Self-evaluation in naturalistic context: the case of juvenile offenders

Neiss, Michelle B., Sedikides, Constantine, Shahinfar, Ariana and Kupersmidt, Janis B. (2006) Self-evaluation in naturalistic context: the case of juvenile offenders British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, (3), pp. 499-518. (doi:10.1348/014466605X64486).


[img] PDF unpubNeiss_Sedikides_Shahinfar_Kupersmidt_2006.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (262kB)


The authors investigated how self-evaluation motives (self-enhancement, self-assessment, self-verification, self-improvement - and also self-diminishment and no information) shape self-knowledge preferences in male incarcerated juvenile offenders (IJOs). IJOs responded to questions on how much they would like to receive and actually received each of six types of feedback (positive, truthful, improving, consistent, negative and no feedback) from each of six sources (teachers, parents, siblings, best friend, girlfriend and behavioural specialists or psychologists). IJOs disliked negative feedback and the lack of feedback. They preferred truthful feedback to consistent feedback, and received truthful and positive feedback more frequently than improving feedback. Additionally, they received more negative or no feedback from parents than they would like. Finally, IJOs expressed a preference for receiving more improving feedback from their girlfriends than they did. The study highlights the interplay of self-evaluation motives in IJOs and opens up promising research and rehabilitation directions.

Item Type: Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi:10.1348/014466605X64486
ISSNs: 0144-6665 (print)
Related URLs:
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
ePrint ID: 54661
Date :
Date Event
September 2006Published
Date Deposited: 29 Jul 2008
Last Modified: 16 Apr 2017 17:46
Further Information:Google Scholar

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item