Issues of scale and uncertainty in the global remote sensing of disease
Issues of scale and uncertainty in the global remote sensing of disease
Scale and uncertainty are important issues for the global prediction of disease. Disease mapping over the entire surface of the Earth usually involves the use of remotely sensed imagery to provide environmental covariates of disease risk or disease vector density. It further implies that the spatial resolution of such imagery is relatively coarse (e.g., 8 or 1km). Use of a coarse spatial resolution limits the information that can be extracted from imagery and has important effects on the results of epidemiological analyses. This paper discusses geostatistical models for (i) characterizing the scale(s) of spatial variation in data and (ii) changing the scale of measurement of both the data and the geostatistical model. Uncertainty is introduced, highlighting the fact that most epidemiologists are interested in accuracy, aspects of which can be estimated with measurable quantities. This paper emphasizes the distinction between data- and model-based methods of accuracy assessment and gives examples of both. The key problem of validating global maps is considered.
79-118
Atkinson, P.M.
96e96579-56fe-424d-a21c-17b6eed13b0b
Graham, A.J.
42dcec23-42cf-4941-8df0-fcb75da4223e
2006
Atkinson, P.M.
96e96579-56fe-424d-a21c-17b6eed13b0b
Graham, A.J.
42dcec23-42cf-4941-8df0-fcb75da4223e
Atkinson, P.M. and Graham, A.J.
(2006)
Issues of scale and uncertainty in the global remote sensing of disease.
Advances in Parasitology, 62, .
Abstract
Scale and uncertainty are important issues for the global prediction of disease. Disease mapping over the entire surface of the Earth usually involves the use of remotely sensed imagery to provide environmental covariates of disease risk or disease vector density. It further implies that the spatial resolution of such imagery is relatively coarse (e.g., 8 or 1km). Use of a coarse spatial resolution limits the information that can be extracted from imagery and has important effects on the results of epidemiological analyses. This paper discusses geostatistical models for (i) characterizing the scale(s) of spatial variation in data and (ii) changing the scale of measurement of both the data and the geostatistical model. Uncertainty is introduced, highlighting the fact that most epidemiologists are interested in accuracy, aspects of which can be estimated with measurable quantities. This paper emphasizes the distinction between data- and model-based methods of accuracy assessment and gives examples of both. The key problem of validating global maps is considered.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2006
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 54981
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/54981
ISSN: 0065-308X
PURE UUID: 8f370dcc-fad9-40bf-97b8-a826ee9efaa4
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Aug 2008
Last modified: 09 Jan 2022 02:45
Export record
Contributors
Author:
P.M. Atkinson
Author:
A.J. Graham
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics