Can climate data from METEOSAT improve wildlife distribution models?
Can climate data from METEOSAT improve wildlife distribution models?
Global climate change generated by human activities is likely to affect agroecosystems in several ways: reinforcing intensification in northern and western Europe, and extensification in the Mediterranean countries. If we are to predict the consequences of global warming for wildlife, distribution models have to include climate data. The METEOSAT temporal series from EWBMS offers an attractive alternative to using climatic surfaces derived from ground stations. The aim of this paper is to test whether this climatic satellite data can improve the distribution models obtained previously by Suárez-Seoane et al. using habitat variables for three agro-steppe bird species: great bustard, little bustard and calandra lark in Spain. Rainfall, radiation balance, evapotranspiration and soil moisture images were incorporated together with the other variables used as predictors in the published stepwise GAM models. Changes in the predicted distributions from the habitat only and climate-habitats models were assessed by reference to the CORINE land cover categories. Inclusion of climatic variables from METEOSAT led to statistically superior models for all three species. There were large differences in the climatic variables selected and the original variables dropped among the species. Evapotranspiration variables were the most frequently selected. Maps of the differences between the habitat and climate-habitat models showed very different patterns for the three species. Inclusion of climate variables led to a wider range of land cover types being deemed suitable. Despite the statistical superiority of models, care is needed in deciding whether to use climatic variables because they may emphasize the fundamental rather than the realized niche. Used together, however, habitat and climate models can provide new insights into factors limiting species distributions and how they may respond to climate change.
629-636
Suárez-Seoane, S.
bd2636c2-b51f-4c9f-8574-f13a6c48d0df
Osborne, P.E.
c4d4261d-557c-4179-a24e-cdd7a98fb2b8
Rosema, A.
f6f15663-2639-4700-a50a-62daf0b30dc9
9 August 2004
Suárez-Seoane, S.
bd2636c2-b51f-4c9f-8574-f13a6c48d0df
Osborne, P.E.
c4d4261d-557c-4179-a24e-cdd7a98fb2b8
Rosema, A.
f6f15663-2639-4700-a50a-62daf0b30dc9
Suárez-Seoane, S., Osborne, P.E. and Rosema, A.
(2004)
Can climate data from METEOSAT improve wildlife distribution models?
Ecography, 27 (5), .
(doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03939.x).
Abstract
Global climate change generated by human activities is likely to affect agroecosystems in several ways: reinforcing intensification in northern and western Europe, and extensification in the Mediterranean countries. If we are to predict the consequences of global warming for wildlife, distribution models have to include climate data. The METEOSAT temporal series from EWBMS offers an attractive alternative to using climatic surfaces derived from ground stations. The aim of this paper is to test whether this climatic satellite data can improve the distribution models obtained previously by Suárez-Seoane et al. using habitat variables for three agro-steppe bird species: great bustard, little bustard and calandra lark in Spain. Rainfall, radiation balance, evapotranspiration and soil moisture images were incorporated together with the other variables used as predictors in the published stepwise GAM models. Changes in the predicted distributions from the habitat only and climate-habitats models were assessed by reference to the CORINE land cover categories. Inclusion of climatic variables from METEOSAT led to statistically superior models for all three species. There were large differences in the climatic variables selected and the original variables dropped among the species. Evapotranspiration variables were the most frequently selected. Maps of the differences between the habitat and climate-habitat models showed very different patterns for the three species. Inclusion of climate variables led to a wider range of land cover types being deemed suitable. Despite the statistical superiority of models, care is needed in deciding whether to use climatic variables because they may emphasize the fundamental rather than the realized niche. Used together, however, habitat and climate models can provide new insights into factors limiting species distributions and how they may respond to climate change.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Submitted date: 16 June 2004
Published date: 9 August 2004
Additional Information:
Suarez-Seoane S, Osborne P. E, Rosema A., (2004). "Can climate data from METEOSAT improve wildlife distribution models?." Ecography, 27, 629-636
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 53626
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/53626
ISSN: 0906-7590
PURE UUID: 2c4c1050-44bf-4feb-8036-993397a76f96
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Jul 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:42
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
S. Suárez-Seoane
Author:
A. Rosema
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics