Why is the rate of single parenthood lower in Canada than in the U.S.? A dynamic equilibrium analysis of welfare policies
Why is the rate of single parenthood lower in Canada than in the U.S.? A dynamic equilibrium analysis of welfare policies
A critical question in the design of welfare policies is whether to
target aid according to household composition, as was done in the U.S. under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)\ program, or to rely exclusively on means-testing, as in Canada. Restricting aid to single mothers, for instance, has the potential to distort behavior along three demographic margins: marriage, fertility and divorce. We contrast the Canadian and the U.S. policies within an equilibrium model of household formation and human capital investment on children. Policy differences we
consider are: eligibility, dependence of transfers on the number of children, and generosity of transfers. Our simulations indicate that the policy differences can account for the higher rate of single-parenthood in the U.S. They also show that Canadian welfare policy is more effective for fostering human capital accumulation among children from poor families. Interestingly, a majority of agents in our benchmark economy prefers a
welfare system that targets single mothers (as the U.S. system does), yet does not (unlike the U.S. system) make transfers dependent on the number of children.
59-89
Guner, Nezih
b5970487-aab8-4203-bf32-22d894c9e364
Knowles, John
0c41d933-fc6d-4a91-9e0f-0b07e5db84ac
February 2009
Guner, Nezih
b5970487-aab8-4203-bf32-22d894c9e364
Knowles, John
0c41d933-fc6d-4a91-9e0f-0b07e5db84ac
Guner, Nezih and Knowles, John
(2009)
Why is the rate of single parenthood lower in Canada than in the U.S.? A dynamic equilibrium analysis of welfare policies.
Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d'Economique, 42 (1), .
(doi:10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01499.x).
Abstract
A critical question in the design of welfare policies is whether to
target aid according to household composition, as was done in the U.S. under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)\ program, or to rely exclusively on means-testing, as in Canada. Restricting aid to single mothers, for instance, has the potential to distort behavior along three demographic margins: marriage, fertility and divorce. We contrast the Canadian and the U.S. policies within an equilibrium model of household formation and human capital investment on children. Policy differences we
consider are: eligibility, dependence of transfers on the number of children, and generosity of transfers. Our simulations indicate that the policy differences can account for the higher rate of single-parenthood in the U.S. They also show that Canadian welfare policy is more effective for fostering human capital accumulation among children from poor families. Interestingly, a majority of agents in our benchmark economy prefers a
welfare system that targets single mothers (as the U.S. system does), yet does not (unlike the U.S. system) make transfers dependent on the number of children.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: February 2009
Organisations:
Economics
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 55068
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/55068
ISSN: 0008-4085
PURE UUID: 84d38558-042c-4159-ba5b-7b2d166b844a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Aug 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 10:52
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Nezih Guner
Author:
John Knowles
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics