The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the lower trapezius muscle: technical description and reliability

O’Sullivan, Cliona, Bentman, Susanna, Bennett, Kathleen and Stokes, Maria (2007) Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the lower trapezius muscle: technical description and reliability Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 37, (10), pp. 620-626. (doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2446).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Study design: Exploratory and repeated measures reliability. Background: Shoulder dysfunction is common and often difficult to diagnose and treat. The trapezius muscle is an important stabilizer and primary mover of the scapula. The potential use of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) to evaluate scapular muscle function warrants investigation. Objectives: To establish a procedure for imaging the thickness of the lower trapezius muscle and to examine reliability, within and between investigators. Methods: In 16 asymptomatic subjects (12 female), aged 20-41 years, 3 investigators used RUSI to image the left lower trapezius muscle with the subject at rest in prone. The principal investigator (Investigator 1) took 3 images on each of 2 days, while the other 2 investigators took 2 images each on the second day. All measurements of lower trapezius muscle thickness were made off-line, at a point 3cm lateral to the lateral edge of the spinous processes. To also obtain within scan reliability, each of the images taken by Investigator 1, once displayed on the scanner’s screen, were measured 3 times. Investigator 1 also measured lower trapezius muscle thickness 1cm medial to this site. Reliability was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the Bland and Altman plot. Results: The intrarater within scan reliability at the lateral site was ICC 3,3 = 0.99, (95% CI: 0.98 to 1.0).The intrarater between scan reliability (within day using the mean values of 3 measurements off the screen) at the lateral site, medial site, and combined sites (mean of medial and lateral) were ICC3,3=0.96; (95%CI = 0.90 to 0.98); ICC3,2=0.90 (95%CI = 0.78 to 0.96); and ICC3,2=0.99 (95%CI = 0.99 to 1.0) respectively. Intrarater (between day) reliability was good for the lateral site and combined sites (ICC3,3=0.91; 95%CI = 0.74 to 0.96 and ICC3,3 = 0.90; 95%CI = 0.70 to 0.96 respectively) and moderate for the medial site (ICC3,3=0.89; 95%CI= 0.68 to 0.96). Interrater reliability (between investigators) was also moderate (ICC2, 2=0.88; 95%CI = 0.73 to 0.96). Mean lower trapezius muscle thickness was approximately 3.1mm (SD=0.8). Conclusion: Thickness of the lower trapezius muscle can be measured reliably with RUSI.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: October 2007
Keywords: rehabilitative ultrasound imaging, lower trapezius muscle, measurement, muscle size, physiotherapy, morphology, morphometry
Organisations: Health Profs and Rehabilitation Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 55257
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/55257
ISSN: 0190-6011
PURE UUID: bcbbc587-0332-45c3-9d04-98083143f3dc
ORCID for Maria Stokes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4204-0890

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Aug 2008
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 14:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Cliona O’Sullivan
Author: Susanna Bentman
Author: Kathleen Bennett
Author: Maria Stokes ORCID iD

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×