The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The Short FES-I: a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling

The Short FES-I: a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling
The Short FES-I: a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling
BACKGROUND: the 16-item Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) has been shown to have excellent reliability and construct validity. However, for practical and clinical purposes, a shortened version of the FES-I would be useful. OBJECTIVE: to develop and validate a shortened version of FES-I while preserving good psychometric properties. DESIGN: initial development of a shortened version using data from a UK survey (Short FES-I; n = 704), test of reliability and validity of the Short FES-I using data from a Dutch survey (n = 300). SETTING: community samples. METHODS: comparison of reliability and validity of the Short FES-I and the FES-I in a random sample of 193 people aged between 70 and 92. RESULTS: the internal and 4-week test-retest reliability of the Short FES-I is excellent (Cronbach's alpha 0.92, intra-class coefficient 0.83) and comparable to the FES-I. The correlation between the Short FES-I and the FES-I is 0.97. Patterns in differences with respect to mean scores according to age, sex, falls history, and overall fear of falling are similar for the Short FES-I and the FES-I. The FES-I had slightly better power to discriminate between groups differentiated by age, sex, falls history, and fear falling, but differences are small. CONCLUSIONS: the Short FES-I is a good and feasible measure to assess fear of falling in older persons. However, if researchers or clinicians are particularly interested in the distributions of specific fear of falling-related activities not included in the Short FES-I, the use of the full FES-I is recommended.
0002-0729
45-50
Kempen, Gertrudis.I.J.
f42ef71e-3a9f-45da-a2d5-ca5bb1396563
Yardley, Lucy.
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
van Haastregt, Jolanda.C.M.
f921963c-de78-44ab-8d66-200eaf9236f2
Zijlstra, G.A.
68de99c3-e80d-4ff6-9294-b97ece298beb
Beyer, Nina.
77bc85db-9291-49d3-87f7-154d7bee5310
Hauer, Klaus.
ad6ef2b5-d9db-42da-9e02-3c263a0beadb
Todd, Chris.
d7956023-02d3-445b-870f-136d8b464e4e
Kempen, Gertrudis.I.J.
f42ef71e-3a9f-45da-a2d5-ca5bb1396563
Yardley, Lucy.
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
van Haastregt, Jolanda.C.M.
f921963c-de78-44ab-8d66-200eaf9236f2
Zijlstra, G.A.
68de99c3-e80d-4ff6-9294-b97ece298beb
Beyer, Nina.
77bc85db-9291-49d3-87f7-154d7bee5310
Hauer, Klaus.
ad6ef2b5-d9db-42da-9e02-3c263a0beadb
Todd, Chris.
d7956023-02d3-445b-870f-136d8b464e4e

Kempen, Gertrudis.I.J., Yardley, Lucy., van Haastregt, Jolanda.C.M., Zijlstra, G.A., Beyer, Nina., Hauer, Klaus. and Todd, Chris. (2007) The Short FES-I: a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling. Age and Ageing, 37 (1), 45-50. (doi:10.1093/ageing/afm157).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: the 16-item Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) has been shown to have excellent reliability and construct validity. However, for practical and clinical purposes, a shortened version of the FES-I would be useful. OBJECTIVE: to develop and validate a shortened version of FES-I while preserving good psychometric properties. DESIGN: initial development of a shortened version using data from a UK survey (Short FES-I; n = 704), test of reliability and validity of the Short FES-I using data from a Dutch survey (n = 300). SETTING: community samples. METHODS: comparison of reliability and validity of the Short FES-I and the FES-I in a random sample of 193 people aged between 70 and 92. RESULTS: the internal and 4-week test-retest reliability of the Short FES-I is excellent (Cronbach's alpha 0.92, intra-class coefficient 0.83) and comparable to the FES-I. The correlation between the Short FES-I and the FES-I is 0.97. Patterns in differences with respect to mean scores according to age, sex, falls history, and overall fear of falling are similar for the Short FES-I and the FES-I. The FES-I had slightly better power to discriminate between groups differentiated by age, sex, falls history, and fear falling, but differences are small. CONCLUSIONS: the Short FES-I is a good and feasible measure to assess fear of falling in older persons. However, if researchers or clinicians are particularly interested in the distributions of specific fear of falling-related activities not included in the Short FES-I, the use of the full FES-I is recommended.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 20 November 2007

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 54771
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/54771
ISSN: 0002-0729
PURE UUID: e1740e65-5ed8-474c-9c20-cc35176b4ceb
ORCID for Lucy. Yardley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-883X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Jul 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:03

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gertrudis.I.J. Kempen
Author: Lucy. Yardley ORCID iD
Author: Jolanda.C.M. van Haastregt
Author: G.A. Zijlstra
Author: Nina. Beyer
Author: Klaus. Hauer
Author: Chris. Todd

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×