this into service delivery as standard.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: February 2008
Keywords: recycling, participation, behaviour change, contamination, feedback, incentives, doorstepping
Organisations: Civil Engineering & the Environment

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 53062
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/53062
ISSN: 0921-3449
PURE UUID: 568921a3-b853-42a0-9772-d76ca18a726d
ORCID for I.D. Williams: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0121-1219

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Jul 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: R.E. Timlett
Author: I.D. Williams ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×