Quantum artificial neural networks: architectures and components
Quantum artificial neural networks: architectures and components
It is shown by classical simulation and experimentation that quantum artificial neural networks (QUANNs) are more efficient and in some cases more powerful than classical artificial neural networks (CLANNs) for a variety of experimental tasks. This effect is particularly noticeable with larger and more complex domains. The gain in efficiency is achieved with no generalisation loss in most cases. QUANNs are also more powerful than CLANNs, again for some of the tasks examined, in terms of what the network can learn. What is more, it appears that not all components of a QUANN architecture need to be quantum for these advantages to surface. It is demonstrated that a fully quantum neural network has no advantage over a partly quantum network and may in fact produce worse results. Overall, this work provides a first insight into the expected behaviour of individual components of QUANNs, if and when quantum hardware is ever built, and raises questions about the interface between quantum and classical components of future QUANNs.
231-255
Narayanan, Ajit
de76071a-3593-47e7-a4cd-05af42ed4ad6
Menneer, Tammy
d684eaf6-1494-4004-9973-cb8ccc628efa
October 2000
Narayanan, Ajit
de76071a-3593-47e7-a4cd-05af42ed4ad6
Menneer, Tammy
d684eaf6-1494-4004-9973-cb8ccc628efa
Narayanan, Ajit and Menneer, Tammy
(2000)
Quantum artificial neural networks: architectures and components.
Information Sciences, 128 (3-4), .
(doi:10.1016/S0020-0255(00)00055-4).
Abstract
It is shown by classical simulation and experimentation that quantum artificial neural networks (QUANNs) are more efficient and in some cases more powerful than classical artificial neural networks (CLANNs) for a variety of experimental tasks. This effect is particularly noticeable with larger and more complex domains. The gain in efficiency is achieved with no generalisation loss in most cases. QUANNs are also more powerful than CLANNs, again for some of the tasks examined, in terms of what the network can learn. What is more, it appears that not all components of a QUANN architecture need to be quantum for these advantages to surface. It is demonstrated that a fully quantum neural network has no advantage over a partly quantum network and may in fact produce worse results. Overall, this work provides a first insight into the expected behaviour of individual components of QUANNs, if and when quantum hardware is ever built, and raises questions about the interface between quantum and classical components of future QUANNs.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: October 2000
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 54915
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/54915
ISSN: 0020-0255
PURE UUID: 1b8892f8-456a-4cad-97e8-79df176e37ea
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Aug 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 10:51
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Ajit Narayanan
Author:
Tammy Menneer
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics