The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Effectiveness of grade-control structures in reducing erosion along incised river channels: the case of Hotophia Creek, Mississippi

Effectiveness of grade-control structures in reducing erosion along incised river channels: the case of Hotophia Creek, Mississippi
Effectiveness of grade-control structures in reducing erosion along incised river channels: the case of Hotophia Creek, Mississippi
Herein, we undertake a geomorphological analysis in which spatial and temporal trends of bed and bank erosion along an 18-km length of Hotophia Creek, Mississippi, are estimated for the period between 1961 and 2050. The evaluation was undertaken for two scenarios of channel response to channelization during 1961-1963. One scenario represents the 'actual' response of the channel and includes the effects of installing a series of grade-control structures (GCS) between 1980 and 1996, while the other represents a hypothetical scenario in which the channel is left to adjust naturally. This allows the effectiveness of GCS in reducing in-channel erosion to be assessed. The analysis relies on the availability of channel survey data to develop empirical bed and bank response models for each adjustment scenario, supplemented by bank stability modelling to predict future rates of bank erosion. Results indicate that channel erosion rates decline nonlinearly with respect to time since 1961, for both adjustment scenarios. However, by the year 2050, the ''with'' GCS adjustment scenario results in the cumulative removal of some 663,000 (9%) extra tonnes of sediment relative to the ''without'' GCS scenario. Most (63%) of this excess is derived from enhanced bed erosion during 1976-1985 and 1985-1992, with the remainder derived from increased bank erosion during 1985-1992. Detailed analysis of the patterns of erosion and deposition, and their association with the GCS, provides evidence to support the view that GCS installed along Hotophia Creek have, for the most part, been ineffective in reducing channel erosion rates. This is because the GCS were installed too late to prevent bed degradation, caused by the 1961-1963 channelization, migrating upstream. In addition, some structures have disrupted the downstream transmission of bed material from eroded reaches upstream, exacerbating bed degradation and bank erosion in incised reaches downstream.
Hotophia Creek, grade-control structures, sediment yield, erosion control, applied geomorphology
0169-555X
229-254
Simon, Andrew
a987b2c8-cd9d-4336-b009-b3250dfc84fd
Darby, Stephen E.
4c3e1c76-d404-4ff3-86f8-84e42fbb7970
Simon, Andrew
a987b2c8-cd9d-4336-b009-b3250dfc84fd
Darby, Stephen E.
4c3e1c76-d404-4ff3-86f8-84e42fbb7970

Simon, Andrew and Darby, Stephen E. (2002) Effectiveness of grade-control structures in reducing erosion along incised river channels: the case of Hotophia Creek, Mississippi. Geomorphology, 42 (3), 229-254. (doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00088-5).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Herein, we undertake a geomorphological analysis in which spatial and temporal trends of bed and bank erosion along an 18-km length of Hotophia Creek, Mississippi, are estimated for the period between 1961 and 2050. The evaluation was undertaken for two scenarios of channel response to channelization during 1961-1963. One scenario represents the 'actual' response of the channel and includes the effects of installing a series of grade-control structures (GCS) between 1980 and 1996, while the other represents a hypothetical scenario in which the channel is left to adjust naturally. This allows the effectiveness of GCS in reducing in-channel erosion to be assessed. The analysis relies on the availability of channel survey data to develop empirical bed and bank response models for each adjustment scenario, supplemented by bank stability modelling to predict future rates of bank erosion. Results indicate that channel erosion rates decline nonlinearly with respect to time since 1961, for both adjustment scenarios. However, by the year 2050, the ''with'' GCS adjustment scenario results in the cumulative removal of some 663,000 (9%) extra tonnes of sediment relative to the ''without'' GCS scenario. Most (63%) of this excess is derived from enhanced bed erosion during 1976-1985 and 1985-1992, with the remainder derived from increased bank erosion during 1985-1992. Detailed analysis of the patterns of erosion and deposition, and their association with the GCS, provides evidence to support the view that GCS installed along Hotophia Creek have, for the most part, been ineffective in reducing channel erosion rates. This is because the GCS were installed too late to prevent bed degradation, caused by the 1961-1963 channelization, migrating upstream. In addition, some structures have disrupted the downstream transmission of bed material from eroded reaches upstream, exacerbating bed degradation and bank erosion in incised reaches downstream.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 15 January 2002
Keywords: Hotophia Creek, grade-control structures, sediment yield, erosion control, applied geomorphology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 55498
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/55498
ISSN: 0169-555X
PURE UUID: 63b9f276-78a6-4b34-a285-1d5b57337b39
ORCID for Stephen E. Darby: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8778-4394

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Jul 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Andrew Simon

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×