The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

To what extent are the needs of severely disabled people met by community rehabilitation services? A follow-up study.

To what extent are the needs of severely disabled people met by community rehabilitation services? A follow-up study.
To what extent are the needs of severely disabled people met by community rehabilitation services? A follow-up study.
Purpose : To evaluate which needs of disabled people would be met over a one year follow-up period and to examine which factors would be predictive of identifying those people who had more needs met from those who had fewer needs met. Method: A follow-up study of a cohort of community dwelling disabled people (aged 16± 65) from two NHS Health Districts in Southern England with contrasting patterns of rehabilitation provision, who had participated in a cross-sectional interview study one year previously which had assessed their met and unmet needs. The Southampton Needs Assessment Questionnaire was used to examine needs. Disability was evaluated with the OPCS Disability and Severity Scales and perceived health status with the SF-36. Results : Participation rate at follow-up was 92%. Of the 300 baseline unmet needs reported by 69 of the 77 participants 33% had been met at follow-up. People whose disability had increased more and/or whose mental health status had improved more had greater percentages of their baseline needs met. There was a non-significant trend for smaller percentages of baseline needs to be met in Basingstoke than in Southampton. Conclusions : At ground level, disabled people’s views were taken into account, to some extent, in the provision of rehabilitation services. This input should be made at a higher level, in the overall shaping of services.
0963-8288
855-861
Kersten, Paula
039a54d8-5629-47fd-ba55-5b60e7d3e7dc
McLellan, David Lindsay
3ccccfd6-5212-47f6-b6d5-3e555edbd291
George, Steve
bdfc752b-f67e-4490-8dc0-99bfaeb046ca
Smith, Jennifer.A.E.
2032eb1a-9f2f-4b23-9068-6d2059952e11
Mullee, Mark.A.
fd3f91c3-5e95-4f56-8d73-260824eeb362
Kersten, Paula
039a54d8-5629-47fd-ba55-5b60e7d3e7dc
McLellan, David Lindsay
3ccccfd6-5212-47f6-b6d5-3e555edbd291
George, Steve
bdfc752b-f67e-4490-8dc0-99bfaeb046ca
Smith, Jennifer.A.E.
2032eb1a-9f2f-4b23-9068-6d2059952e11
Mullee, Mark.A.
fd3f91c3-5e95-4f56-8d73-260824eeb362

Kersten, Paula, McLellan, David Lindsay, George, Steve, Smith, Jennifer.A.E. and Mullee, Mark.A. (2000) To what extent are the needs of severely disabled people met by community rehabilitation services? A follow-up study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22 (18), 855-861.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate which needs of disabled people would be met over a one year follow-up period and to examine which factors would be predictive of identifying those people who had more needs met from those who had fewer needs met. Method: A follow-up study of a cohort of community dwelling disabled people (aged 16± 65) from two NHS Health Districts in Southern England with contrasting patterns of rehabilitation provision, who had participated in a cross-sectional interview study one year previously which had assessed their met and unmet needs. The Southampton Needs Assessment Questionnaire was used to examine needs. Disability was evaluated with the OPCS Disability and Severity Scales and perceived health status with the SF-36. Results : Participation rate at follow-up was 92%. Of the 300 baseline unmet needs reported by 69 of the 77 participants 33% had been met at follow-up. People whose disability had increased more and/or whose mental health status had improved more had greater percentages of their baseline needs met. There was a non-significant trend for smaller percentages of baseline needs to be met in Basingstoke than in Southampton. Conclusions : At ground level, disabled people’s views were taken into account, to some extent, in the provision of rehabilitation services. This input should be made at a higher level, in the overall shaping of services.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 15 December 2000

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 55327
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/55327
ISSN: 0963-8288
PURE UUID: ac35c9c7-b236-4a72-bd40-b046201c1fd9

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Aug 2008
Last modified: 22 Jul 2022 21:04

Export record

Contributors

Author: Paula Kersten
Author: David Lindsay McLellan
Author: Steve George
Author: Jennifer.A.E. Smith
Author: Mark.A. Mullee

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×