The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading

Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading
Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading
An important issue in the understanding of eye movements in reading is what kind of nonfoveal information can influence where we move our eyes. In Experiment 1, first fixation landing positions were nearer the beginning of misspelled words. Experiment 2 showed that the informativeness of word beginnings does not influence where words are first fixated. In both experiments, refixations were more likely to be to the left of the initial fixation position if the words were misspelled. Also, there was no influence of spelling on prior fixation durations or refixation probabilities, that is, there was no evidence for parafoveal-on-foveal effects. The results show that the orthographic familiarity, but not informativeness, of word initial letter sequences influences where words are first fixated.
0954-1446
52-78
White, Sarah J.
6691e495-5b54-40f7-b75b-012f77e5a493
Liversedge, Simon P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee
White, Sarah J.
6691e495-5b54-40f7-b75b-012f77e5a493
Liversedge, Simon P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee

White, Sarah J. and Liversedge, Simon P. (2004) Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16 (1/2), 52-78. (doi:10.1080/09541440340000204).

Record type: Article

Abstract

An important issue in the understanding of eye movements in reading is what kind of nonfoveal information can influence where we move our eyes. In Experiment 1, first fixation landing positions were nearer the beginning of misspelled words. Experiment 2 showed that the informativeness of word beginnings does not influence where words are first fixated. In both experiments, refixations were more likely to be to the left of the initial fixation position if the words were misspelled. Also, there was no influence of spelling on prior fixation durations or refixation probabilities, that is, there was no evidence for parafoveal-on-foveal effects. The results show that the orthographic familiarity, but not informativeness, of word initial letter sequences influences where words are first fixated.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: January 2004

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 55516
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/55516
ISSN: 0954-1446
PURE UUID: 31a80b08-796c-4a47-a4b8-5d006ad6510c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Aug 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 10:55

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sarah J. White
Author: Simon P. Liversedge

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×