Conservatives and racists: inferential role semantics and pejoratives

Whiting, Daniel J. (2008) Conservatives and racists: inferential role semantics and pejoratives Philosophia, 36, (3), pp. 375-388. (doi:10.1007/s11406-007-9109-1).


[img] PDF Conservatives_and_racists_-_Inferential_Role_Semantics_and_Pejoratives_-_Daniel_Whiting.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (219kB)


According to inferential role semantics (IRS), for any given expression to possess a particular meaning one must be disposed to make or, alternatively, acknowledge as correct certain inferential transitions involving it. As Williamson points out, pejoratives such as ‘Boche’ seem to provide a counter-example to IRS. Many speakers are neither disposed to use such expressions nor consider it proper to do so. But it does not follow, as IRS appears to entail, that such speakers do not understand pejoratives or that they lack meaning. In this paper, I examine recent responses to this problem by Boghossian and Brandom and argue that their proposed construal of the kind of inferential rules governing a pejorative such as ‘Boche’ is to be ruled out on the grounds that it is non-conservative. I defend the appeal to conservatism in this instance against criticism and, in doing so, propose an alternative approach to pejoratives on behalf of IRS that resolves the problem Williamson poses.

Item Type: Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi:10.1007/s11406-007-9109-1
ISSNs: 0048-3893 (print)
Keywords: inferentialism, meaning, pejoratives, language, inferential role semantics
ePrint ID: 55234
Date :
Date Event
September 2008Published
Date Deposited: 05 Aug 2008
Last Modified: 16 Apr 2017 17:44
Further Information:Google Scholar

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item