Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the lower trapezius muscle: technical description and reliability
Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the lower trapezius muscle: technical description and reliability
Study design: Exploratory and repeated measures reliability.
Background: Shoulder dysfunction is common and often difficult to diagnose and treat. The trapezius muscle is an important stabilizer and primary mover of the scapula. The potential use of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) to evaluate scapular muscle function warrants investigation.
Objectives: To establish a procedure for imaging the thickness of the lower trapezius muscle and to examine reliability, within and between investigators.
Methods: In 16 asymptomatic subjects (12 female), aged 20-41 years, 3 investigators used RUSI to image the left lower trapezius muscle with the subject at rest in prone. The principal investigator (Investigator 1) took 3 images on each of 2 days, while the other 2 investigators took 2 images each on the second day. All measurements of lower trapezius muscle thickness were made off-line, at a point 3cm lateral to the lateral edge of the spinous processes. To also obtain within scan reliability, each of the images taken by Investigator 1, once displayed on the scanner’s screen, were measured 3 times. Investigator 1 also measured lower trapezius muscle thickness 1cm medial to this site. Reliability was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the Bland and Altman plot.
Results: The intrarater within scan reliability at the lateral site was ICC 3,3 = 0.99, (95% CI: 0.98 to 1.0).The intrarater between scan reliability (within day using the mean values of 3 measurements off the screen) at the lateral site, medial site, and combined sites (mean of medial and lateral) were ICC3,3=0.96; (95%CI = 0.90 to 0.98); ICC3,2=0.90 (95%CI = 0.78 to 0.96); and ICC3,2=0.99 (95%CI = 0.99 to 1.0) respectively. Intrarater (between day) reliability was good for the lateral site and combined sites (ICC3,3=0.91; 95%CI = 0.74 to 0.96 and ICC3,3 = 0.90; 95%CI = 0.70 to 0.96 respectively) and moderate for the medial site (ICC3,3=0.89; 95%CI= 0.68 to 0.96). Interrater reliability (between investigators) was also moderate (ICC2, 2=0.88; 95%CI = 0.73 to 0.96). Mean lower trapezius muscle thickness was approximately 3.1mm (SD=0.8).
Conclusion: Thickness of the lower trapezius muscle can be measured reliably with RUSI.
rehabilitative ultrasound imaging, lower trapezius muscle, measurement, muscle size, physiotherapy, morphology, morphometry
620-626
O’Sullivan, Cliona
3b0fc531-24c5-4198-855a-13bfa912238c
Bentman, Susanna
12bfa672-52b9-4acb-b283-24ac8bab2027
Bennett, Kathleen
58a60f6b-a255-45ff-ad1c-78fa2f41cf13
Stokes, Maria
71730503-70ce-4e67-b7ea-a3e54579717f
October 2007
O’Sullivan, Cliona
3b0fc531-24c5-4198-855a-13bfa912238c
Bentman, Susanna
12bfa672-52b9-4acb-b283-24ac8bab2027
Bennett, Kathleen
58a60f6b-a255-45ff-ad1c-78fa2f41cf13
Stokes, Maria
71730503-70ce-4e67-b7ea-a3e54579717f
O’Sullivan, Cliona, Bentman, Susanna, Bennett, Kathleen and Stokes, Maria
(2007)
Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the lower trapezius muscle: technical description and reliability.
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 37 (10), .
(doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2446).
Abstract
Study design: Exploratory and repeated measures reliability.
Background: Shoulder dysfunction is common and often difficult to diagnose and treat. The trapezius muscle is an important stabilizer and primary mover of the scapula. The potential use of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) to evaluate scapular muscle function warrants investigation.
Objectives: To establish a procedure for imaging the thickness of the lower trapezius muscle and to examine reliability, within and between investigators.
Methods: In 16 asymptomatic subjects (12 female), aged 20-41 years, 3 investigators used RUSI to image the left lower trapezius muscle with the subject at rest in prone. The principal investigator (Investigator 1) took 3 images on each of 2 days, while the other 2 investigators took 2 images each on the second day. All measurements of lower trapezius muscle thickness were made off-line, at a point 3cm lateral to the lateral edge of the spinous processes. To also obtain within scan reliability, each of the images taken by Investigator 1, once displayed on the scanner’s screen, were measured 3 times. Investigator 1 also measured lower trapezius muscle thickness 1cm medial to this site. Reliability was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the Bland and Altman plot.
Results: The intrarater within scan reliability at the lateral site was ICC 3,3 = 0.99, (95% CI: 0.98 to 1.0).The intrarater between scan reliability (within day using the mean values of 3 measurements off the screen) at the lateral site, medial site, and combined sites (mean of medial and lateral) were ICC3,3=0.96; (95%CI = 0.90 to 0.98); ICC3,2=0.90 (95%CI = 0.78 to 0.96); and ICC3,2=0.99 (95%CI = 0.99 to 1.0) respectively. Intrarater (between day) reliability was good for the lateral site and combined sites (ICC3,3=0.91; 95%CI = 0.74 to 0.96 and ICC3,3 = 0.90; 95%CI = 0.70 to 0.96 respectively) and moderate for the medial site (ICC3,3=0.89; 95%CI= 0.68 to 0.96). Interrater reliability (between investigators) was also moderate (ICC2, 2=0.88; 95%CI = 0.73 to 0.96). Mean lower trapezius muscle thickness was approximately 3.1mm (SD=0.8).
Conclusion: Thickness of the lower trapezius muscle can be measured reliably with RUSI.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: October 2007
Keywords:
rehabilitative ultrasound imaging, lower trapezius muscle, measurement, muscle size, physiotherapy, morphology, morphometry
Organisations:
Health Profs and Rehabilitation Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 55257
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/55257
ISSN: 0190-6011
PURE UUID: bcbbc587-0332-45c3-9d04-98083143f3dc
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Aug 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:30
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Cliona O’Sullivan
Author:
Susanna Bentman
Author:
Kathleen Bennett
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics