Development of criticality among undergraduates in two academic disciplines
Development of criticality among undergraduates in two academic disciplines
Although ‘criticality’ and related concepts have long been recognised among the aims of higher education (e.g. Newman 1899/1996), the processes by which criticality is developed, and indeed the nature of the concept in the contemporary university, have been subject to little empirical study. Discussion about criticality has existed uneasily within a debate about the purposes of higher education (for example, how does it relate to the university’s role as provider of specific skills directly usable in employment, or as developer of general intellectual skills which can be used later in different contexts, or as the source of an environment in which personal and cultural development can take place?). Despite some careful analyses of aspects of the critical process, or of the goals of critical education (e.g. Barnett’s 1997 theorisation of criticality; Bailin et al.’s 1999 theorisation of resources needed for critical thinking to take place), practice in universities across a range of disciplines and levels has not been analysed in any detail.
Economic and Social Research Council
Mitchell, Rosamond
de2eabed-7903-43fa-961a-c16f69fddd7e
Johnston, Brenda
19367bd6-ac46-4e33-a352-ace08c2d4323
Myles, Florence
ddf117d7-7e40-4d54-beda-abce3f88a169
Ford, Peter
a83b6b4a-320e-4c2b-a4e1-c5efa5b8887c
2004
Mitchell, Rosamond
de2eabed-7903-43fa-961a-c16f69fddd7e
Johnston, Brenda
19367bd6-ac46-4e33-a352-ace08c2d4323
Myles, Florence
ddf117d7-7e40-4d54-beda-abce3f88a169
Ford, Peter
a83b6b4a-320e-4c2b-a4e1-c5efa5b8887c
Mitchell, Rosamond, Johnston, Brenda, Myles, Florence and Ford, Peter
(2004)
Development of criticality among undergraduates in two academic disciplines
Southampton, UK.
Economic and Social Research Council
18pp.
Record type:
Monograph
(Project Report)
Abstract
Although ‘criticality’ and related concepts have long been recognised among the aims of higher education (e.g. Newman 1899/1996), the processes by which criticality is developed, and indeed the nature of the concept in the contemporary university, have been subject to little empirical study. Discussion about criticality has existed uneasily within a debate about the purposes of higher education (for example, how does it relate to the university’s role as provider of specific skills directly usable in employment, or as developer of general intellectual skills which can be used later in different contexts, or as the source of an environment in which personal and cultural development can take place?). Despite some careful analyses of aspects of the critical process, or of the goals of critical education (e.g. Barnett’s 1997 theorisation of criticality; Bailin et al.’s 1999 theorisation of resources needed for critical thinking to take place), practice in universities across a range of disciplines and levels has not been analysed in any detail.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2004
Additional Information:
R000239657
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 55424
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/55424
PURE UUID: 74953cab-461d-436d-8dbf-67fc72e34f2c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Aug 2008
Last modified: 10 Nov 2022 02:31
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Brenda Johnston
Author:
Florence Myles
Author:
Peter Ford
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics