The Short FES-I: a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling
The Short FES-I: a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling
 
  BACKGROUND: the 16-item Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) has been shown to have excellent reliability and construct validity. However, for practical and clinical purposes, a shortened version of the FES-I would be useful. OBJECTIVE: to develop and validate a shortened version of FES-I while preserving good psychometric properties. DESIGN: initial development of a shortened version using data from a UK survey (Short FES-I; n = 704), test of reliability and validity of the Short FES-I using data from a Dutch survey (n = 300). SETTING: community samples. METHODS: comparison of reliability and validity of the Short FES-I and the FES-I in a random sample of 193 people aged between 70 and 92. RESULTS: the internal and 4-week test-retest reliability of the Short FES-I is excellent (Cronbach's alpha 0.92, intra-class coefficient 0.83) and comparable to the FES-I. The correlation between the Short FES-I and the FES-I is 0.97. Patterns in differences with respect to mean scores according to age, sex, falls history, and overall fear of falling are similar for the Short FES-I and the FES-I. The FES-I had slightly better power to discriminate between groups differentiated by age, sex, falls history, and fear falling, but differences are small. CONCLUSIONS: the Short FES-I is a good and feasible measure to assess fear of falling in older persons. However, if researchers or clinicians are particularly interested in the distributions of specific fear of falling-related activities not included in the Short FES-I, the use of the full FES-I is recommended.
  
  
  45-50
  
    
      Kempen, Gertrudis.I.J.
      
        f42ef71e-3a9f-45da-a2d5-ca5bb1396563
      
     
  
    
      Yardley, Lucy.
      
        64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
      
     
  
    
      van Haastregt, Jolanda.C.M.
      
        f921963c-de78-44ab-8d66-200eaf9236f2
      
     
  
    
      Zijlstra, G.A.
      
        68de99c3-e80d-4ff6-9294-b97ece298beb
      
     
  
    
      Beyer, Nina.
      
        77bc85db-9291-49d3-87f7-154d7bee5310
      
     
  
    
      Hauer, Klaus.
      
        ad6ef2b5-d9db-42da-9e02-3c263a0beadb
      
     
  
    
      Todd, Chris.
      
        d7956023-02d3-445b-870f-136d8b464e4e
      
     
  
  
   
  
  
    
      20 November 2007
    
    
  
  
    
      Kempen, Gertrudis.I.J.
      
        f42ef71e-3a9f-45da-a2d5-ca5bb1396563
      
     
  
    
      Yardley, Lucy.
      
        64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
      
     
  
    
      van Haastregt, Jolanda.C.M.
      
        f921963c-de78-44ab-8d66-200eaf9236f2
      
     
  
    
      Zijlstra, G.A.
      
        68de99c3-e80d-4ff6-9294-b97ece298beb
      
     
  
    
      Beyer, Nina.
      
        77bc85db-9291-49d3-87f7-154d7bee5310
      
     
  
    
      Hauer, Klaus.
      
        ad6ef2b5-d9db-42da-9e02-3c263a0beadb
      
     
  
    
      Todd, Chris.
      
        d7956023-02d3-445b-870f-136d8b464e4e
      
     
  
       
    
 
  
    
      
  
  
  
  
  
  
    Kempen, Gertrudis.I.J., Yardley, Lucy., van Haastregt, Jolanda.C.M., Zijlstra, G.A., Beyer, Nina., Hauer, Klaus. and Todd, Chris.
  
  
  
  
   
    (2007)
  
  
    
    The Short FES-I: a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling.
  
  
  
  
    Age and Ageing, 37 (1), .
  
   (doi:10.1093/ageing/afm157). 
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
    
      
        
          Abstract
          BACKGROUND: the 16-item Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) has been shown to have excellent reliability and construct validity. However, for practical and clinical purposes, a shortened version of the FES-I would be useful. OBJECTIVE: to develop and validate a shortened version of FES-I while preserving good psychometric properties. DESIGN: initial development of a shortened version using data from a UK survey (Short FES-I; n = 704), test of reliability and validity of the Short FES-I using data from a Dutch survey (n = 300). SETTING: community samples. METHODS: comparison of reliability and validity of the Short FES-I and the FES-I in a random sample of 193 people aged between 70 and 92. RESULTS: the internal and 4-week test-retest reliability of the Short FES-I is excellent (Cronbach's alpha 0.92, intra-class coefficient 0.83) and comparable to the FES-I. The correlation between the Short FES-I and the FES-I is 0.97. Patterns in differences with respect to mean scores according to age, sex, falls history, and overall fear of falling are similar for the Short FES-I and the FES-I. The FES-I had slightly better power to discriminate between groups differentiated by age, sex, falls history, and fear falling, but differences are small. CONCLUSIONS: the Short FES-I is a good and feasible measure to assess fear of falling in older persons. However, if researchers or clinicians are particularly interested in the distributions of specific fear of falling-related activities not included in the Short FES-I, the use of the full FES-I is recommended.
        
        This record has no associated files available for download.
       
    
    
   
  
  
  More information
  
    
      Published date: 20 November 2007
 
    
  
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
  
        Identifiers
        Local EPrints ID: 54771
        URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/54771
        
          
        
        
        
          ISSN: 0002-0729
        
        
          PURE UUID: e1740e65-5ed8-474c-9c20-cc35176b4ceb
        
  
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
            
              
            
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
  
  Catalogue record
  Date deposited: 31 Jul 2008
  Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:03
  Export record
  
  
   Altmetrics
   
   
  
 
 
  
    
    
      Contributors
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Gertrudis.I.J. Kempen
            
          
        
      
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Jolanda.C.M. van Haastregt
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              G.A. Zijlstra
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Nina. Beyer
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Klaus. Hauer
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Chris. Todd
            
          
        
      
      
      
    
  
   
  
    Download statistics
    
      Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
      
      View more statistics