Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke
Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke
Background. Patterns of recovery provide useful information concerning the potential of physical recovery over time and therefore the setting of realistic goals for rehabilitation programs. Objective. To compare the time course of trunk recovery with the patterns of recovery of arm, leg, and functional ability. Methods . Consecutive stroke patients were recruited in 2 acute neurology wards. Participants were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 and 6 months after stroke. Patients were assessed with the Trunk Impairment Scale, Fugl-Meyer arm and leg test, and Barthel Index. Results. Thirty-two patients were included in the study. There were no dropouts. Repeated measures analysis of the recovery patterns of motor and functional performance revealed the most striking improvement for all measures from 1 week to 1 month (P value between .0021 and <.0001) and a significant improvement from 1 month to 3 months after stroke (P value ranges from .0008 to <.0001). No significant improvement was found between 3 and 6 months after stroke for any of the measures. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery (P = .2565). No significant differences in level of motor and functional recovery were found at the different time points. Conclusions. Separate analyses of motor and functional recovery patterns after stroke confirm the importance of the first month for recovery. Contrary to common belief, the time course of recovery of the trunk is similar to the recovery of arm, leg, and functional ability.
cerebrovascular accident, recovery of function, rehabilitation.
173-179
Verheyden, Geert.
65d3e411-9892-4f78-8a40-1131b2798abc
Nieuwboer, Alice.
0f6a908f-acde-4659-873b-d2d18b881444
De Wit, Liesbet .
bc5bc6f6-21cf-4eb0-95c2-54073059c017
Thijs, Vincent.
50b03a53-f908-44be-a214-6c533eb766f7
Dobbelaere, Jan.
3a8d3b7a-6e87-48d0-9adf-249d29ff8557
Devos, Hannes.
d264a1a2-5243-48d7-9588-33befb5a8fec
Severijns, Deborah .
870a97e7-f71a-4a54-8d00-1fdb2af99bcb
Vanbeveren, Stefanie .
1adce5dc-f6d1-454b-9fc2-a747fcf490db
De Weerdt, Willy.
692329db-8ac8-4e79-b33a-1241e53dc919
April 2008
Verheyden, Geert.
65d3e411-9892-4f78-8a40-1131b2798abc
Nieuwboer, Alice.
0f6a908f-acde-4659-873b-d2d18b881444
De Wit, Liesbet .
bc5bc6f6-21cf-4eb0-95c2-54073059c017
Thijs, Vincent.
50b03a53-f908-44be-a214-6c533eb766f7
Dobbelaere, Jan.
3a8d3b7a-6e87-48d0-9adf-249d29ff8557
Devos, Hannes.
d264a1a2-5243-48d7-9588-33befb5a8fec
Severijns, Deborah .
870a97e7-f71a-4a54-8d00-1fdb2af99bcb
Vanbeveren, Stefanie .
1adce5dc-f6d1-454b-9fc2-a747fcf490db
De Weerdt, Willy.
692329db-8ac8-4e79-b33a-1241e53dc919
Verheyden, Geert., Nieuwboer, Alice., De Wit, Liesbet ., Thijs, Vincent., Dobbelaere, Jan., Devos, Hannes., Severijns, Deborah ., Vanbeveren, Stefanie . and De Weerdt, Willy.
(2008)
Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22 (2), .
(doi:10.1177/1545968307305456).
Abstract
Background. Patterns of recovery provide useful information concerning the potential of physical recovery over time and therefore the setting of realistic goals for rehabilitation programs. Objective. To compare the time course of trunk recovery with the patterns of recovery of arm, leg, and functional ability. Methods . Consecutive stroke patients were recruited in 2 acute neurology wards. Participants were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 and 6 months after stroke. Patients were assessed with the Trunk Impairment Scale, Fugl-Meyer arm and leg test, and Barthel Index. Results. Thirty-two patients were included in the study. There were no dropouts. Repeated measures analysis of the recovery patterns of motor and functional performance revealed the most striking improvement for all measures from 1 week to 1 month (P value between .0021 and <.0001) and a significant improvement from 1 month to 3 months after stroke (P value ranges from .0008 to <.0001). No significant improvement was found between 3 and 6 months after stroke for any of the measures. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery (P = .2565). No significant differences in level of motor and functional recovery were found at the different time points. Conclusions. Separate analyses of motor and functional recovery patterns after stroke confirm the importance of the first month for recovery. Contrary to common belief, the time course of recovery of the trunk is similar to the recovery of arm, leg, and functional ability.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: April 2008
Keywords:
cerebrovascular accident, recovery of function, rehabilitation.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 55443
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/55443
ISSN: 1545-9683
PURE UUID: 7fd3be40-d7e1-4ef6-b7ce-9326ba8cba46
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 31 Jul 2008
Last modified: 09 Jan 2022 07:24
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Geert. Verheyden
Author:
Alice. Nieuwboer
Author:
Liesbet . De Wit
Author:
Vincent. Thijs
Author:
Jan. Dobbelaere
Author:
Hannes. Devos
Author:
Deborah . Severijns
Author:
Stefanie . Vanbeveren
Author:
Willy. De Weerdt
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics