Assessment of strength equations for overlapped tubular K-joints
Assessment of strength equations for overlapped tubular K-joints
The ISO Draft Code for offshore structures has included a formulation for the design of both gap and overlapped tubular K joints under axial loading. The formulation has been derived from a test database of 149 gap joints and 56 overlapped joints. The authors have also presented, in a series of recent articles, a strength formulation (Swansea formulation) for overlapped K joints, based on a database of joint strength generated by an extensive parametric finite element study. In this paper, the accuracy of these two formulations is assessed using the joints with equal brace inclination contained in both the test and the finite element databases. The results of the comparison show that, while the Swansea formulation can accurately back-predict the test data, the ISO formulation underpredicts the finite element data by an average of 13% and its performance is particularly poor for joints with low -gamma and medium to low beta. With the view that the Swansea formulation may be adopted to replace that proposed by ISO for design practice, the numerical constants in the Swansea formulation were simplified and a mean bias factor was derived to convert it to the characteristic format.
structural engineering, design engineering, joining processes, finite element analysis, mechanical strength
119-124
Gazzola, Fabio
8f7557e6-8ca9-471c-b452-db5876d73cda
Lee, Marcus M. K.
761bf1f1-cfee-4a9d-826e-2d6f4f31c8de
January 2002
Gazzola, Fabio
8f7557e6-8ca9-471c-b452-db5876d73cda
Lee, Marcus M. K.
761bf1f1-cfee-4a9d-826e-2d6f4f31c8de
Abstract
The ISO Draft Code for offshore structures has included a formulation for the design of both gap and overlapped tubular K joints under axial loading. The formulation has been derived from a test database of 149 gap joints and 56 overlapped joints. The authors have also presented, in a series of recent articles, a strength formulation (Swansea formulation) for overlapped K joints, based on a database of joint strength generated by an extensive parametric finite element study. In this paper, the accuracy of these two formulations is assessed using the joints with equal brace inclination contained in both the test and the finite element databases. The results of the comparison show that, while the Swansea formulation can accurately back-predict the test data, the ISO formulation underpredicts the finite element data by an average of 13% and its performance is particularly poor for joints with low -gamma and medium to low beta. With the view that the Swansea formulation may be adopted to replace that proposed by ISO for design practice, the numerical constants in the Swansea formulation were simplified and a mean bias factor was derived to convert it to the characteristic format.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: January 2002
Keywords:
structural engineering, design engineering, joining processes, finite element analysis, mechanical strength
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 53845
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/53845
ISSN: 0733-9445
PURE UUID: 1779f65d-22f3-4baf-9767-6dff8b37f37b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Jul 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 10:42
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Fabio Gazzola
Author:
Marcus M. K. Lee
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics